Interactions between morphological and physiological drought responses in Eucalyptus microtheca

Silva Fennica

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 221-233

  Susiluoto, Sanna ^a   Berninger, Frank ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll fluorescence; Photosynthesis; Root shoot ratio; RuBP; Xylem permeability

Indexed keywords

DROUGHT; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY;

CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; PHYSIOLOGICAL DROUGHT; ROOT/SHOOT RATIO; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

FORESTRY;

COMPENSATION; DROUGHT STRESS; ECOMORPHOLOGY; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; ROOT-SHOOT RATIO; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TREE; XYLEM;

DROUGHT; EUCALYPTUS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; ROOTS; SEEDLINGS;

EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS MICROTHECA;

EID: 34250843143     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.292     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bachelard, E.P. 1986. Effects of soil moisture on the growth of seedlings of three eucalypt species. II growth effects. Australian Forest Research 16: 51-61.
2. 2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants from diverse origins. Planta 170: 489-504.
3. Bolhàr-Nordenkampf, H.R. & Öquist, G. 1993. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in photosynthesis research. In: Hall, D.O., Scurlock, J.M.O., Bolhàr-Nordenkampf, H.R., Leegood, R.C. & Long, S.P. (eds). Photosynthesis and production in a changing environment: a field and laboratory manual. Chapman & Hall, London. p. 193-205.
4. Bota, J., Medrano, H. & Flexas, J. 2004. Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress. New Phytologist 162: 671-681.
5. Boyer, J.S. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443-448.
6. Buckley, T.N., Miller, J.M. & Farquhar, G.D. 2002. The mathematics of linked optimalisation for water and nitrogen use in a canopy. Silva Fennica 36: 639-669.
7. Chaves, M.M. 1991. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany 42: 1-16.
8. Collatz, J., Ferrar, P.J. & Slatyer, R.O. 1976. Effects of water stress and differential hardening treatments on photosynthetic characteristics of a xeromorphic shrub, Eucalyptus socialis, F. Muell. Oecologia 23: 95-105.
9. CSIRO. 1979. Seeds section report no 1. Division of Forest research, CSIRO, Canberra.
10. Damesin, C. & Rambal, S. 1995. Field study of leaf photosynthetic performance by a Mediterranean deciduous oak tree (Quercus pubescens) during a severe summer drought. New Phytologist 131: 159-167.
11. Eamus, D., Myers, B., Duff, G. & Williams, D. 1999. Seasonal changes in photosynthesis of eight savanna tree species. Tree Physiology 19: 665-671.
12. FAO 1979. Eucalypts for planting. FAO Forestry Series. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome.
13. 2 exchange in field conditions. Silva Fennica 36: 625-637.
14. 3 plants: Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations revisited. Annals of Botany 89: 183-189.
15. 3 plants under drought. Functional Plant Biology 29: 1209-1215.
16. Franks, P.J., Gibson, A. & Bachelard, E.P. 1995. Xylem permeability and embolism susceptibility in seedlings of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. from two different climatic zones. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22: 15-21.
17. Gibson, A., Hubick, K.T. & Bachelard, E.P. 1991. Effects of abscisic acid on morphological and physiological responses to water stress in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Seedlings. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 18: 153-163.
18. - , Bachelard, E.P. & Hubick, K.T. 1995. Relationship between climate and provenance variation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22: 453-460.
19. Grassi, G., Meir, P., Cromer, D., Tompkins, D. & Jarvis, P.G. 2002. Photosynthetic parameters in seedlings of Eucalyptus grandis as affected by rate of nitrogen supply. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 1677-1688.
20. Gunasekera, D. & Berkowitz, G.A. 1993. Use of transgenic plants with ribulose1,5bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase antisense DNA to evaluate the rate limitation of photosynthesis under water stress. Plant Physiology 103: 629-635.
