Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking

Biophysical Chemistry

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-10

  Li, Chun Hua ^a   Ma, Xiao Hui ^a,b   Shen, Long Zhu ^a   Chang, Shan ^a   Chen, Wei Zu ^a   Wang, Cun Xin ^a  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding affinity; Protein protein docking; Scoring function

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; ANTIGEN; ENZYME; ENZYME INHIBITOR; PROTEINASE; PROTEINASE INHIBITOR;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRICITY; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ORDO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS;

EID: 34347220502     PISSN: 03014622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2007.04.014     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Tovchigrechko A., Well C.A., and Vakser I.A. Docking of protein models. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 1888-1896
2. Chance M.R., Bresnick A.R., Burley S.K., Jiang J.S., Lima C.D., Sali A., Almo S.C., Bonanno J.B., Buglino J.A., Boulton S., Chen H., Eswar N., He G., Huang R., Ilyin V., McMahan L., Pieper U., Ray S., Vidal M., and Wang L.K. Structural genomics: a pipeline for providing structures for the biologist. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 723-738
3. Sali A., Glaeser R., Earnest T., and Baumeister W. From words to literature in structural proteomics. Nature 422 (2003) 216-225
4. Janin J., and Levitt M. Theory and simulation accuracy and reliability in modelling proteins and complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16 (2006) 1-3
5. Katchalski-Katzir E., Shariv I., Eisenstein M.A., Friesem C., Aflalo, and Vakser I. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between protein and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89 (1992) 2195-2199
6. Walls P.H., and Sternberg M.J. New algorithm to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity: applications to antibody-antigen docking. J. Mol. Biol. 228 (1992) 277-297
7. Rosenfeld R., Vajda S., and DeLisi C. Flexible docking and design. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 24 (1995) 677-700
8. Vakser I.A. Protein docking for low-resolution structures. Protein Eng. 8 (1995) 371-377
9. Sandak B., Nussinov R., and Wolfson H.J. A method for biomolecular structural recognition and docking allowing conformational flexibility. J. Comput. Biol. 5 (1998) 631-654
10. Althaus E., Kohlbacher O., Lenhof H.P., and Muller P. A combinatorial approach to protein docking with flexible side chains. J. Comput. Biol. 9 (2000) 597-612
11. Kohlbacher O., Burchardt A., Moll A., Hildebrandt A., Bayer P., and Lenhof H.-P. Structure prediction of protein complexes by a NMR-based protein docking algorithm. J. Biomol. NMR 20 (2001) 15-21
12. Halperin I., Ma B., Wolfson H., and Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 47 (2002) 409-443
13. McConkey B.J., Sobolev V., and Edelman M. Discrimination of native protein structures using atom-atom contact scoring. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83 (2002) 845-856
14. Lorber D.M., Udo M.K., and Shoichet B.K. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 1393-1408
15. Gray J.J., Moughan S.E., Wang C., Schueler-Furman O., Kuhlman B., Rohl C.A., and Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid body displacement and side chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 331 (2003) 281-299
16. Chen R., Li L., and Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 52 (2003) 80-87
17. Fernandez-Recio J., Totrov M., and Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 52 (2003) 113-117
18. Dominguez C., Boelens R., and Bonvin A.M. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 1731-1737
19. Ma X.H., Li C.H., Shen L.Z., Gong X.Q., Chen W.Z., and Wang C.X. Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 60 (2005) 319-323
20. Gabb H.A., Jackson R.M., and Sternberg M.J. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J. Mol. Biol. 272 (1997) 106-120
21. Heifetz A., Katchalski-Katzir E., and Eisenstein M. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 571-587
22. Zhang C., Vasmatzis G., Cornette J.L., and Delisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 267 (1997) 707-726
23. Moont G., Gabb H.A., and Sternberg M.J.E. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 35 (1999) 364-373
24. Liu S., Zhang C., Zhou H., and Zhou Y. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 56 (2004) 93-101
25. Gray J.J., Moughan S.E., Kortemme T., Schueler-Furman O., Misura K.M.S., Morozov A.V., and Baker D. Protein-protein docking predictions for the Capri experiment. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 52 (2003) 118-122
26. Jones S., and Thornton J.M. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93 (1996) 113-120
27. Lo Conte L., Chothia C., and Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285 (1998) 2177-2198
28. Betts M.J., and Sternberg M.J.E. An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. Protein Eng. 12 (1999) 271-283
29. Jackson R.M. Comparison of protein-protein interactions in serine protease-inhibitor and antibody-antigen complexes: implications for the protein docking problem. Protein Sci. 8 (1999) 603-613
30. Li C.H., Ma X.H., Chen W.Z., and Wang C.X. A protein-protein docking algorithm dependent on the type of the complexes. Protein Eng. 16 (2003) 256-269
31. Chen R., Mintseris J., Janin J., and Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 52 (2003) 88-91
32. Mintseris J., Wiehe K., Pierce B., Anderson R., Chen R., Janin J., and Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 60 (2005) 214-216
33. Fernández-Recio J., Totrov M., and Abagyan R. Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. J. Mol. Biol. 335 (2004) 843-865
34. Kuhlman B., and Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 (2000) 10383-10388
35. Brooks B.R., Bruccoleri R.F., Olafson B.D., States D.J., Swaminathan S., and Karplus M. Charmm: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 4 (1983) 187-217
36. Murphy J., Gatchell D., Prasad J., and Vajda S. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Biol. 3 (2003) 840-854
37. Hubbard S.J., and Thornton J.M. NACCESS. Computer Program Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (1993), University College London