Dye-assisted lymph vessels sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 360-363

  Golebiewski, Andrzej ^a   Krolak, Marek ^a   Komasara, Leszek ^a   Czauderna, Piotr ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISULFINE BLUE; DYE;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; GONAD; HUMAN; HYDROCELE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPH VESSEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; STAINING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TESTIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUNICA VAGINALIS; VARICOCELE; VARICOCELECTOMY;

ADOLESCENT; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CHILD; COLORING AGENTS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPHATIC VESSELS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROSANILINE DYES; TESTICULAR HYDROCELE; TESTIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; VARICOCELE;

EID: 34250835617     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.0072     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Skog S, Roberts KT, Goldstein M, Pryor JL. Adolescent varicocele: What's new with an old problem in young patients? Pediatrics 1997;100:112-122.
2. Akbay E, Cayan S, Doruk E, Duce MN, Bozlu M. The prevalence of varicocele and varicocele-related testicular atrophy in Turkish children and adolescents. BJU Int 2000;86:490-493.
3. Oster J. Varicocele in children and adolescents: An investigation of the incidence among Danish school children. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1971;5:27-32.
4. Kass EJ, Freitas JE, Bour JB. Adolescent varicocele: Objective indications for treatment. J Urol 1989;142:579-582.
5. Hadziselimovic F, Herzog B, Liebundgut B, Jenny P, Buser M. Testicular and vascular changes in children and adults with varicocele. J Urol 1989;142:583-558.
6. Riccabona M, Oswald J, Koen M, Lusuardi L, Radmayr C, Bartsch G. Optimizing the operative treatment of boys with varicocele: Sequential comparison of 4 techniques. J Urol 2003;169:666-668.
7. Humphrey GME, Najmaldin AS. Laparoscopy in the management of pediatric varicoceles. J Ped Surg 1997;32:1470-1472.
8. Peters CA. Laparoscopy in pediatric urology: Challenge and opportunity. Sem Ped Surg 1996;5:16-22.
9. Chan P, Goldstein M. Varicocele: Options for management. AUA News 2001;6:1-6.
10. Szabo R, Kessler R. Hydrocele following internal spermatic vein ligation: Retrospective study and review of the literature. J Urol 1984;132:924-925.
11. Misseri R, Gershbein AB, Horowitz M, Glassberg KI. The adolescent varicocele. II: The incidence of hydrocele and delayed recurrent varicocele after varicocelectomy in a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2001;87:494-498.
12. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocelectomy as therapy in male infertility: A study of 504 cases. J Urol 1975;113:640-641.
13. Aaberg RA, Vancaillie TG, Schuessler WW. Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: A new technique. Fertil Steril 1991;56:776-777.
14. Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: An artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol 1992;148:1808-1811.
15. Kocvara R, Dvoracek J, Sedlacek J, Dite Z, Novak K. Lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy: A microsurgical repair. J Urol 2005;173:1751-1754.
16. Oswald J, Korner I, Riccabona M. The use of isosulphan blue to identify lymphatic vessels in the high retroperitoneal ligation of adolescent varicocele - avoiding postoperative hydrocele. BJU Int 2001;87:502-504.
17. Tan HL, Tecson B, Ee MZ, Tantoco J. Lymphatic sparing, laparoscopic varicocelectomy: A new surgical technique. Pediatr Surg Int 2004;20:797-798.
18. Barot P, Neff M, Cantor B, Baig A, Geis PW, Fleisher M. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy with lymphatic preservation using methylene blue dye. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2004;14:183-185.
19. Stradling B, Aranha G, Gabram S. Adverse skin lesions after methylene blue injections for sentinel lymph node lacalization. Am J Surg 2002;184:350-352.
20. Salhab M, Al Sarakbi W, Mokbel K. Skin and fat necrosis of the breast following methylene blue dye injection for sentinel node biopsy in a patient with breast cancer. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2005;2:26. Accessed online at http://www.issoonline.com/content/2/1/26.
21. Berk DR, Johnson DL, Uzieblo A, Kiernan M, Swetter SM. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma: The Stanford experience, 1997-2004. Arch Dermatol 2005;141:1016-1022.
22. Gipponi M, Bassetti C, Canavese G, Catturich A, Di Somma C, Vecchio C, Nicolo G, Schenone F, Tomei D, Cafiero F. Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 2004;85(3):102-111.
23. Govaert GA, Oostenbroek RJ, Plaisier PW. Prolonged skin staining after intradermal use of patent blue in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:373-375.
24. Mullan MH, Deacoc SJ, Quiney NF, Kissin MW. Anaphylaxis to patent blue dye during sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001;27:218-219.