Stented versus stentless bioprostheses in aortic valve stenosis: Effect on left ventricular remodelling

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 121-126

  Tsialtas, Dimitri ^a   Bolognesi, Roberto ^a   Beghi, Cesare ^a   Albertini, Daniela ^a   Bolognesi, Maria Giulia ^a   Manca, Carlo ^a   Gherli, Tiziano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VENTRICLE REMODELING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT; VENTRICULAR REMODELING;

EID: 34250885098     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20061163     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arom KV, Nicoloff DM, Kersten TE, et al. 1987. St. Jude Medical prostheses: valve related deaths and complications. Ann Thorac Surg 43:591-8.
2. Back DS. 2000. Echocardiography assessment of stentless aortic bioprosthetic valves. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 13:941-8.
3. Black MM, Cochrane T, Lawford PV, Reul H, Yoganathan A. 1976. Design and flow characteristics. In: Bodnar E, Frater R, eds. Replacement Cardiac Valves. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1-20.
4. Christakis GT, Joyner CD, Morgan CD, et al. 1996. Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 62:1084-9.
5. Cohen G, Christakis GT, Joyner CD, et al. 2002. Are the stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 73:767-78.
6. Czer LSC, Chaux A, Motloff JM, et al. 1990. Ten years experience with the St. Jude mechanical valve for primary valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 100:44-5.
7. David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feimdel CM, Cohen G. 2001. Late results of heart replacement with the Hancock 2 bioprostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:268-77.
8. Del Rizzo DF, Wender O, Christakis GT, David TE. 1996. Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:143-5.
9. De Paulis R, Sommariva L, Colagrande L, et al. 1998. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with different valve substitutes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:590-8.
10. Devereux RB, Reichek N. 1977. Echocardiography determination of left ventricular mass in man. Circulation 55:614-8.
11. Fries R, Wender O, Schieffer H, Schäfers HJ. 2000. Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamic of 23 mm stentless versus 23 mm stented aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 69:817-22.
12. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Hendersen MG, Glover FL, Prian C, Rahimtoola SH. 2000. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the veterans affair randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1152-8.
13. Jin XY, Pepper JR. 2002. Do stentless valves make a difference? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22:95-100.
14. Jin XY, Westaby S. 1999. Aortic root geometry and stentless porcine valve competence. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 11:145-50.
15. Levinson GE, Alpert JE. Aortic stenosis. 2000. In: Alport JS, Dalen JE, Rahimtoola SH, eds. Valvular Heart Disease Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 183-243.
16. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DP, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. 1989. Left ventricular mass and incidence of coronary heart disease in an elderly cohort: The Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med 110:101-7.
17. Perez de Arenaza D, Lees B, Flather M, et al. 2005. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis. Effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation 112:2696-702.
18. Rao V, Jamieson WRE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. 2000. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 102;(suppl III):III5-III9.
19. Re GW, Grunkemeier GL, Gately RL, Fumary AP, Starr A. 1995. Up to thirty-years survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root. Ann Thorac Surg 59:1056-62.
20. Salcedo EE, Korzick DH, Curric PJ, Stewart WJ, Lever HM, Garmastic M. 1989. Determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis. Clevel Clin J Med 56:590-6.
21. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. 1989. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocard 2:358-67.
22. Walther T, Falk V, Langerbartels G, Kruger M. 1999. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves: impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 100(suppl 2II):II6-II10.
23. Westaby S, Horton M, Jin XY, et al. 2000. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses, Oxford Heart Centre. Ann Thorac Surg 70:785-91.