Selection for specialist training: What can we learn from other countries?

British Medical Journal

Volumn 334, Issue 7607, 2007, Pages 1302-1304

  Jefferis, Tony ^a  

^a Oxford Deanery Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; GOVERNMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NEW ZEALAND; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; EDUCATION; HUMAN; JOB FINDING; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICINE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; JOB APPLICATION; SPECIALISM; SPECIALTIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 34250872211     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39238.447338.ad     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Brown MJ. Raging against MTAS. BMJ 2007;334:549.
2. Shannon C. MTAS - where are we now? BMJ 2007;334:824-5.
3. Delamothe T. Why the UK's Medical Training Application Service failed. BMJ 2007;334:543-4.
4. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Surgical education and training programme. www.surgeons.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section= Home&CONTENTID=13863&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm.
5. Australian Medical Association. Comparison of training conditions and vocational training costs in Australian specialist medical training pragrams. www.ama.com.au/web.nsf/doc/WEEN-6CY26T.