Stream depletion in alluvial valleys using the SDF semianalytical model

Ground Water

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 506-514

  Miller, Calvin D ^a   Durnford, Deanna ^a   Halstead, Mary R ^b   Altenhofen, Jon ^c   Flory, Val ^c  

^a Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering and School of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^b Wildlife Health Program   (United States)

^c Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; AQUIFERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; STANDARDIZATION; STREAM FLOW;

ALLUVIAL VALLEYS; AQUIFER BOUNDARY; GROUND WATER PUMPING; RESPONSE CURVES;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; AQUIFER; NUMERICAL MODEL; RECHARGE; STREAM; TRANSMISSIVITY;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; RIVER; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER FLOW; WATER SUPPLY;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RIVERS; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 34347236503     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00311.x     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Bouwer, H., and T. Maddock. 1997. Making sense of the interactions between groundwater and streamflow: Lessons for water masters and adjudicators. Rivers 6, no. 1 : 19 31.
2. Butler, J.J. Jr., V.A. Zlotnik, and M.S. Tsou. 2001. Drawdown and stream depletion produced by pumping in the vicinity of a partially penetrating stream. Ground Water 39, no. 5 : 651 659.
3. COHYST Technical Committee. 2004. The 40-year, 28-percent stream depletion lines for the COHYST area west of Elm Creek, Nebraska. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources. http://cohyst.dnr.ne.gov/ cohyst_preliminarydata.html (accessed March 16, 2006).
4. Cuthbertson, S.C. 2005. Division 1 augmentation plan strategies and associated administration and accounting issues. Newsletter of the Office of the State Engineer, Colorado Division of Water Resources. Streamlines 19, no. 1 : 3 6.
5. Ferris, J.G., D.B., Knowles, R.H. Brown, and R.W. Stallman. 1962. Theory of aquifer tests. USGS Water Supply Paper 1536-E. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
6. Fox, G.A., P. DuChateau, and D.S. Durnford. 2002. Analytical model for aquifer response incorporating distributed stream leakage. Ground Water 40, no. 4 : 378 384.
7. Glover, R.E. 1978. Transient Ground Water Hydraulics. Fort Collins, Colorado : Water Resources Publications.
8. Glover, R.E. 1968. The pumped well. Colorado State University Experiment Station. Technical Bulletin 100. Fort Collins, Colorado: CSU Experiment Station.
9. Glover, R.E. 1966. Ground-water movement. Water Resources Technical Publication, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Engineering Monograph No. 31. Washington, D.C. : Government Printing Office.
10. Glover, R.E. 1960. Ground water-surface water relationships. Paper CER60REG45. Western Resources Conference, Boulder, Colorado. Denver : Colorado Ground Water Commission, Colorado Department of Natural Resources.
11. Glover, R.E., and C.G. Balmer. 1954. River depletion resulting from pumping a well near a river. AGU Transactions 35, no. 3 : 468 470.
12. Grant, D.L. 1987. The complexities of managing hydrologically connected surface water and groundwater under the appropriation doctrine. Land and Water Law Review 22, no. 1 : 63 95.
13. Halstead, M., and V. Flory. 2003. Tamarack modeling project. Draft report and technical memorandums. Denver, Colorado : Division of Wildlife, Colorado Department of Natural Resources.
14. Hantush, M.S. 1967. Depletion of flow in right-angle stream bends by steady wells. Water Resources Research 3, no. 1 : 235 240.
15. Hantush, M.S. 1965. Wells near streams with semipervious beds. Journal of Geophysical Research 70, no. 12 : 2829 2838.
16. Hantush, M.S. 1955. Discussion of "River depletion resulting from pumping a well near a river." AGU Transactions 36, no. 2 : 345 347.
17. Harbaugh, A.W., E.R. Banta, M.C. Hill, and M.G. McDonald. 2000. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model - User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. USGS Open-File Report 00 92. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
18. Hunt, B. 2003. Unsteady stream depletion from ground water pumping from semiconfined aquifer. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 8, no 1 : 12 19.
19. Hunt, B. 1999. Unsteady stream depletion from ground water pumping. Ground Water 37, no. 1 : 98 102.
20. Hurr, R.T., and P.A. Schneider Jr. 1972a. Hydrogeologic characteristics of the valley-fill aquifer in the Julesburg reach of the South Platte River Valley, Colorado. USGS Open-File Report. Lakewood: Colorado District, Water Resources Division.
21. Hurr, R.T., and P.A. Schneider Jr. 1972b. Hydrogeologic characteristics of the valley-fill aquifer in the Sterling reach of the South Platte River Valley, Colorado. USGS Open-File Report. Lakewood: Colorado District, Water Resources Division.
