Assessing lumbar sagittal motion using videography in an in vivo pilot study

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 653-656

  Craig Humphreys, S ^a   Hodges, Scott D ^a   Lumpkin, Kelly J ^a   Eck, Jason C ^b   Wurster, Rebecca ^a   Hagen, Justin ^a   Farmer, Danielle ^a  

^a Center for Sports Medicine and Orthopaedics Chattanooga   (United States)

^b Memorial Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Lumbar spine; Motion

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DATA ACQUISITION;

LUMBAR SPINE MOTION; MOTION ANALYSIS; VIDEOGRAPHY;

ERGONOMICS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ERGONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IN VIVO STUDY; LONGEVITY; LUMBAR DISK; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE MOBILITY; VIDEOGRAPHY; VIDEORECORDING; WORK SCHEDULE;

EID: 34250887479     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ainsworth B. Issues in the assessment of physical activity in women. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 71 (2000) 37-51
2. Feipel V., DeMesmacker T., Klein P., et al. Three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbar spine during treadmill walking at different speeds. European Spine Journal 10 (2001) 16-22
3. Hallab N., Link H., and McAfee P. Biomaterial optimization in total disc arthroplasty. Spine 28 (2003) S139-S152
4. Harris Interactive [database on the Internet]. Rochester (NY). Different leisure activities' popularity rise and fall, but reading, TV watching and family time still top the list of favorites. c2004 [cited December 8, 2004]. 〈http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=526〉.
5. Hsieh C., and Pringle P. Range of motion of the lumbar spine required for four activities of daily living. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 17 6 (1994) 353-358
6. Huang R., Girardi F., Cammisa F., et al. The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement. Spine 28 (2003) 412-417
7. Lee R., and Wong T. Relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip. Human Movement Science 21 (2002) 481-494
8. Lee S., Wong K., Chan M., et al. Development and validation of a new technique for assessing lumbar spine motion. Spine 27 (2002) E215-E220
9. Lund T., Nydegger T., Schlenzka D., et al. Three-dimensional motion patterns during active bending in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 27 (2002) 1865-1874
10. Mannion A., and Troke M. A comparison of two motion analysis devices used in the measurement of lumbar spinal mobility. Clinical Biomechanics 14 (1999) 612-619
11. McGregor A., Anderton L., Gedroyc W., et al. Assessment of spinal kinematics using open interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical Orthopaedics 392 (2001) 341-348
12. Menezes A., Davies K., Hukins D., et al. Measurements of the time course of bending of the back in the sagittal plane. European Spine Journal 4 (1995) 24-28
13. Miyasaka K., Ohmori K., Suzuki K., et al. Radiographic analysis of lumbar motion in relation to lumbrosacral stability. Spine 25 (2001) 732-737
14. Murdock M., Bonin V., Deuretzbacher G., et al. Determination of the in vivo loading of the lumbar spine with a new approach directly at the workplace-first results for nurses. Clinical Biomechanics 15 (2000) 549-558
15. Rohlmann A., Claes L., Bergmann G., et al. Comparison of intradiscal pressures and spinal fixator loads for different body positions and exercise. Ergonomics 44 (2001) 781-794
16. Singh K., Vaccaro A., and Albert T. Assessing the potential impact of total disc arthroplasty on surgeon practice patterns in North America. Spine Journal 4 (2004) 195S-201S
17. Steffen T., Rubin R., Baramki H., et al. A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo. Spine 22 (1997) 156-166
18. Van Dieen J., Dekkers J., Groen V., et al. Within-subject variability in low back load in a repetitively performed, mildly constrained lifting task. Spine 26 (2001) 1799-1804