Enhancing synchronization based on complex gradient networks

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2007, Pages

  Wang, Xingang ^a   Lai, Ying Cheng ^b   Lai, Choy Heng ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRADIENT METHODS; SYNCHRONIZATION;

CHAOTIC OSCILLATORS; GRADIENT STRUCTURES; HOMOGENEOUS NETWORKS;

OSCILLATORS (ELECTRONIC);

EID: 34347224787     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.056205     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/30918 393, 440 (1998).
2. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 286, 509 (1999).
3. S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35065725 410, 268 (2001).
4. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 74, 47 (2002).
5. M. E. J. Newman, SIAM Rev. SIREAD 0036-1445 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 45, 167 (2003).
6. S. Strogatz, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order (Hyperion, New York, 2003).
7. X. F. Wang and G. Chen, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. IJBEE4 0218-1274 10.1142/S0218127402004292 12, 187 (2002).
8. M. Barahona and L. M. Pecora, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.054101 89, 054101 (2002).
9. T. Nishikawa, A. E. Motter, Y.-C. Lai, and F. C. Hoppensteadt, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.014101 91, 014101 (2003).
10. A. E. Motter, C. S. Zhou, and J. Kurths, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2004-10365-4 69, 334 (2005)
11. A. E. Motter, C. S. Zhou, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016116 71, 016116 (2005).
12. D.-U. Hwang, M. Chavez, A. Amann, and S. Boccaletti, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.138701 94, 138701 (2005)
13. M. Chavez, D.-U. Hwang, A. Amann, H. G. E. Hentschel, and S. Boccaletti, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.218701 94, 218701 (2005).
14. T. Nishikawa and A. E. Motter, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.065106 73, 065106 (R) (2006)
15. T. Nishikawa and A. E. Motter, Physica D PDNPDT 0167-2789 10.1016/j.physd.2006.09.007 224, 77 (2006).
16. Z. Toroczkai and K. E. Bassler, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/428716a 428, 716 (2004)
17. Z. Toroczkai, B. Kozma, K. E. Bassler, N. W. Hengartner, and G. Korniss, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0408262.
18. K. Park, Y.-C. Lai, L. Zhao, and N. Ye, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.065105 71, 065105 (R) (2005).
19. A. E. Motter, C. S. Zhou, and J. Kurths, AIP Conf. Proc. APCPCS 0094-243X 10.1063/1.2011218 778, 201 (2005).
20. M. Zhao, T. Zhou, B.-H. Wang, Q. Ou, and J. Ren, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00383-6 53, 375 (2006).
21. A. Barrat, M. Barthélemy, R. Pastor-Satorras, and A. Vespignani, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0400087101 101, 3747 (2004)
22. P. J. Macdonald, E. Almaas, and A.-L. Barabási, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2005-10232-x 72, 308 (2005).
23. C. Zhou and J. Kurths, Chaos CHAOEH 1054-1500 10.1063/1.2150381 16, 015104 (2006).
24. In the limiting case of β→, it is possible that the network will be disconnected. This probability, however, is very small and can usually be neglected, especially for the densely connected scale-free networks of small values of γ. A detailed analysis about network breaking will be presented elsewhere (e-print arXiv:nlin.CD/0608035).