22. Jenkins, C.T. 1970. Computation of rate and volume of stream depletion by wells. In Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the USGS, Book 4, Chapter D1. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
23. Jenkins, C.T. 1968a. Techniques for computing rate and volume of stream depletion by wells. Ground Water 6, no. 2 : 37 46.
24. Jenkins, C.T. 1968b. Electric-analog and digital computer model analysis of stream depletion by wells. Ground Water 6, no. 6 : 27 34.
25. Jenkins, C.T., and O.J. Taylor. 1974. A special planning technique for stream-aquifer systems. USGS Open-File Report No. 74-242. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
26. Jenkins, C.T., and O.J. Taylor. 1972. Stream depletion factors, Arkansas River Valley, southeastern Colorado: A basis for evaluating plans for conjunctive use of ground and surface water. USGS Open-File Report. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
27. Knight, J.H., M. Gilfedder, and G.R. Walker. 2005. Impacts of irrigation and dryland development on groundwater discharge to rivers - A unit response approach to cumulative impacts analysis. Journal of Hydrology 303, no. 1-4 : 79 91.
28. Kollet, S.J., and V.A. Zlotnik. 2003. Stream depletion predictions using pumping test data from a heterogeneous stream-aquifer system (a case study from the Great Plains, USA). Journal of Hydrology 281, no. 1-2 : 96 114.
29. Lough, H.K., and B. Hunt. 2006. Pumping test evaluation of stream depletion parameters. Ground Water 44, no. 4 : 540 546.
30. Luckey, R.R. 2005. Personal communication, March 17, Lakewood, Colorado.
31. MacDonnell, L.J. 1988. Colorado's law of "underground water": A look at the South Platte basin and beyond. University of Colorado Law Review 59, no. 3 : 579 625.
32. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. In USGS Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A1. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
33. McWhorter, D.B., and D.K. Sunada. 1977. Ground-Water Hydrology and Hydraulics. Highlands Ranch, Colorado : Water Resources Publications.
34. Missouri Basin States Association. 1982. Technical paper: Ground water depletion. Missouri River Basin Hydrology Study. Omaha, Nebraska: Missouri Basin States Association.
35. Moore, J.E., and L.A. Wood. 1967. Data requirements and preliminary results of an analog-model evaluation - Arkansas River Valley in eastern Colorado. Ground Water 5, no. 1 : 20 23.
36. Moulder, E.A., and C.T. Jenkins. 1969. Analog-digital models of stream-aquifer systems. Ground Water 7, no. 5 : 19 24.
37. Mueller, F.A., and J.W. Male. 1993. A management model for specification of groundwater withdrawal permits. Water Resources Research 29, no. 5 : 1359 1368.
38. Nebraska Dept. of Natural Resources. 2005. 2006 Annual evaluation of availability of hydrologically connected water supplies. Dated December 30, 2005. www.dnr.ne.gov/LB962/AnnualReport_2006 (accessed March 10, 2006).
39. Sophocleous, M. 2002. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal 10, no. 1 : 52 67.
40. Sophocleous, M., A. Koussis, J.L. Martin, and S.P. Perkins. 1995. Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration. Ground Water 33, 4 : 579 588.
41. Sophocleous, M., M.A. Townsend, L.D. Volger, T.J. McClain, E.T. Marks, and G.R. Coble. 1988. Experimental studies in stream-aquifer interaction along the Arkansas River in central Kansas - Field testing and analysis. Journal of Hydrology 98, no. 3-4 : 249 273.
42. Spalding, C.P., and R. Khaleel. 1991. An evaluation of analytical solutions to estimate drawdowns and stream depletion by wells. Water Resources Research 27, no. 4 : 597 609.
43. Theis, C.V. 1941. The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream. AGU Transactions 22, no. 3 : 734 738.
44. Theis, C.V. 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. AGU Transactions 16, no. 2 : 519 524.
45. Warner, J.W., J. Altenhofen, J. Odor, and B. Welch. 1994. Recharge as augmentation in the South Platte River basin. Groundwater Program Technical Report No. 21. Fort Collins, Colorado : Colorado State University.
46. Water Division No. 1. 1974. In the matter of the proposed rules and regulations governing the use, control and protection of surface and ground water rights located in the South Platte River and its tributaries. Amended Rules and Regulations of the State Engineer, Water Court for Water Division No. 1. State of Colorado.
47. Zarriello, P.J., and K.G. Reis III. 2000. A precipitation-runoff model for analysis of the effects of water withdrawals on streamflow, Ipswich River Basin, Massachusetts. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4029. Reston, Virginia : USGS.
48. Zlotnik, V.A. 2004. A concept of maximum stream depletion rate for leaky aquifers in alluvial valleys. Water Resources Research 40, no. 6 : W06507, doi:10.1029/2003WR002932.