Gender-Biased data in survey research regarding wildlife

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 373-377

  Jacobson, Cynthia A ^a   Brown, Tommy L ^b   Scheufele, Dietram A ^c  

^a ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENDER DISPARITY; SURVEY; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34250827229     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920601161387     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Asher, H. (2001) Polling and the public: What every American should know,, CQ Press, Washington, DC
2. Belinfante, A. (2002) Telephone subscribership in the United States, Federal Communications Division, Washington, DC
3. Brehm, J. (1993) The phantom respondents, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
4. Brown, T. L. and Decker, D. J. (2003) Alaska residents' attitudes toward predator management statewide and in Unit 13, Ithaca, NY
5. Chavez, A. S., Gese, E. M. and Krannich, R. S. (2005) Attitudes of rural landowners toward wolves in northwestern Minnesota. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 33:2, pp. 517-527.
6. Connelly, N. A., Brown, T. L. and Decker, D. J. (2003) Factors affecting response rates to natural resources-focused mail surveys: Empirical evidence of declining rates over time. Society Nat. Resources, 16, pp. 541-549.
7. Dillman, D. A. (1978) Main and telephone surveys: The total design method, Wiley-Interscience, New York
8. Dillman, D. A. (2000) Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, John Wiley and Sons, New York
9. Dougherty, E. M., Fulton, D. C. and Anderson, D. H. (2003) The influence of gender on the relationship between wildlife value orientations, beliefs, and the acceptability of lethal deer control in Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Society Nat. Resources, 16, pp. 603-623.
10. Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B. and Couper, M. P. (1992) Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opin. Q., 56:4, pp. 475-495.
11. Kent, R. (2001) Data construction and data analysis for survey research, Palgrave, New York
12. Krueger, R. A. and Casey, M. A. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research,, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
13. Lauber, T. B. and Knuth, B. A. (1998) Suburban residents' attitudes towards contraception and other deer management techniques, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
14. O'Rourke, D. and Lakner, E. (1989) Gender bias: Analysis of factors causing male underrepresentation in surveys. Int. J. Public Opin. Res., 2, pp. 164-176.
15. Riffe, D., Lacy, S. and Fico, F. G. (1998) Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
16. (2001) Age 2000: Census 2000 brief, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC
17. Whitehead, J. C. (1991) Environmental interest group behavior and self-selection bias in contingent value mail surveys. Growth Change, 22:1, pp. 10-21.