Morphometric analysis of experimentally induced periapical lesions: Radiographic vs histopathological findings

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 211-217

  De Rossi, Andiara ^a   De Rossi, M ^b   Rocha, L B ^a   Da Silva, L A B ^a   Rossi, M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Fluorescence; Microscopy; Periapical disease; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOG; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFLAMMATORY INFILTRATE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; PREMOLAR TOOTH; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT CANAL;

ANIMALS; DOGS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; PERIAPICAL PERIODONTITIS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROOT RESORPTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 34347211062     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/93927281     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Delano EO, Tyndall D, Ludlow JB, Trope M, Lost C. Quantitative radiographic follow-up of apical surgery: a radiometric and histologic correlation. J Endod 1998; 24: 420-426.
2. Cotti E, Vargiu P, Dettori C, Mallarini G. Computerized tomography in the management and follow-up of extensive periapical lesion. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15: 186-189.
3. Balto K, Muller R, Carrington DC, Dobeck J, Stashenko P. Quantification of periapical bone destruction in mice by microcomputed tomography. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 35-40.
4. Grecca FS, Leonardo MR, Silva LAB, Tanomaru Filho M, Borges MA. Radiographic evaluation of periradicular repair after endodontic treatment of dog's teeth with induced periradicular periodontitis. J Endod 2001; 27: 610-612.
5. De Rossi A, Silva LAB, Leonardo MR, Rocha LB, Rossi MA. Effect of rotary or manual instrumentation, with or without calcium hydroxide/1% chlorhexidine intracanal dressing, on the healing of experimentally induced chronic periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 628-636.
6. Brynolf I. A histological and roentgenological study of the periapical region of human upper incisors. Odontol Revy 1967; 18(Suppl 11): 1-176.
7. Laux M, Abbott PV, Pajarola G, Nair PN. Apical inflammatory root resorption: a correlative radiographic and histological assessment. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 483-493.
8. Farman AG, Avant SL, Scarfe WC, Farman TT, Green DB. In vivo comparison of Visualix-2 and Ektaspeed Plus in the assessment of periradicular lesion dimensions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 203-209.
9. Marmary Y, Koter T, Heling I. The effect of periapical rarefying osteits on cortical and cancellous bone. A study comparing conventional radiographs with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 267-271.
10. Scarfe WC, Czerniejewski VJ, Farman AG, Avant SL, Molteni R. In vivo accuracy and reliability of color-coded image enhancements for the assessment of periradicular lesion dimensions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 603-611.
11. Katebzadeh N, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Radiographic evaluation of periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals: an in vivo study. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 60-66.
12. Pitt Ford TR. The radiographic detection of periapical lesions in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1984; 57: 662-667.
13. Bender IB. Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bone lesions. J Endod 1982; 8: 161-170.
14. Andreasen FM, Sewerin I, Mandel U, Andreasen JO. Radiographic assessment of simulated root resorption cavities. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 21-27.
15. Goldberg F, De Silvio A, Dreyer C. Radiographic assessment of simulated external root resorption cavities in maxillary incisors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998; 14: 133-136.
16. Zarins CK, Zatina MA, Glagov S. Correlation of post mortem angiography with pathologic anatomy: quantitation of atherosclerotic lesions. In: Bond MG, (editor). Clinical diagnosis of atherosclerosis; quantitative methods of evaluation. New York, NY: Springer, 1986, pp 283-306.
17. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Lambrecht JT, Schneeberger P, Buser D. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral computed tomography of the maxilla and mandible. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 503-510.
18. Goga R, Chandler NP, Love RM. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 103-107.
19. Lehmann TM, Troeltsch E, Spitzer K. Image processing and enhancement provided by commercial dental software programs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 264-272.
20. Parissis N, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Tsirlis A, Patias P. Conventional radiographs vs digitized radiographs: image quality assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 353-356.
21. Fleming GR, Knight AWE, Morris JM, Morrison RJS, Robinson GW. Pico second fluorescence studies of xantene dyes. J Am Chem Soc 1977; 99: 4306-4311.