Systemic issues and correctional outcomes: Expanding the scope of correctional psychology

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 919-932

  Clements, Carl B ^a   Althouse, Richard ^b   Ax, Robert K ^c   Magaletta, Phillip R ^d   Fagan, Thomas J ^e   Wormith, J Stephen ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^b Wisconsin Department of Corrections   (United States)

^c Federal Bureau of Prisons ^*

^d FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS   (United States)

^e NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Correctional psychologists; Justice policy; Prison environments; Program assessment; Segregation; Social inclusion theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250874048     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854807301561     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Abramsky, S., Ross, J. (2003). Ill-equipped: U.S. prisons and offenders with mental illness. New York: Human Rights Watch.
2. American Association for Correctional Psychology (AACP; now known as American Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology). (2000). Standards for Psychology Services in jails, prisons, correctional facilities, and agencies: 2 nd edition. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 433-494.
3. Anderson, V., Johnson, L. (1997). Systems thinking basics: From concepts to causal loops. Walthan, MA: Pegasus Communications.
4. Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.) Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
5. Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., Wormith, J.S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
6. Aos, S., Miller, M., Drake, E. (2006, January). Evidence-based adult corrections programs: What works and what does not. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
7. Baumeister, R.F., DeWall, C.N., Ciarocco, N.J., Twenge, J.M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589-604.
8. Becket, K., Sasson, T. (2000). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
9. Blaauw, E. (2005). Bullying and suicides in prison. In J. L. Ireland (Ed.), Bullying among prisoners: Innovations in theory and research (pp. 44-61). Portland, OR: Willan.
10. Boothby, J.L., Clements, C.B. (2000). A national survey of correctional psychologists. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 716-732.
11. Brodsky, S.L., Scogin, F.R. (1988). Inmates in protective custody: First data on emotional effects. Forensic Reports, 1, 267-280.
12. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Criminal offender statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
13. Clear, T. (1994). Harm in American penology: Offenders, victims, and their communities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14. Clements, C.B. (1982). Psychological roles and issues in recent prison litigation. In J. Gunn D. Farrington (Eds.), Current research in forensic psychiatry and psychology: Vol. 1 (pp. 37-59). London: Wiley.
15. Clements, C.B., McLearen, A.M. (2003). Research-based practice in corrections: A selective review. In T. Fagan and R. Ax (Eds.), Correctional mental health handbook (pp. 273-302). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Cloyes, K., Lovell, D., Allen, D.G., Rhodes, L.A. (2006). Assessment of psychosocial impairment in a supermaximum security unit sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 760-781.
17. Colorado Department of Corrections. (n.d.). Analysis of Colorado's administrative segregation Retrieved from http://www.doc.state.co.us/statistics/ pdfs/Other/AdSegReport.pdf
18. Cooper, C., Berwick, S. (2001). Factors affecting psychological well-being of three groups of suicide-prone prisoners. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 20, 169-182.
19. Davis, A.Y. (2003). Are prisons obsolete ? New York: Seven Stories.
20. DeBerry, S. (1987). Necessary factors in psychotherapy: A model for understanding iatrogenic disturbances. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 17, 235-249.
21. Desrosiers, J.L., Reitzel, L.R. (2005). Sexual offender update: Consequences of notification and registration laws. The Correctional Psychologist, 37, 1-3.
22. Di Placido, C., Simon, T.L., Witte, T.D., Gu, D., Wong, S.C.P. (2006). Treatment of gang members can reduce recidivism and institutional misconduct. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 93-114.
23. Ditton, P.M. (1999). Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers (NCJ 1744 63). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
24. Dooley, E. (1990). Unnatural deaths in prison. British Journal of Criminology, 30, 229-234.
25. Dumond, R. (2000). Inmate sexual assault: The plague that persists. The Prison Journal, 80, 407-414.
26. Dunaway, R.G., Cullen, F.T., Burton, V.S., Jr., Evans, T.D. (2000). The myth of social class and crime revisited: An examination of class and adult criminality. Criminology, 38, 589-632.
27. DuRose, M.R., Mumola, C.J. (2004). Profile of nonviolent offenders exiting state prisons. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
28. Dyer, J. (2000). The perpetual prison machine. Boulder, CO: Westview.
29. Elliott, R.L. (1997). Evaluating the quality of correctional mental health services. Behavioral Science and the Law, 15, 427-438.
30. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 ( 1976 ).
