Software engineering: A quality management perspective

TQM Magazine

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 315-327

  McManus, John ^a   Wood Harper, Trevor ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ISO 9000 series; Quality; Standards

Indexed keywords

PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE PACKAGES; STANDARDS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PROJECTS; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 34250842822     PISSN: 0954478X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09544780710756223     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barker, J. (1992), Future Edge: Discovering the Paradigms of Success, William Morrow and Company Inc., New York, NY.
2. Bevan, N. (1997), Quality and Usability: A New Framework, Tutein-Nolthenius, Delft.
3. Brodman, J. and Johnson, D. (1996), "Return on investment from software process improvement as measured by US industry", Cross-Talk, April, pp. 23-9.
4. Budlong, F. and Peterson, J. (1996), "Software metrics, capability evaluation methodology and implementation", Cross-Talk, January, pp. 15-19.
5. Crosby, P.B. (1979), Quality Is Free, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, NY.
6. Fenton, N. (1991), Software Metrics: A Rigorous Approach, Chapman & Hall Publishing, London.
7. Flood, R.L. (1993), Beyond TQM, John Wiley & Sons, London.
8. Gentleman, W. (1996), "The quality of numerical software: assessment and enhancement", in Boisvert, R. (Ed.), The Proceedings of IFIP WG2.5 Working Conference 7, Oxford, 7-12 July, pp. 32-43.
9. Gillies, A. (1996), Case Studies in Software Engineering, SUBSL.
10. ISO 9000-9003 (1997), Guidelines for the Application of ISO 9001:1994 to the Development, Supply, Installation and Maintenance of Computer Software, 2nd ed., 15 December.
11. Juran, J. (1988), The Quality Control Handbook, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
12. Khoshgoftaar, T.M. and Seliya, N. (2002), "Tree-based software quality estimation models for fault prediction", Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS 2002), Ottawa, June 4-7, pp. 203-15.
13. Kontonya, G. and Sommerville, I. (1998), Requirements Engineering, Process and Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
14. McManus, J. (1999a), "Climbing the maturity ladder part I", Project Manager Today, March, pp. 30-1.
15. McManus, J. (1999b), "Climbing the maturity ladder part II", Project Manager Today, April, pp. 4-5.
16. McManus, J. (2000), "Quality meets process improvement", Management Services Journal, No. 5, pp. 14-16.
17. McManus, J. (2004), Risk Management in Software Development Projects, Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
18. Paulk, M. (1993), Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
19. Rangarajan, K., Swaminathan, N., Hedge, V. and Jacob, J. (2001), "Product quality framework: a vehicle for focusing on product quality goals", Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 77-82.
20. Sanders, J. and Curran, E. (1994), Software Quality: A Framework for Success in Software Development and Support, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
21. Shelley, C.C. (1994), "Practical experience of implementing software measurement programmes in industry", Software Quality Management, pp. 95-106.
22. TickIT (1992), A Guide to Software Quality Management System Construction and Certification using EN29001 (ISO 9001), Issue 2.0, 28 February, UK Department of Trade and Industry, London.
23. Watts, R. (1987), Measuring Software Quality, NCC, Blackwell, Oxford.