In Vivo Crosslinking Methods for Analyzing the Assembly and Architecture of Chemoreceptor Arrays

Methods in Enzymology

Volumn 423, Issue , 2007, Pages 414-431

  Studdert, Claudia A ^a   Parkinson, John S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN HISTIDINE KINASE;

CHEMORECEPTOR; GENETIC VARIABILITY; IN VIVO STUDY; MACROMOLECULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 34250873448     PISSN: 00766879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)23019-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Ames P., Studdert C.A., Reiser R.H., and Parkinson J.S. Collaborative signaling by mixed chemoreceptor teams in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 7060-7065
2. Bray D., Levin M., and Morton-Firth C. Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity. Nature 393 (1998) 85-88
3. Chelsky D., and Dahlquist F.W. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: Associations of protein components. Biochemistry 19 (1980) 4633-4639
4. Feng X., Baumgartner J.W., and Hazelbauer G.L. High- and low-abundance chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli: Differential activities associated with closely related cytoplasmic domains. J. Bacteriol. 179 (1997) 6714-6720
5. Gestwicki J.E., Lamanna A.C., Harshey R.M., McCarter L.L., Kiessling L.L., and Adler J. Evolutionary conservation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein location in Bacteria and Archaea. J. Bacteriol. 182 (2000) 6499-6502
6. Gosink K.K., Buron-Barral M., and Parkinson J.S. Signaling interactions between the aerotaxis transducer Aer and heterologous chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 188 (2006) 3487-3493
7. Homma M., Shiomi D., and Kawagishi I. Attractant binding alters arrangement of chemoreceptor dimers within its cluster at a cell pole. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 3462-3467
8. Hulko M., Berndt F., Gruber M., Linder J.U., Truffault V., Schultz A., Martin J., Schultz J.E., Lupas A.N., and Coles M. The HAMP domain structure implies helix rotation in transmembrane signaling. Cell 126 (2006) 929-940
9. Irieda H., Homma M., and Kawagishi I. Control of chemotactic signal gain via modulation of a pre-formed receptor array. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 23880-23886
10. Kentner D., Thiem S., Hildenbeutel M., and Sourjik V. Determinants of chemoreceptor cluster formation in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 61 (2006) 407-417
11. Kim K.K., Yokota H., and Kim S.H. Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor. Nature 400 (1999) 787-792
12. Kim S.H., Wang W., and Kim K.K. Dynamic and clustering model of bacterial chemotaxis receptors: Structural basis for signaling and high sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 11611-11615
13. Kosower N.S., and Kosower E.M. Diamide: An oxidant probe for thiols. Methods Enzymol. 251 (1995) 123-133
14. Lybarger S.R., and Maddock J.R. Differences in the polar clustering of the high- and low-abundance chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 8057-8062
15. Maddock J.R., and Shapiro L. Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. Science 259 (1993) 1717-1723
16. Milburn M.V., Prive G.G., Milligan D.L., Scott W.G., Yeh J., Jancarik J., Koshland Jr. D.E., and Kim S.H. Three-dimensional structures of the ligand-binding domain of the bacterial aspartate receptor with and without a ligand. Science 254 (1991) 1342-1347
17. Milligan D.L., and Koshland Jr. D.E. Site-directed cross-linking. Establishing the dimeric structure of the aspartate receptor of bacterial chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 263 (1988) 6268-6275
18. Park S.Y., Borbat P.P., Gonzalez-Bonet G., Bhatnagar J., Pollard A.M., Freed J.H., Bilwes A.M., and Crane B.R. Reconstruction of the chemotaxis receptor-kinase assembly. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13 (2006) 400-407
19. Parkinson J.S., Ames P., and Studdert C.A. Collaborative signaling by bacterial chemoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8 (2005) 116-121
20. Ritz D., and Beckwith J. Roles of thiol-redox pathways in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55 (2001) 21-48
21. Sourjik V. Receptor clustering and signal processing in E. coli chemotaxis. Trends Microbiol. 12 (2004) 569-576
22. Sourjik V., and Berg H.C. Localization of components of the chemotaxis machinery of Escherichia coli using fluorescent protein fusions. Mol. Microbiol. 37 (2000) 740-751
23. Sourjik V., and Berg H.C. Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 123-127
24. Sourjik V., and Berg H.C. Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 428 (2004) 437-441
25. Studdert C.A., and Parkinson J.S. Crosslinking snapshots of bacterial chemoreceptor squads. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 2117-2122
26. Studdert C.A., and Parkinson J.S. Insights into the organization and dynamics of bacterial chemoreceptor clusters through in vivo crosslinking studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 15623-15628
27. Szurmant H., and Ordal G.W. Diversity in chemotaxis mechanisms among the bacteria and archaea. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68 (2004) 301-319
28. Zhulin I.B. The superfamily of chemotaxis transducers: From physiology to genomics and back. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 45 (2001) 157-198