31. Farmer, P. (2002). The house of the dead: Tuberculosis and prison. In M. Mauer M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 239-257). New York: The New Press.
32. Feeley, M.M., Rubin, E.L. (1998). Judicial policy making and the modern state: How the courts reformed America's prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Fleisher, M.S., Decker, S.H. (2001). Overview of the challenge of prison gangs. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 1-9.
34. French, S.A., Gendreau, P. (2006). Reducing prison misconducts: What works. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 185-218.
35. Gaes, G., Wallace, S., Gilman, E., Klein-Saffran, J., Suppa, S. (2001, March 9). The influence of prison gang affiliation on violence and other prison misconduct Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons.
36. Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 144-161.
37. Gendreau. P., Andrews, D.A. (2001). Correctional Program Assessment Inventory2000 (CPAI-2000) Saint John, Canada: University of New Brunswick.
38. Gendreau, P., Bonta, J. (1984). Solitary confinement is not cruel and unusual punishment: People sometimes are! Canadian Journal of Criminology, 26, 467-478.
39. Golder, S., Ivanoff, A., Cloud, R., Besel, K., McKiernan, P., Bratt, E., et al. (2005). Evidence-based practice with adults in jails and prisons: Strategies, practices, and future directions. Best Practice in Mental Health: An International Journal, 1, 100-132.
40. Grassian, S. (1983). Psychopathological effects of solitary confinement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 1450-1454.
41. Greenfeld, L.A., Smith, S.K. (1999). American Indians and crime (NCJ 1733 86). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
42. Grey, M. (1998). Drug crazy. New York: Random House.
43. Griffin, M., Hepburn, J. (2006). The effect of gang affiliation on violent misconduct among inmates during the early years of confinement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 419-466.
44. Haney, C. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and supermax confinement. Crime Delinquency, 49, 124-156.
45. Haney, C. (2006). Reforming punishment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46. Haney, C., Banks, W., Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69-97.
47. Haney, C., Zimbardo, P.G. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53, 709-729.
48. Harlow, C.W. (2003). Education and correctional populations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
49. Harris, P.M., Gingerich, R., Whittaker, T.A. (2004). The effectiveness of differential supervision. Crime Delinquency, 50, 235-271.
50. Hayes, L. (1999). Suicide in adult correctional facilities: Key ingredients to prevention and overcoming the obstacles. Journal of Law, Medicine, Ethics, 27, 260-268.
51. Hochstetler, A., Murphy, D.S., Simons, R.L. (2004). Damaged goods: Exploring predictors of distress in prison inmates. Crime Delinquency, 50, 436-457.
52. Hollin, C. (2002). Does punishment motivate offenders to change ? In M. McMurran (Ed.), Motivating offenders to change. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
53. Jackson, M. (1983). Prisoners of isolation: Solitary confinement in Canada. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
54. Kim, D.H. (1992). Systems archetypes. Cambridge, MA: Pegasus Communications.
55. Korn, R. (1988). The effects of confinement in the high security unit at Lexington. Social Justice, 15, 1-20.
56. Kupers, T. (1999). Prison madness: The mental health crisis behind bars and what we must do about it. New York: John Wiley/Jossey-Bass.
57. Landenberger, N., Lipsey, M. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451-476.
58. Lawrence, S., Mears, D.P., Dubin, G., Travis, J. (2002). The practice and promise of prison programming. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
59. Losel, F. (1995). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
60. Lovell, D., Cloyes, K., Allen, D.G., Rhodes, L.A. (2000). Who lives in super maximum custody? A Washington State study. Federal Probation, 61, 40-45.
61. Lovell, D., Jemelka, R. (1996). When inmates misbehave: The costs of discipline. The Prison Journal, 76, 165-179.
62. Lowenkamp, C.T., Smith, P., Latessa, E.J. (in press). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy.
63. MacNeil, J.R., Lobato, M.N., Moore, M. (2005). An unanswered health disparity: Tuberculosis among correctional inmates, 1993 through 2003. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1800-1805.
64. Magaletta, P.R., Ax, R.K., Patry, M.W., Dietz, E.F. (2005). Clinical practice in segregation: The crucial role of psychologists. Corrections Today, 67, 34-37.
65. Magaletta, P.R., Patry, M.W., Dietz, E.F., Ax, R.K. (2007). What is correctional about clinical practice in corrections? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 7-21.
66. Maltz, R. (1984). Recidivism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
67. McGuire, J. (2001). What works in correctional intervention ? In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice (pp. 25-43). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
68. McKay, R.B. (1972). Attica: The official report of the New York State Special Commission on Attica. New York: Bantam Books.
69. Moos, R.H. (1975). Evaluating correctional and community settings. New York: John Wiley.
