The endangered species act and the distinct population segment policy

Ursus

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 109-116

  Rosen, Tatjana ^a  

^a BARD COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Delisting; Distinct population segment; Endangered species act; Evolutionarily significant unit; Grizzly bear; Isolation, significance; Ursus arctos; Yellowstone

Indexed keywords

URSUS ARCTOS;

EID: 34347219744     PISSN: 15376176     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2192/1537-6176(2007)18[109:TESAAT]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. ARNO, S.F. 1986. Whitebark pine cone crops - a diminishing source of wildlife food? Western Journal of Applied Forestry 1(3):92-94.
2. rd Congress, First Session, July 27, 1973. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, USA.
3. MACCRACKEN, J.G., D. GOBLE, AND J. O'LAUGHLIN. 1994. Grizzly bear recovery in Idaho. College of Natural Resources Policy Analysis Group, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA.
4. MATTSON, D.J., R.G. WRIGHT, K.C. KENDALL, AND C.J. MARTINKA. 1995. Grizzly bears. Pages 103-105 in E.T. LaRoe, G.S. Farris, C.E. Puckett, P.D. Doran, and M.J. Mac, editors. Our living resources: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. US National Biological Service, Washington, DC, USA.
5. _. 2000. Brown bear (Ursus arctos). Pages 66-71 in R.P. Reading and B. Miller, editors. Endangered animals: a reference guide to conflicting issues. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, USA.
6. MILLER, C., AND L. WAITS. 2003. The history of effective population size and genetic diversity in the Yellowstone grizzly (Ursus arctos): Implications for conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100:4334-4339.
7. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE. 1991. Policy on the definition of species under the Endangered Species Act. 56 Federal Register November 20, 1991:58612-58618.
8. PAETKAU, D., L.P. WAITS, P.L. CLARKSON, L. CRAIGHEAD, E. VYSE, R. WARD, AND C. STROBECK. 1998. Variation in genetic diversity across the range of North American brown bears. Conservation Biology 12:418-429.
9. SCHWARTZ, C.C., R.B. HARRIS, AND M. HAROLDSON. 2006. Impacts of spatial and environmental heterogeneity on grizzly bear demographics in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: a source-sink dynamics with management consequences. Pages 72-96 in C.C. Schwartz, M.A. Haroldson, G.C. White, R.B. Harris, S. Cherry, K.A. Keating, D. Moody, and C. Servheen, editors. Temporal, spatial and environmental influences on the demographics of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Wildlife Monographs 161.
10. th Congress, First Session. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.
11. TOMBACK, F.D., S.F. ARNO, AND R.E. KEANE. 2001. Whitebark pine communities: Ecology and restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
12. US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, 1993. Grizzly bear recovery plan. Missoula, Montana, USA.
13. _ AND NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION. 1996. Policy regarding the recognition of distinct vertebrate population segments under the Endangered Species Act. 61 Federal Register 7 February 1996:4722-4725.
14. _. 2003. 90-day finding for a petition to list the tristate area flock of trumpeter swans as threatened. 68 Federal Register, January 28 2003:4221-4228.
15. _. 2005. Designating the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Population of grizzly bears as a distinct population segment; removing the Yellowstone distinct population segment of grizzly bears from the federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. 50 Federal Register November 17 2005:69854-69884.
16. WAITS, L., AND L. TALBOT. 1998. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the North American brown bear and implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 12:408-417.
17. WAPLES, R.S. 1991. Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. and the definition of "species" under the Endangered Species Act. Marine Fisheries Review 53:11-22.
18. WYMAN, T. 2002. Grizzly bear predation on a bull bison in Yellowstone National Park. Ursus 13:375-377.