Multi-objective analysis of a component-based representation within an interactive evolutionary design system

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 591-613

  MacHwe, A T ^a   Parmee, I C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clustering; Interactive evolutionary design systems; Multi objective evolutionary algorithms; Representation

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; INTERACTIVE DEVICES; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

AESTHETIC ASPECTS; PROBLEM INVOLVING; SEATING DESIGN; USER INTERACTION;

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;

EID: 34347205691     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03052150701391041     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Branke, J. and Deb, K., Integrating user preferences into evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In Knowledge Incorporation in Evolutionaiy Computation-Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, edited by Y. Jin, 2005 (Springer: Berlin).
2. Carnahan, B. and Dorris, N., Identifying relevant symbol design criteria using interactive evolutionary computation, In Genetic and Evolutionaiy Computing Conference (GECCO), 2004, pp. 433-440.
3. Deb, K., Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms, 2001 (Wiley: Chichester).
4. Eiben, A.E. and Smith, J.E., Springer Natural Computing Series, Introduction to Evolutionary Computation, 2003 (Springer: Berlin).
5. Fogel, D.B., An evolutionary approach to the travelling salesman problem. Biol. Cybernet., 1988, 60(2), 139-144.
6. Fonseca, C.M. and Fleming, P.J., An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization. Evol. Comput., 1995, 3(1), 1-16.
7. Graf, J., Interactive evolutionary algorithms in design, In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms (ICANNGA), 1995, pp. 227-230.
8. Kim, H.S. and Cho, S.B., An efficient genetic algorithm with less fitness evaluation by clustering, in Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2001, pp. 887-894.
9. Machwe, A. and Parmee, I.C., Integrating aesthetic criteria with evolutionary processes in complex, free-form design - an initial investigation, in Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, in electronic format.
10. Machwe, A. and Parmee, I.C., Towards an interactive, generative, design system: integrating a 'build and evolve' approach with machine learning for complex freeform design, in Evo-INTERACT, 2007 pp. 449-4-58.
11. Machwe, A., Parmee, I.C. and Miles, J.C., Overcoming representation issues when including aesthetic criteria in evolutionary design, in Proceedings of ASCE International Conference in Civil Engineering, 2005a, in electronic format.
12. Machwe, A., Parmee, I.C. and Miles, J.C., Integrating aesthetic criteria with a user-centric evolutionary system via a component based design representation, in Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, 2005b, in electronic format.
13. Moore, C.J., Miles, J.C. and Evans, S.J.N., Establishing a knowledge base for bridge aesthetics. Struct, Eng. Rev., 1996, 8(2-3), 247-258.
14. Moshaiov, A. and Avigad, G., Multi-objective path planning by the concept-based IEC method, in Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference, on Computational Cybernetics, 2004, pp. 115-120.
15. Parmee, I.C., S upporting innovation and creativity through interactive evolutionary systems, in Proceedings Creativity and Cognition 4, 2002 (Poster).
16. Parmee, I.C. and Abraham, J. A., Supporting implicit learning via the visualisation of COGA multi-objective data, in Proceedings of IEEE International Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2004, pp. 395-402.
17. Road and Traffic Authority, Bridge Aesthetics: Design Guidelines to Improve the Appearance of Bridges in New South Wales. RTA, New South Wales, RTA/Pub 04.003, 2004.
18. Rosenman, M. and Gero, J., Evolving designs by generating useful complex gene structures. In Evolutionary Design by Computers, edited by P.J. Bentley, 1999 (Morgan Kaufmann: San Fransisco, CA).
19. Sims, K., Evolving virtual creatures, in Computer Graphics Proceedings, July 1994, pp. 15-22.
20. Takagi, H., Interactive evolutionary computation: cooperation of computational intelligence and human KANSEI, in Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Soft Computing and Information / Intelligent Systems (IIZUKA), 1998, pp. 41-50.
21. Takagi, H., Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capacities of EC optimization and human evaluation. Proc. IEEE, 2001, 89(9), 1275-1296.
22. Wood, W.H. and Agogino, A.M., A case-based conceptual design information server for concurrent engineering. Comput.-Aided Des. J., 1996, 28(5), 361-369.
23. Xu, L. et al., A polychromatic sets approach to the conceptual design of machine tools. Int. J. Product. Res., 2005, 43(12), 2397-2421.
24. Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L., Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 1999, 3(4), 257-271.
25. Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L., SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, TIK Report 103, 2001. Available online at: http://e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/ ecolpool/incoll/incoll_324.pdf