A procedure for studying online conversational processing using a chat bot

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 156-163

  Holtgraves, Thomas ^a   Han, Tai Lin ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347252661     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192855     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ALICE [CONVERSATION BOT]. Artificial Intelligence Foundation. Retrieved February 2, 2005, from www.alicebot.org/.
2. CLARK, H. H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. CLARK, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. GERNSBACHER, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. GIBBS, R. W., JR., & MUELLER, R. (1988). Conversational sequences and preference for indirect speech acts. Discourse Processes, 11, 101-116.
6. GRAESSER, A. C., SINGER, M., & TRABASSO, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
7. GRICE, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
8. HANNA, J. E., TANENHAUS, M. K., & TRUESWELL, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretatioa Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 43-61.
9. HOLTGRAVES, T. (1994). Communication in context: Effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1205-1218.
10. HOLTGRAVES, T. (1998). Interpreting indirect replies. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 1-27.
11. HOLTGRAVES, T. (1999). Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 519-540.
12. HOLTGRAVES, T. (2000). Preference organization and reply comprehension. Discourse Processes, 30, 87-106.
13. HOLTGRAVES, T. (2007). Processing the action dimension of language. Manuscript under review.
14. HOLTGRAVES, T., & ASHLEY, A. (2001). Comprehending illocutionary force. Memory & Cognition, 29, 83-90.
15. HOLTGRAVES, T., ROSS, S. J., WEYWADT, C. R., & HAN T. L. (2007). Perceiving artificial social agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2163-2174.
16. KEENAN, E. O., & SCHIEFFELIN, B. (1976). Topic as a discourse notion. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 337-384). New York: Academic Press.
17. KEYSAR, B. (1994). The illusory transparency of intention: Linguistic perspective taking in text. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 165-208.
18. KEYSAR, B., BARR, D. J., BALIN, J. A., & BRAUNER, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32-38.
19. KINTSCH, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
20. KRAUSS, R. M., & FUSSELL, S. R. (1991). Perspective taking in communication: Representations of others' knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9, 2-24.
21. SCHEGLOFF, E. A., JEFFERSON, G., & SACKS, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
22. SCHEGLOFF, E. A., & SACKS, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
23. STILES, W. B. (1978). Verbal response modes and dimensions of interpersonal roles: A method of discourse analysis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36, 693-703.