70. Moos, R.H. (2005). Iatrogenic effects of psychosocial interventions for substance abuse disorders. Addiction, 100, 595-604.
71. Morris, N. (1974). The future of imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. Mumola, C.J. (2005). Suicide and homicide in state prisons and local jails. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
73. National Commission on Correctional Health Care. (n.d.). NCCHC health services accreditation. Chicago: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ncchc.org/ accred/AccredBrochure.pdf
74. Parke, R.D., Clarke-Stewart, K.A. (2001, December). Effects of parental incarceration on young children. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
75. Phillips, R.L., McConnell, C.R. (2003). The effective correctional manager: Maximizing staff performance in demanding times. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Barlett.
76. Pogorzelski, W., Wolff, N., Pan, K-Y., Blitz, C.L. (2005). Behavioral health problems, ex-offender reentry policies, and the Second Chance Act. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1718-1724.
77. Pratt, D., Piper, M., Appleby, L., Webb, R., Shaw, J. (2006). Suicide in recently released prisoners: A population-based cohort study. Lancet, 368, 119-123.
78. Restum, Z. (2005). Public health implications of substandard correctional health care. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1689-1691.
79. Rhodes, L.A. (2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. Berkeley: University of California Press.
80. Rice, M.E., Harris, G.T., Cormier, C.A. (1992). An evaluation of a maximum security therapeutic community for psychopaths and other mentally disordered offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 399-412.
81. Ruiz v. Johnson, 37 F. Supp. 2d, 855 (S.D. Texas, 1999).
82. Schaefer, N., Stefancic, A. (2003). Alternative to prison programs for the mentally ill offender. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 38, 41-56.
83. Schlosser, E. (1998, December). The prison-industrial complex. The Atlantic Monthly, 282 (6). 51-77.
84. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
85. Skeem, J.L., Monahan, J., Mulvey, E.P. (2002). Psychopathy, treatment involvement, and subsequent violence among civil psychiatric patients. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 577-603.
86. Sly, A., Taylor, K. (2005) Evaluation of psychosocial rehabilitation within the women's structured living environments (No. R-163) Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.
87. Stack, S.J., Tsoudis, O. (1997). Suicide risk among correctional officers: A logistic regression analysis. Archives of Suicide Research, 3, 183-186.
88. Sturr, C. (2006, January/February). The political economy of the prison crisis: An introduction. Dollars and Sense, pp. 8-9.
89. Suedfeld, P., Ramirez, C., Deaton, J., Baker-Brown, G. (1982). Reactions and attributes of prisoners in solitary confinement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 303-340.
90. Toch, H., Adams, K., Grant, J.D., Lord, E. (2002). Acting out: Maladaptive behavior in confinement. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
91. Tonry, M. (2004). Has the prison a future ? In M. Tonry (Ed.), The future of imprisonment (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
92. Travis, J., Waul, M. (Eds.). (2003). Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
93. Ventura, L., Cassel, C., Jacoby, J., Huang, B. (1998). Case management and recidivism of mentally ill persons released from jail. Psychiatric Services, 49, 1330-1337.
94. Waters, J.E., Megathlin, W.L. (2002). Evaluating change in social climate in a close security state correctional facility. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34, 71-84.
95. Webb, L.R. (2003). Building constructive prison environments: The functional utility of applying behavior analysis in prisons. The Behavior Analyst Today, 4, 71-77.
96. Welch, M. (1999). Punishment in America: Social control and the ironies of imprisonment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
97. Welch, M. (2005). The ironies of imprisonment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
98. Wenk, E., Moos, R.H. (1972). Social climate in prison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 9, 134-148.
99. Wormith, J.S., Althouse, R., Simpson, M., Reitzel, L.R., Fagan, T.J., Morgan, R.D. (2007). The rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders: The current landscape and some future directions for correctional psychology. Criminal Justice Behavior, 34, 879-892.
100. Wormith, J.S., Olver, M.E. (2002). Offender treatment attrition and its relationship with risk, responsivity and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 447-471.
101. Wright, K.N. (1991). The violent and victimized in the male prison. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 16, 1-25.
102. Wright, K.N. (2005). Designing a national performance measurement system. The Prison Journal, 85, 368-393.
103. Youngken, M. (2000, August). The Commission on Accreditation for Corrections: Raising the bar of excellence. Corrections Today, 62, 98.
104. Zinger, I., Wichmann, C., Andrews, D.A. (2001). The psychological effects of 60 days in administrative segregation. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43, 47-83.