Numerical simulations of projectile base flow

Collection of Technical Papers - 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting

Volumn 18, Issue , 2006, Pages 13542-13555

  Simon, Franck ^a   Deck, Sébastien ^a   Guillen, Philippe ^a   Cayzac, Roxan ^b  

^a ONERA   (France)

^b Nexter Munitions   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SHEAR LAYER; STATISTICAL TURBULENCE MODELS;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS; TURBULENCE;

REYNOLDS NUMBER;

EID: 34250842609     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. J. Délery and M. Siriex. Ecoulements de Culot. Cycle de Conférences AGARD LS-98 sur l'Aérodynamique des Missiles, 5-16 mars, 1979.
2. P. Sagaut, S. Deck, and M. Terracol. Multiscale and Multiresolution Approaches in Turbulence. To be published by Imperial College Press.
3. P. K. Tucker and W. Shyy. A Numerical Analysis of Supersonic Flow over an Axisymmetric Afterbody. AIAA Paper 93-8347, June, 1993.
4. J. L. Papp and K. N. Ghia. Application of the RNG Turbulence Model to the Simulation of Axisymmetric Supersonic Separated Base Flow. AIAA Paper 2001-0727, Jan., 2001.
5. S. H. Park, S. Acharya, and J. H. Kwon. An Improved Formulation of k - ε Turbulence Models for Supersonic Base Flow. AIAA Paper 2005-4707, June, 2005.
6. J. R. Forsythe, K. A. Hoffmann, R. M. Cummings, and K. D. Squires. Detached-Eddy Simulation with Compressibility Corrections Applied to a Supersonic Axisymmetric Base Flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 124, pp. 911-923, 2002.
7. S. Kawai and K. Fujii. Computational Study of Supersonic Base Flow Using Hybrid Turbulence Methodology. AIAA Journal, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1265-1275, 2005.
8. M. Péchier, P. Guillen, and R. Cayzac. Magnus Effect Over Finned Projectiles. Journal of Spacecraft and Rocket, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 542-549, 2001.
9. S. Deck, P. Duveau, P. d'Espiney, and P. Guillen. Development and Application of Spalart Allmaras One Equation Turbulence Model to Three-Dimensional Supersonic Complex Configurations. Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 171-183, 2002.
10. R. Thépot. PEA Magnus - Etude numérique de l'effet Magnus sur un projectile en rotation (Modélisation Baldwin-Lomax) -Comparaison aux résultats d'essais en soufflerie. ONERA, RT/261/05349 DAAP, Mars, 2003.
11. R. Thépot. Paulo d'Espiney, and J.-P. Pillon. PEA Magnus - Etude numérique de l'effet Magnus sur un projectile en rotation. Travaux complémentaires (Modélisation Spalart-Allmaras) - Conditions de vol. ONERA, RT/262/05349 DAAP, Avril, 2003.
12. P.R. Spalart and S.R. Allmaras. A One Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows. AIAA Paper 92-0439, 1992.
13. P.R. Spalart and S.R. Allmaras. A One Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows. La Recherche Aérospatiale, pp 5-21, 1994.
14. M. Shur, M. Strelets, L. Zaikov, A. Gulyaev, V. Kozlov, and A. Secundov. Comparative Numerical Testimg of One- and Two-Equation Turbulence Models for Flows with Separation and Reattachement. AIAA 95-0863, 33rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 9-12 January, Reno, Nevada, 1995.
15. t-92 Turbulence Model for Shear-Free and Stagnation Point Flows. Journal of Fluids Engineering Vol. 123, pp. 11-15, March, 2001.
16. R. Paciorri, F. Nasuti, and F. Sabetta. Evaluation of Turbulence Modeling in Supersonic Afterbody Computations. AIAA 2001-3039, 31st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, 11-14 June, Anaheim, CA, 2001.
17. R. Paciorri and F. Sabetta. Compressibility Correction for the Spalart-Allmaras Model in Free-Shear Flows. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 326-331, 2003.
18. D. Papamoschou and A. Roshko. The Compressible Turbulent Shear Layer : an Experimental Study. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 197, pp. 453-477, 1988.
19. J. Dacles-Mariani, G. G. Zilliac, J. S. Chow, and P. Bradshaw. Numerical/Experimental Study of a Wingtip Vortex in the Near Field. AIAA Journal, Vol. 33, No. 9, 1995.
20. S. Deck. Simulations Numériques de type URANS-DES des instabilités aérodynamiques de profil en régime transsonique. RTS 201/07381 DAAP - Octobre, 2003.
21. J. L. Herrin and J. C. Dutton. Supersonic Base Flow Experiments in the Near Wake of a Cylindrical Afterbody. AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 77-83, 1994.
22. C. J. Bourdon and J. C. Dutton. Planar Visualizations of Large-scale Turbulent Structures in Axisymmetric Supersonic Separated Flows. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 11, No.1, pp. 201-213, 1999.
23. J. L. Herrin and J. C. Dutton. Effect of a Rapid Expansion on the Development of Compressible Free Shear Layers. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 159-171, 1995.
24. J. L. Herrin and J. C. Dutton. The Turbulence Structure of a Reattaching Axisymmetric Compressible Free Shear Layer. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 9, No.11, pp. 3502-3512, 1997.
25. C. J. Bourdon and J. C. Dutton. Shear Layer Flapping and Interface Convolution in a Separated Supersonic Flow. AIAA Journal. Vol. 38, No. 10, pp. 1907-1915, 2000.
