The first high-order CFD simulation of aircraft: Challenges and opportunities

Collection of Technical Papers - 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting

Volumn 24, Issue , 2006, Pages 18161-18183

  Ladeinde, Foluso ^a,c   Alabi, Ken ^a,c   Safta, Cosmin ^a,c   Cai, Xiaodan ^a,c   Johnson, Forrester ^b,c,d  

^a Thaerocomp Technical Corporation   (United States)

^b BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

^c AIAA   (United States)

^d Aerodynamics Research Engineering

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE SYSTEMS; CANONICAL PROBLEMS; HIGH-ORDER SCHEMES; WEIGHTED ESSENTIALLY NON-OSCILLATORY (WENO);

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUST CONTROL;

AIRCRAFT;

EID: 34250903047     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A. and Zang, T. A. 1987. Spectral methods in fluid dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York
2. Lele, S.K. 1992 1992. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comp. Phys. 103, pp. 16-42.
3. Tam, C.K.W. and Webb, J.C. 1993. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics J. Comp. Phys. 107, pp. 262
4. Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S. and Chakravarthy, S. 1987. Uniformly high order essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III, J. Comp. Phys. 71, pp. 231-303.
5. Liu, X. D., Osher, S. and Chan, T. 1994. Weighted essentially- nonoscillatory schemes, J. Comp. Phys. 115, pp. 200-212.
6. Jiang, G. and Shu, C.-W. 1996. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comp. Phys. 126, pp. 202-228.
7. Shu, C.-W., 1997, "Essentially Non-Oscillatory and Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws," NASA CR-97-206253, ICASE Rep. No. 97-65.
8. Gaitonde, D. and Visbai, M.R., "High-Order Schemes for Navier-Stokes Equations: Algorithm and Implementation intoFDL3DI", Technical Report # AFRL-VA-WP-TR-1998-3060, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH (1998).
9. Visbal, M. R. and Gaitonde, D. V. 2002. On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes, J. Comp. Phys. 181, pp. 155-185
10. Safta, C., Alabi, K. and Ladeinde, F., 2006, "Comparative Advantages of High-Order Schemes for Subsonic, Transonic, and Supersonic Flows," AIAA 2006-0299.
11. Adam, N. A. and Shariff, K. 1996. A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems, J. Comp. Phys. 127, pp. 27-51.
12. Weirs, V. G. and Candler, G. V. 1997. Optimization of weighted ENO schemes for DNS of compressible turbulence, AIAA 97-1940
13. Germano, M, Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W.H., 1991, "A Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Viscosity Model," Phys. Fluids A 3(7), 1760.
14. Moin, P., Squires, K., Cabot, W.H., and Lee, S., 1991, "A Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Model for Compressible Turbulence and Scalar Transport," Phys. Fluids A 3(11), 2746.
15. Lilly, D., 1992, "A Proposed Modification of the Germano Subgrid-Scale Closure Model," Phys. Fluids A 4, 633.
16. Spalart, P.R., and Allmaras, S.R., "A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows," La Rech. A 'erospatiale, V. 1, 1994, pp.5-21.
17. Strelets, M., "Detached Eddy Simulation of Massively Separated Flows," AIAA 2001-0879. (Strelets, 2001)
18. Menter, F.R., Kuntz, M., and Bender, R., "A scale-adaptive simulation model for turbulent flow predictions," AIAA 2003-0767.
19. Shih, T.-H. and Liu, N.-S., "Partially resolved numerical simulation: from RANS towards LES for engine turbulent flows," AIAA 2004-0160.
20. Shih, T.-H. and Liu, N.-S., "A unified strategy for numerical simulation of turbulent flows," private communication, 2005.
21. Pulliam, H. T. and Chaussee, D. S. 1981. A diagonal form of an implicit approximate-factorization algorithm J. Comp. Phys. 39 (2), pp. 347.
22. Ladeinde, F. 1995. Supersonic Flux-Split Procedure for Second Moments of Turbulence. AIAA Journal, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 1185-1195.
23. th AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, June 28-30, 1993.
24. Driver, D. M. and Seegmiller, H.L. "Features of a reattaching turbulent shear layer in devergent channel flow," AIAA Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2. Feb. 1985, pp. 163-171.
25. Schmitt, V. and Charpin, F. "Pressure Distributions on the Onera-M6-Wing at Transonic Mach Numbers," Experimental Data Base for Computer Program Assessment. Report of the Fluid Dynamics Panel Working Group 04, AGARD AR 138, May 1979.
26. Anonymous (1998) NPARC Alliance Validation Archive Backwards-Facing Step: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/backstep/backstep01/backstep01.html. 1998.
27. Jameson A., 1995, "Analysis and Design of Numerical Schemes for Gas Dynamics 1 Artificial Diffusion, Upwind Biasing, Limiters and Their Effect on Accuracy and Multigrid Convergence," RIACS Technical Report 94.15, Intl. J. of Comp. Fluid Dyn. 4, 171.
28. Ladeinde, F., Cai, X., Visbal, M.R., & Gaitonde, D. 2001. Turbulence Spectra Characteristics of High Order Schemes for Direct and Large Eddy Simulation. J. Applied Numerical Mathematics Vol. 36 (2001), pp. 447-474.