21. Kaiser, W. 1987. Effects of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity. Physiologia Plantarum 71: 142-149.
22. Krause, G.H. & Weis, E. 1991. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42: 313-349.
23. Li, C. 1999. Carbon isotope composition, water use efficiency and biomass productivity of Eucalyptus microtheca populations under different water supplies. Plant and Soil 214: 165-171.
24. _ 2000. Population differences in wateruse efficiency of Eucalyptus microtheca seedlings under different watering regimes. Physiologia Plantarum 108: 134-139.
25. _ & Wang, K. 2003. Differences in drought responses of three contrasting Eucalyptus microtheca F. Muell populations. Forest Ecology and Management 179: 377-385.
26. _ , Berninger, F., Koskela, J. & Sonninen, E. 2000. Drought responses of Eucalyptus microtheca provenances depend on seasonality of rainfall in their place of origin. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 231-238.
27. Long, S.P. & Bernacchi, C.J. 2003. Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 2393-2401.
28. Maxwell, K. & Johnson, G.N. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 659-668.
29. O'Grady, A.P., Eamus, D. & Hutley, L.B. 1999. Transpiration increases during the dry season: Patterns of tree water use in eucalypt openforests of northern Australia. Tree Physiology 19: 591-597.
30. Osório, J., Osório, M.L., Chaves, M.M. & Pereira, J.S. 1998. Water deficits are more important in delaying growth than in changing patterns of carbon allocation in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Physiology 18: 363-374.
31. Pereira, J.S. & Kozlowski, T.T. 1976. Leaf anatomy and water relations of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and E. globulus seedlings. Canadian Journal of Botany 54: 2868-2880.
32. Prior, L.D., Eamus, D. & Bowman, D.M.J.S. 2003. Leaf attributes in the seasonally dry tropics: a comparison of four habitats in northern Australia. Functional Ecology 17: 504-515.
33. Sánchez-Rodríguez, J., Martínez-Carrasco, R. & Pérez, P. 1997. Photosynthetic electron transport and carbon-reduction-cycle enzyme activities under long-term drought stress in Casuarina equisetifolia Forst. & Forst. Photosynthesis Research 52: 255-262.
34. Schulze, E.D., Williams, R.J., Farquhar, G.D., Schulze, W., Langridge, J., Miller, J.M. & Walker, B.H. 1998. Carbon and nitrogen isotope discrimination and nitrogen nutrition of trees along a rainfall gradient in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25: 413-425.
35. 2 assimilation rates. Australian Journal of Botany 50: 301-310.
36. Sinclair, R. 1980. Water potential and stomatal conductance of three Eucalyptus species in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia: Responses to summer drought. Australian Journal of Botany 28: 499-510.
37. Tambussi, E.A., Casadesus, J., Munné-Bosch, S. & Araus, J.L. 2002. Photoprotection in water-stressed plants of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum): changes in chlorophyll fluorescence, spectral signature and photosynthetic pigments. Functional Plant Biology 29: 35-44.
38. Tezara, W., Mitchell, V.J., Driscoll, S.D. & Lawlor, D.W. 1999. Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature 401: 914-917.
39. Tuomela, K. 1997. Physiological and morphological responses of Eucalyptus microtheca provenances to water availability in tropical drylands. Tropical Forestry Reports 13.
40. Warren, C.R., Adams, M.A. & Chen, Z. 2000. Is photosynthesis related to the concentrations of nitrogen and Rubisco in leaves of Australian native plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 407-416.
41. White, D.A., Turner, N.C. & Galbraith, J.H. 2000. Leaf water relations and stomatal behaviour of four allelopathic Eucalyptus species planted in Mediterranean southwestern Australia. Tree Physiology 20: 1157-1166.
42. Whitehead, D., Jarvis, P.G. & Waring, R.H. 1984. Stomatal conductance, transpiration, and resistance to water uptake in a Pinus sylvestris spacing experiment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14: 692-700.
43. 2 fixation in C3 plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 39: 533-594.