Claiming ownership: A response to Manning and Ginger

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 193-197

  Lachapelle, Paul R ^a   McCool, Stephen F ^b  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZINGIBER OFFICINALE;

EID: 34250859099     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920601052602     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Arendt, H. (1958) The human condition,, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
2. Barker, A., Chamberlain, H., Eyre, J., Gomez, B., Hofberger, J., Jones, J., Kingston, A., McBride, M., Robinson, K., Smith, D., Smith, M., Smith, M. and Ressetar, R. (2003) The role of collaborative groups in federal land and resource management: A legal analysis. J. Land Resources Environ. Law, 23, pp. 67-141.
3. Coggins, G. C. (1998) Regulating federal natural resources: A summary case against devolved collaboration. Ecol. Law Q., 25:4, pp. 602-610.
4. Dahl, R. (1957) The concept of power. Behav. Sci., 2, pp. 201-215.
5. Fischer, F. (2000) Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge, Duke University Press, Durham, NC
6. Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
7. (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions, Columbia University Press, New York
8. Hudson, B. (1979) Comparison of current planning theories: Counterparts and contradictions. J. Am. Plan. Assoc., 45:4, pp. 387-398.
9. Kemmis, D. (2003) Region 7: An innovative approach to planning on or near public lands. Land Use Law Zoning Dig., 55:8, pp. 3-9.
10. Lachapelle, P. R. and McCool, S. F. (2005) Exploring the concept of "ownership" in natural resource planning. Society Nat. Resources, 18:3, pp. 279-285.
11. Lee, K. N. (1993) Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment, Island Press, Washington, DC
12. McCloskey, M. (2000) Problems with using collaboration to shape environmental public policy. Valparaiso Univ. Law Rev., 34, pp. 423-434.
13. McCool, S. and Stankey, G. H. (2003) Advancing the dialogue of visitor management: Expanding beyond the culture of technical control, San Diego, CA
14. Nie, M. (2004) Statutory detail and administrative discretion in public lands governance: Arguments and alternatives. J. Environ. Law Litigat., 19:29, pp. 223-291.
15. Ostrom, V. (1997) The meaning of democracy and the vulnerability of democracies: A response to Tocqueville's challenge, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
16. Sandel, M. (1984) The procedural republic and the unencumbered self. Polit. Theory., 12:1, pp. 81-96.
17. Stankey, G. H., Clark, R. and Bormann, B. T. (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: Theory, concepts, and management institutions, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR
18. Williams, B. A. and Matheny, A. R. (1995) Democracy, dialogue, and environmental disputes: The contested languages of social regulation, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
19. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W. and Watson, A. E. (1992) Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sci., 14:1, pp. 29-46.
20. Yankelovich, D. (1991) Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY