On the interpretation of recharge estimates from steady-state model calibrations

Ground Water

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 499-505

  Anderson Jr , William P ^a   Evans, David G ^b  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; WATER LEVELS;

RECHARGE ESTIMATES; TIME-VARYING RECHARGES; WATER FLOW;

GROUNDWATER;

FRESH WATER;

CALIBRATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; RECHARGE; STEADY-STATE EQUILIBRIUM; WATER LEVEL;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; STANDARD; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER FLOW; WATER SUPPLY;

CALIBRATION; FRESH WATER; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 34347208295     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00312.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson, M.P., and W.W. Woessner. 1992. Applied Groundwater Modeling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport. San Diego, California : Academic Press.
2. Anderson, W.P. Jr. 1999. The hydrology of Hatteras Island, North Carolina. Ph.D. diss., Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
3. Anderson, W.P. Jr., D.G. Evans, and S.W. Snyder. 2000. The effects of Holocene barrier-island evolution on water-table elevations, Hatteras Island, North Carolina, USA. Hydrogeology Journal 8, no. 4 : 390 404.
4. Ayers, J.F., and H.L. Vacher. 1983. A numerical model describing unsteady flow in a fresh water lens. Water Resources Bulletin 19, no. 5 : 785 792.
5. Gelhar, L.W. 1974. Stochastic analysis of phreatic aquifers. Water Resources Research 10, no. 3 : 539 545.
6. Haitjema, H.M. 1995. Analytic Element Modeling of Groundwater Flow. San Diego, California : Academic Press.
7. Hanson, R.T., M.W. Newhouse, and M.D. Dettinger. 2004. A methodology to assess relations between climatic variability and variations in hydrologic time series in the southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology 287, 252 269, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.006.
8. Kim, K., M.P. Anderson, and C.J. Bowser. 1999. Model calibration with multiple targets: A case study. Ground Water 37, no. 3 : 345 351.
9. Manga, M. 1997. A model for discharge in spring-dominated streams and implications for the transmissivity and recharge of quaternary volcanics in the Oregon Cascades. Water Resources Research 33, no. 8 : 1813 1822.
10. Manga, M. 1996. Hydrology of spring-dominated springs in the Oregon Cascades. Water Resources Research 32, no. 8 : 2435 2439.
11. Patankar, S.V. 1980. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. New York : Hemisphere Publishing Corp.
12. Swanson, S.K., and J.M. Bahr. 2004. Analytical and numerical models to explain steady rates of spring flow. Ground Water 42, no. 5 : 747 759.
13. Townley, L.R. 1995. The response of aquifers to periodic forcing. Advances in Water Resources 18, no. 3 : 125 146.
14. Wang, H.F., and M.P. Anderson. 1982. Introduction to Groundwater Modeling. San Diego, California : Academic Press.
15. Zhang, Y.-K., and Z. Li. 2005. Temporal scaling of hydraulic head fluctuations: Nonstationary spectral analyses and numerical simulations. Water Resources Research 41, no. 7 : W07031, doi:10.1029/2004WR003797.