26. J. R. Janssen and J. C. Dutton. Time-Series Analysis of Supersonic Base-Pressure Fluctuations. AIAA Journal, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp.605-613, 2004.
27. N. L. Messersmith and J. C. Dutton. Characteristic Features of Large Structures in Compressible Mixing Layers. AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No. 9, pp. 1814-1821, 1996.
28. K. M. Smith and J. C. Dutton. Investigation of Large-Scale Structures in Supersonic Planar Base Flows. AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1146-1152, 1996.
29. K. M. Smith and J. C. Dutton. Evolution and Convection of Large-Scale Structures in Supersonic Reattaching Shear Flows. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 11, No.8, pp. 2127-2138, 1999.
30. J. C. Dutton, J. L. Herrin, M. J. Molezzi, T. Mathur, and K. M. Smith. Recent Progress on High-Speed Separated Base Flows. AIAA 95-0472, 33rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 9-12 January, Reno, Nevada, 1995.
31. C. J. Bourdon and J. C. Dutton. Effects of Boattailling on the Turbulence Structure of a Compressible Base Flow. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 38, No. 4, July-August, pp. 534-541, 2001.
32. R. A. Baurle, C.-J. Tam, J. R. Edwards, and H. A. Hassan. Hybrid Simulation Approach for Cavity Flows : Blending, Algorithm and Boundary Treatment Issues. AIAA Journal, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 1463-1480, 2003.
33. F. Simon, S. Deck, P. Guillen, and P. Sagaut. RANS/LES Simulations of Supersonic Base Flow. AIAA 2006-0898, Jan., 2006.
34. R. P. Reklis and W. B. Sturek. Surface pressure measurements on slender bodies at angle of attack in supersonic flow. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, ARBRL-MR-02876, November, 1978.
35. C. J. Nietubicz and K. O. Opalka. Supersonic wind tunnel measurements of static and Magnus aerodynamic coefficients for projectile shapes with tangent and secant ogive noses. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, ARBRL-MR-02991, February, 1980.
36. L. D. Kayser and W. B. Sturek. Experimental measurements in the turbulent, boundary layer of a yawed, spinning ogive-cylinder body of revolution at Mach 3.0. Part II. Data tabulation. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, ARBRL-MR-02813, March, 1978.
37. L. D. Kayser and W. B. Sturek. Turbulent boundary layer measurements on the boattail section of a yawed, spinning projectile shape at Mach 3.0. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, ARBRL-MR-02880, November, 1978.
38. A. C. Perrilat. Obus gyrostabilisé - Mesure en soufflerie de coefficients aérodynamiques. Laboratoire de Recherches Balistiques et Aérodynamiques, No. 1004/98/MDE/E53/RE1/NC, 1998.
39. M. Péchier. Prévisions Numériques de l'Effet Magnus pour des Configurations de Munitions. PhD, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France, 1999.
40. J. Cousteix. Turbulence et Couche Limite. Cepadues-Editions, 1989.
41. I. D. Jacobson. Magnus Characteristics of Arbitrary Rotating Bodies. AGARD, AG-171.
42. S. Kangovi. Base Flow of a Spinning Axisymmetric Body.
43. B. A. Boswell and J. C. Dutton. Flow Visualisations and Measurements of a Three-Dimensional Supersonic Separated Flow. AIAA Journal, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2001.
44. B. A. Boswell and J. C. Dutton. Velocity Measurements in a Three-Dimensional Compressible Base Flow. AIAA Journal, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2003.
45. B. A. Boswell and J. C. Dutton. Shear layer development in a three-dimensional compressible base flow. Physics of Fluids, Vol.16, No. 8, pp 3031-3044, 2004.
46. A. L. Kastengren, J. C. Dutton, and G. S. Elliot. Coherent Structure Eduction and COnvection in Supersonic Wake Shear Layers. AIAA Paper 2005-4639, June, 2005.
47. L. B. Schiff and W. B. Sturek. Numerical Simulation of Steady Supersonic Flow Over an Ogive-Cylinder-Boattail Body. AIAA Paper 80-0066, Jan., 1980.
48. W. B. Sturek, D. C. Mylin, and C. C. Bush. Computational parametric study of the aerodynamics of spinning bodies at supersonic speeds. AIAA Paper 80-1585, August, 1980.
49. W. B. Sturek and L. B. Schiff. Computations of the Magnus effect for slender bodies in supersonic flow. AIAA Paper 80-1586, August, 1980.
50. W. B. Sturek and D. C. Mylin. Computational parametric study of the Magnus effect on boattailed shell at supersonic speeds. AIAA Paper 81-1900, August, 1981.
51. P. Weinacht, B. J. Guidos, L. D. Kayser, and W. B. Sturek. PNS computations for spinning and fin-stabilized projectiles at supersonic velocities. AIAA Paper 84-2118, August, 1984.
52. B. S. Baldwin and H. Lomax. Thin layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows. AIAA Paper 78-257, Jan., 1978.
53. R. Cayzac, E. Carette, P. Champigny, R. Thépot, and O. Donneaud. Analysis of Static and Dynamic Stability of Spinning Projectiles. 21st International Symposium on Ballistics, Adelaide, South Australia, 19-23 April, 2004.
54. J. DeSpirito and K. R. Heavey. CFD Computation of Magnus Moment and Roll Damping Moment of a Spinning Projectile. AIAA Paper 2004-4713, August, 2004.