Impersonal, general, and social: The use of metonymy versus passive voice in medical discourse

Written Communication

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 250-277

  Rundblad, Gabriella ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive discourse analysis; Impersonalization; Medical research articles; Methods section; Social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347248383     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088307302946     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anderson, J. (1971). The grammar of case: Towards a localist theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Atkinson, D. (1999). Language and science. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 193-214.
3. Banks, D. (1994). Clause organization in the scientific journal article. ALSED-LSP Newsletter, 17, 4-16.
4. Barber, C. (1962). Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In F. Behre (Ed.), Contributions to English syntax and philology (pp. 21-43). Gothenburg, Sweden: Almqvist and Wiksell.
5. Berman, R.A. (2004). Introduction: Developing discourse stance in different text types and languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 105-124.
6. Blanco-Gámez, M.L. (2002). Hiding the agent in English and Spanish newspaper articles: The periphrastic passive. In J. I. Marín Arrese (Ed.), Conceptualization of events in newspaper discourse: Mystification of agency and degree of implication in news reports (pp. 9-30). Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
7. Chilton, P.A. (2000). Participant roles and the analysis of leadership discourse: British and American leaders explain the Kosovo crisis. In K. P. Schneider (Ed.), Language use, language acquisition and language history (pp. 249-267). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Croft, W. (2002). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven and R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 161-205). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. Ding, D. (1998). Rationality reborn: Historical roots of the passive voice in scientific discourse. In J. Battalio (Ed.), Essays in the study of scientific discourse: Methods, practice, and pedagogy (pp. 117-134). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
11. Ding, D. (2002). The passive voice and social values in science. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 32, 137-154.
12. Dorgeloh, H. (2004). The limits of variation in scientific abstracts-Syntactic and functional constraints. I.T.L. Review of Applied Linguistics, 143/144, 199-222.
13. Draper, G.J., Little, M.P., Sorahan, T., Kinlen, L.J., Bunch, K.J., Conquest, A.J., et al. (1997). Cancer in the offspring of radiation workers: A record linkage study. British Medical Journal, 315, 1181-1188.
14. Ellis, M., Manandhar, N., Manandhar, D.S., & Costello, A.M. (2000). Risk factors for neonatal encephalopathy in Kathmandu, Nepal, a developing country: Unmatched case-control study. British Medical Journal, 320, 1229-1236.
15. Espinoza, A.M. (1997). Contrastive analysis of the Spanish and English passive voice in scientific prose. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 229-243.
16. Fillmore, C.J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 5, 222-254.
17. Gibb, D.M., Duong, T., Tookey, P.A., Sharland, M., Tudor-Williams, G., Novelli, V., et al. (2003). Decline in mortality, AIDS, and hospital admissions in perinatally HIV-1 infected children in the United Kingdom and Ireland. British Medical Journal, 327, 1019-1024.
18. Gilbert, G.N. (1976). The transformation of research findings into scientific knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 6, 281-306.
19. Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
20. Giván, T. (1994). The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In T. Giván (Ed.), Voice and inversion (pp. 3-44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
22. Halperin, D.S., Bouvier, P., Jaffe, P.D., Mounoud, R.L., Pawlak, C.H., Laederach, J., et al. (1996). Prevalence of child sexual abuse among adolescents in Geneva: Results of a cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 312, 1326-1329.
23. Hundt, M., & Mair, C. (1999). " Agile" and "uptight" genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 4, 221-242.
24. Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 239-256.
25. Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17, 433-454.
26. Jackendoff, R. (1983). Language and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Jayawant, S., Rawlinson, A., Gibbon, F., Price, J., Schulte, J., Sharples, P., et al. (1998). Subdural haemorrhages in infants: Population based study. British Medical Journal, 317, 1558-1561.
28. Kitagawa, C., & Lehrer, A. (1990). Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 739-759.
29. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
31. MacDonald, M.N. (2002). Pedagogy, pathology and ideology: The production, transmission and reproduction of medical discourse. Discourse and Society, 13, 447-467.
32. Marín Arrese, J.I. (2002). Mystification of agency in passive, impersonal and spontaneous situation types. In J. I. Marín Arrese (Ed.), Conceptualization of events in newspaper discourse: Mystification of agency and degree of implication in news reports (pp. 31-54). Madrid, Spain: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
33. Myers G. (1990). Stories and styles in two molecular biology review articles. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 45-75). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
34. Orasan, C. (2001). Patterns in scientific abstracts. In P. Rayson, A. Wilson, T. McEnery, A. Hardie, & S. Khoja (Eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2001 conference (pp. 433-443). Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
35. Rodman, L. (1981). The passive in technical and scientific writing. Journal of Advanced Composition, 2, 165-172.
36. Rodman, L. (1994). The active voice in scientific articles: Frequency and discourse functions. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 24, 309-331.
37. Roman, E., Doyle, P., Maconochie, N., Davies, G., Smith, P.G., & Beral, V. (1999). Cancer in children of nuclear industry employees: Report on children aged under 25 years from nuclear industry family study. British Medical Journal, 318, 1443-1450.
38. Rundblad, G., Chilton, P.A., & Hunter, P.R. (2006). An enquiry into scientific and media discourse in the MMR controversy: Authority and factuality. Communication & Medicine, 3 (1), 69-80.
39. Scott, S., Spender, Q., Doolan, M., Jacobs, B., & Aspland, H. (2001). Multicentre controlled trial of parenting groups for childhood antisocial behaviour in clinical practice. British Medical Journal, 323, 1-7.
40. Segal, J.Z. (1993). Strategies of influence in medical authorship. Social Science and Medicine, 37, 521-530.
41. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalisation patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57-149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Tappin, D., Brooke, H., Ecob, R., & Gibson, A. (2002). Used infant mattresses and sudden infant death syndrome in Scotland: Case-control study. British Medical Journal, 325, 1007-1012.
44. Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V. (1981). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers. ESP Journal, 1, 123-140.
45. Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V. (1998). On the use of the passive and active voice in astrophysics journals: With extensions to other languages and other fields. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 113-132.
46. Vande Kopple, W.J. (1994). Some characteristics and functions of grammatical subjects in scientific discourse. Written Communication, 11, 534-564.
47. Van Hell, J.G., Verhoeven, L., Tak, M., & Van Oosterhout, M. (2005). To take a stance: A developmental study of the use of pronouns and passives in spoken and written narrative and expository texts in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 239-273.
48. Varantola, K. (1987). Popularization strategies and text functional shifts in scientific/technical writing. ALSED-LSP Newsletter, 10, 33-52.
49. Viner, R., & Hotopf, M. (2004). Childhood predictors of self reported chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis in adults: National birth cohort study. British Medical Journal, 329, 941-945.
50. Wales, K. (1980). Exophora re-examined: The uses of we in present-day English. UEA Papers in Linguistics, 12, 21-44.
51. Wales, K. (1996). Personal pronouns in present-day English: Studies in English language series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.