|
Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 18-20
|
Vasectomy reversal: Is the microscope really essential?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
POLYPROPYLENE;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
END TO END ANASTOMOSIS;
GENERAL ANESTHESIA;
HOSPITAL ADMISSION;
HOSPITAL DISCHARGE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MALE FERTILITY;
MALE STERILIZATION REVERSAL;
MICROSCOPE;
MICROSURGERY;
OPERATION DURATION;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PREGNANCY RATE;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
SPERMATOZOON COUNT;
SPONTANEOUS ABORTION;
SURGEON;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
FEMALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MICROSCOPY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PREGNANCY;
VASOVASOSTOMY;
ADULT;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MICROSCOPY;
MICROSURGERY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY RATE;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VASOVASOSTOMY;
|
EID: 34347212557
PISSN: 00369330
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1258/rsmsmj.52.2.18 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (11)
|