Orthographic neighborhood size effects in recognition memory

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 365-371

  Glanc, Gina A ^a   Greene, Robert L ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; VERBAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 34250896693     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193457     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ATKINSON, R. C., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 90-195). New York: Academic Press.
2. CARY, M., & REDER, L. M. (2003). A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 231-248.
3. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. CORTESE, M. J., WATSON, J. M., WANG, J., & FUGETT, A. (2004). Relating distinctive orthographic and phonological processes to episodic memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 32, 632-639.
5. CRAIK, F. I. M., & LOCKHART, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
6. CRISS, A. H., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (2004). Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 778-786.
7. DIANA, R. A., PETERSON, M. J., & REDER, L. M. (2004). The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 150-156.
8. DONALDSON, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 523-533.
9. DUNN, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review, 111, 524-542.
10. GARDINER, J. M., & RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229-244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
12. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 5-16.
13. GLANZER, M., ADAMS, J. K., IVERSON, G. J., & KIM, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
14. GLANZER, M., & BOWLES, N. (1976). Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 21-31.
15. GUTTENTAG, R. E., & CARROLL, D. (1994). Identifying the basis for the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Memory, 2, 255-273.
16. HILFORD, A., GLANZER, M., & KIM, K. (1997). Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Symmetry in motion. Memory & Cognition, 25, 593-605.
17. HIRSHMAN, E., & ARNDT, J. (1997). Discriminating alternative concepts of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1306-1323.
18. HIRSHMAN, E., & JACKSON, E. (1997). Distinctive perceptual processing and memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 2-12.
19. HUNT, R. R., & ELLIOTT, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 49-74.
20. JOORDENS, S., & HOCKLEY, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1534-1555.
21. KIM, K., & GLANZER, M. (1993). Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 638-652.
22. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
23. MALMBERG, K. J., STEYVERS, M., STEPHENS, J. D., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (2002). Feature frequency effects in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 607-613.
24. REDER, L. M., NHOUYVANISVONG, A., SCHUNN, C. D., AYERS, M. S., ANGSTADT, P., & HIRAKI, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 294-320.
25. WAUGH, N. C., & NORMAN, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.
26. ZECHMEISTER, E. B. (1972). Orthographic distinctiveness as a variable in word recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 85, 425-430.
27. ZIEGLER, J. C., & PERRY, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68, B53-B62.
28. ZIEGLER, J. C., STONE, G. O., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600-618.