Family planning advice and postpartum contraceptive use among low-income women in Mexico

International Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 6-12

  Barber, Sarah L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD PÚBLICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE USE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; STRATEGIC APPROACH; WOMENS STATUS;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MEXICO; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUERPERIUM; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MEXICO; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; URBAN HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 34347241009     PISSN: None     EISSN: 01903187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1363/3300607     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. RamaRao S and Mohanam R, The quality of family planning programs: concepts, measurements, interventions, and effects, Studies in Family Planning, 2003, 34(4):227-248.
2. Barberis M and Harvey PD, Costs of family planning programs in fourteen developing countries by method of service delivery, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1997, 29(2):219-233.
3. Prata N et al., Revisiting community-based distribution programs: are they still needed? Contraception, 2005, 72(6):402-407.
4. Briggs CJ, Capdegelle P and Garner P, Strategies for integrating primary health services in middle- and low-income countries: effects on performance, costs and patient outcomes, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2001, (4):CD003318.
5. Huntington D and Aplogan A, The integration of family planning and childhood immunization services in Togo, Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(3):176-183.
6. Taylor CE and Parker RL, Integrating PHC services: evidence from Narangwal, India, Health Policy and Planning, 1987, 2(2):150-161.
7. Levitt C et al., Systematic review of the literature on postpartum care: selected contraception methods, postpartum Papanicolaou test, and rubella immunization, Birth, 2004, 31(3):203-212.
8. Seiber EE et al., Maternal and child health and family planning service utilization in Guatemala: implications for service integration, Social Science & Medicine, 2005, 61(2):279-291.
9. Hotchkiss DR et al., The effects of maternal-child health service utilization on subsequent contraceptive use in Morocco, Journal of Biosocial Science, 1999, 31(2):145-165.
10. Zerai A and Tsui AO, The relationship between prenatal care and subsequent modern contraceptive use in Bolivia, Egypt and Thailand, African Journal of Reproductive Health, 2001, 5(2):68-82.
11. World Health Organization (WHO), Reproductive Health Strategy to Accelerate Progress Towards the Attainment of International Development Goals and Targets, Geneva: WHO, 2004.
12. United Nations, World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision, , accessed Feb. 7, 2007.
13. Potter JE, Mojarro O and Nuñez L, The influence of health care on contraceptive acceptance in rural Mexico, Studies in Family Planning, 1987, 18(3):144-156.
14. Gómez de León J and Hernández D, Poverty and Contraceptive Use in Rural Mexico: Poverty, Fertility and Family Planning, Mexico City: Committee for International Cooperation in National Research in Demography, 1998.
15. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), State of World Population 2005: The Promise of Equality - Gender Equity, Reproductive Health and the Millennium Development Goals, New York: UNFPA, 2005.
16. Ministry of Health, Norma Oficial Mexicana, NOM-007-SSA2-1993, Atención a la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio a recién nacidos. Criterios y procedimientos para la prestación del servicio, Mexico City. Ministry of Health, 1993.
17. Deaton A, The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconomic Approach to Policy Development, Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
18. Romero-Gutiérrez G et al., Postpartum contraceptive acceptance in León, Mexico: a multivariate analysis, European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 2003, 8(4):210-216.
19. Lei ZW et al., Effect of pretreatment counseling on discontinuation rates in Chinese women given depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception, Contraception, 1996, 53(6):357-361.
20. RamaRao, S et al., The link between quality of care and contraceptive use, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2003, 29(2):76-83.
21. Cotten N et al., Early discontinuation. of contraceptive use in Niger and the Gambia, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1992, 18(4):145-149.
22. Mensch B, Arends-Kuenning M and Jain A, The impact of the quality of family planning services on contraceptive use in Peru, Studies in Family Planning, 1996, 27(2):59-75.
23. Potter JE, The persistence of outmoded contraceptive regimes: the cases of Mexico and Brazil, Population and Development Review, 1999, 25(4):703-739.
24. Barber SL, Quality of care in developing countries: its importance, measurement, and selected quality improvement programs and policies, Working Paper, Institute of Business and Economic Research, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2007.
25. Koenig MA et al., The influence of quality of care upon contraceptive use in rural Bangladesh, Studies in Family Planning, 1997, 28(4): 278-289.
26. Brook RH, McGlynn EA and Skekelle P, Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from U.S. researchers, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2000, 12(4):281-295.
27. Speizer IS and Bollen KS, How well do perceptions of family planning service quality correspond to objective measures? evidence from Tanzania, Studies in Family Planning, 2000, 31(2):163-177.
28. Feldman B, unpublished data, Boston, MA, USA: Harvard School of Public Health, 2006.
29. Molyneaux JW and Gertler PJ, The impact of targeted family planning programs in Indonesia, Population and Development Review, 2000, 26(Suppl.):61-85.