Subadult female experience does not influence species recognition in the wolf spider Schizocosa uetzi Stratton 1997

Journal of Arachnology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-10

  Hebets, Eileen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

Author keywords

Araneae; Cannibalism; Experience; Lycosidae; Mate choice; Species recognition

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE; INVERTEBRATA; LYCOSIDAE; SCHIZOCOSA UETZI; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 34250881586     PISSN: 01618202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1636/S05-76.1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barth, F.G. 1986. Vibration sense and vibratory umwelt of spiders. Naturwissenschaften 73:519-530.
2. Bateson, R 1966. The characteristics and context of imprinting. Biological Reviews 41:177-220.
3. Bradbury, J.W. & S.L. Vehrencamp. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 882 pp.
4. Brooks, R. 1998. The importance of mate copying and cultural inheritance of mating preferences. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:45-46.
5. Coleman, S.W., G.L Patricelli & G. Borgia. 2004. Variable female preferences drive complex male displays. Nature 428:742-745.
6. Costa, F.G. & G. Francescoli. 1991. Analyse expérimentale de l'isolement reproductif entre deux espèces jumelles et sympatriques d'araignées: le Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling) et le Lycosa carbonelli Costa et Capocasale. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 69: 1768-1776.
7. Dugatkin, L.A. 1992a. Reversal of female mate choice by copying. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 249:179-184.
8. Dugatkin, L.A. 1992b. Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. American Naturalist 139:1384-1389.
9. Dugatkin, L.A. 1996a. Copying and mate choice. Pp. 85-106. In Social Learning in Animals: the Roots of Culture (C.M. Heyes & B.G. Galef, Jr., eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, California.
10. Dugatkin, L.A. 1996b. Interface between culturally based preferences and genetic preferences: Female mate choice in Poecilia reticulata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 93:2770-2773.
11. Fisher, R.A. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Second edition. Dover, New York. 291 pp.
12. Foelix, R.F. 1996. Biology of Spiders. Second edition. Oxford University Press, New York. 330 pp.
13. Freeberg, T.M. 2000. Culture and courtship in vertebrates: a review of social learning and transmission of courtship systems and mating patterns. Behavioural Processes 51:177-192.
14. Galef, B.G., Jr. & D.J. White. 2000. Evidence of social effects on mate choice in vertebrates. Behavioural Processes 51:167-175.
15. Gong, A. & R.M. Gibson. 1996. Reversal of a female preference after visual exposure to a predator in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Animal Behaviour 52:1007-1015.
16. Hauber, M.E., S.A. Russo & P.W. Sherman. 2001. A password for species recognition in a brood-parasitic bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 268: 1041-1048.
17. Hebets, E.A. 2002. Evolution and function of complex signaling in spider courtship behavior. Ecology and evolutionary biology. PhD dissertation. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
18. Hebets, E.A. 2003. Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:13390-13395.
19. Hebets, E.A. 2005. Attention-altering signal interactions in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa uetzi. Behavioral Ecology 16:75-82.
20. Hebets, E.A. & G.W. Uetz. 1999. Female responses to isolated signals from multimodal male courtship displays in the wolf spider genus Schizocosa (Araneae, Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour 57:86-872.
21. Immelmann, K. 1975. Ecological significance of imprinting and early learning. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 6:15-37.
22. Irwin, D.E. & T. Price. 1999. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 82:34-354.
23. Kendrick, K.M., M.R. Hinton, K. Atkins, M.A. Haupt & J.D. Skinner. 1998. Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature 395:229-230.
24. Laland, K.N. 1994. On the evolutionary consequences of sexual imprinting. Evolution 48:477-489.
25. Owens, I.P.F., C. Rowe & A.L.R Thomas. 1999. Sexual selection, speciation and imprinting: separating the sheep from the goats. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14:131-132.
26. Penn, D. & W. Potts. 1998. MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 265:1299-1306.
27. Rovner, J.S. 1975. Sound production by Nearctic wolf spiders: a substratum-coupled stridulatory mechanism. Science 190:1309-1310.
28. Rowe, C. 2002. Sound improves visual discrimination learning in avian predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 269:1353-1357.
29. Slagsvold, T., B.T. Hansen, L.E. Johannessen & J.T. Lifjeld. 2002. Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 269:1449-1455.
30. Soha, J.A. & P. Marler. 2000. A species-specific acoustic cue for selective song learning in the white-crowned sparrow. Animal Behaviour 60: 297-306.
31. Stratton, G.E. 1983. Comparison of courtship behaviors and interspecific crosses in the Schizocosa ocreata species complex (Araneae, Lycosidae). American Zoologist 23:967-967.
32. Stratton, G.E. 1991. A new species of wolf spider, Schizocosa stridulans (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 19:29-39.
33. Stratton, G.E. 1997. A new species of Schizocosa from the southeastern USA (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 25:84-92.
34. Stratton, G.E. 2005. Evolution of ornamentation and courtship behavior in Schizocosa: insights from a phylogeny based on morphology (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 33: 347-376.
35. Stratton, G.E. & G.W. Uetz. 1981. Acoustic communication and reproductive isolation in two species of wolf spiders. Science 214:575-577.
36. Stratton, G.E. & G.W. Uetz. 1983. Communication via substratum-coupled stridulation and reproductive isolation in wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour 31:164-172.
37. Stratton, G.E. & G.W. Uetz. 1986. The inheritance of courtship behavior and its role as a reproductive isolating mechanism in two species of Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). Evolution 40:129-141.
38. ten Cate, C. 1993. Sexual imprinting and song learning: two of one kind? Netherlands Journal of Zoology 43:34-45.
39. ten Cate, C. & D.R. Vos. 1999. Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: a reassessment. Advances in the Study of Animal Behaviour 28:1-31.
40. Uetz, G.W. & J.A. Roberts. 2002. Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 59:222-230.
41. White, D.J. 2004. Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions. Learning & Behavior 32: 105-113.
42. White, D.J. & B.G. Galef, Jr. 2000. 'Culture' in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica. Animal Behaviour 59: 975-979.
43. Wiley, R.H. 1994. Errors, exaggeration, and deception in animal communication. Pp. 157-189. In Behavioral Mechanisms in Evolutionary Ecology (L.A. Real, ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.