How well do herbarium data predict the location of present populations? A test using Echinacea species in Missouri

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1397-1407

  Applequist, Wendy L ^a   McGlinn, Daniel J ^b   Miller, Michele ^c,d   Long, Quinn G ^c,e   Miller, James S ^a  

^a MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^d Kansas Migrant Education Program   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation; Echinacea; Herbarium specimens; Historical populations; Missouri

Indexed keywords

DATABASE; HABITAT LOSS; HERB; HERBARIUM; HISTORICAL ECOLOGY; HUMAN ACTIVITY; POPULATION DECLINE; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RELOCATION;

MISSOURI; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ECHINACEA PALLIDA; ECHINACEA PURPUREA;

EID: 34250840189     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-006-6737-x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Antonovics J., Hood M.E., Thrall P.H., Abrams J.Y. and Duthie G.M. (2003). Herbarium studies on the distribution of anther-smut fungus (Microbotryum violaceum) and Silene species (Caryophyllaceae) in the eastern United States. Am. J. Bot. 90: 1522-1531
2. Binns S.E., Baum B.R. and Arnason J.T. (2002). A taxonomic revision of Echinacea (Asteraceae). Syst. Bot. 27: 610-632
3. Burgman M.A., Grimson R.C. and Ferson S. (1995). Inferring threat from scientific collections. Conserv. Biol. 9: 923-928
4. Delisle F., Lavoie C., Jean M. and Lachance D. (2003). Reconstructing the spread of invasive plants: taking into account biases associated with herbarium specimens. J. Biogeogr. 30: 1033-1042
5. Freckleton R.P. and Watkinson A.R. (2002). Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. J. Ecol. 90: 419-434
6. Funk V.A., Zermoglio M.F. and Nasir N. (1999). Testing the use of specimen collection data and GIS in biodiversity exploration and conservation decision making in Guyana. Biodivers. Conserv. 8: 727-751
7. Golding J.S. (2001). Southern African herbaria and Red Data Lists. Taxon 50: 593-602
8. Hedenas L., Bisang I., Tehler A., Hamnede M., Jaederfelt K. and Odelvik G. (2002). A herbarium-based method for estimates of temporal frequency changes: mosses in Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 105: 321-331
9. Heyligers P.C. (1998). Some New South Wales coastal plant distributions: a comparison of herbarium records with transect survey data. Cunninghamia 5: 645-664
10. Kimmel V.I. and Probasco G.E. (1980). Change in woody cover on limestone glades between 1938 and 1975. Trans. Mo. Acad. Sci. 14: 69-74
11. Koponen H.S., Hellqvist H., Lindqvist-Kreuze H., Bang U. and Valkonen J.P.T. (2000). Occurrence of Peronospora sparsa (P. rubi) on cultivated and wild Rubus species in Finland and Sweden. Ann. Appl. Biol. 137: 107-112
12. Kropf M. and Bernhardt K.-G. 2004. The historical distribution of Anthyllis montana subsp. jacquinii (Fabaceae) in Austria: insights from herbarium material. Planta Europaea4th European Conference on the Conservation of Wild Plants, 17-20.09.2004, ValenciaSpain.Available on the World Wide Web at http://www.nerium.net/plantaeuropaea/Download/Procedings/Kropf_Bernhart.pdf [sic; accessed 2 May 2005].
13. MacDougall A.S., Loo J.A., Clayden S.R., Goltz J.G. and Hinds H.R. (1998). Defining conservation priorities for plant taxa in southeastern New Brunswick, Canada using herbarium records. Biol. Conserv. 86: 325-338
14. McGregor R.L. (1968). The taxonomy of the genus Echinacea (Compositae). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 68: 113-142
15. Nilsson S.G. and Nilsson I.N. (1983). Are estimated species turnover rates on islands largely sampling errors?. Am. Nat. 121: 595-597
16. Parkhurst D.F. (1978). The adaptive significance of stomatal occurrence on one or both surfaces of leaves. J. Ecol. 66: 367-383
17. Primack D., Imbres C., Primack R.B., Miller-Rushing A.J. and Del Tredici P. (2004). Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston. Am. J. Bot. 91: 1260-1264
18. Pyšek P. (1991). Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 26: 439-454
19. Quinn G. and Keough M. (2002). Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK
20. (2004). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaAustria
21. Rich T.C.G. and Woodruff E.R. (1992). Recording bias in botanical surveys. Watsonia 19: 73-95
22. Ristaino J.B. (1988). The importance of archival and herbarium materials in understanding the role of oospores in late blight epidemics of the past. Phytopathology 88: 1120-1130
23. Saltonstall K. (2002). Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reedPhragmites australisinto North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 2445-2449
24. Schatz G.E. (2002). Taxonomy and herbaria in service of plant conservation: lessons from Madagascar's endemic families. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 89: 145-152
25. Stuckey R.L. (1980). Distributional history of Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in North America. Bartonia 47: 3-20
26. ter Steege H., Jansen-Jacobs M.J. and Datadin V.K. (2000). Can botanical collections assist in a National Protected Area Strategy in Guyana?. Biodivers. Conserv. 9: 215-240
27. Ungricht S., Rasplus J.-Y. and Kjellberg F. (2005). Extinction threat evaluation of endemic fig trees of New Caledonia: priority assessment for taxonomy and conservation with herbarium collections. Biodivers. Conserv. 14: 205-232
28. Weber E. (1998). The dynamics of plant invasions: a case study of three exotic goldenrod species (Solidago L.) in Europe. J. Biogeogr. 25: 147-154
29. Willis F., Moat J. and Paton A. (2003). Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa. Biodivers. Conserv. 12: 1537-1552