Aftershock detection thresholds as a function of time: Results from the ANZA seismic network following the 31 October 2001 ML 5.1 Anza, California, earthquake

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 780-792

  Kilb, Debi ^a   Martynov, Vladislav G ^a   Vernon, Frank L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA RECORDING; EARTHQUAKES; SEISMOGRAPHS; TECTONICS;

AFTERSHOCK DETECTION; FAULT SYSTEM; SEISMIC NETWORK;

SEISMIC PROSPECTING;

AFTERSHOCK; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CODA; EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; FAULT ZONE; SEISMICITY; SEISMOGRAM;

ANZA; CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SAN JACINTO FAULT ZONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34250811963     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120060116     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aki, K., and P. G. Richards (1980). Quantitative Seismology, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California.
2. Anderson, J. G., J. N. Brune, J. N. Louie, Y. H. Zeng, M. Savage, G. Yu, Q. B. Chen, and D. Depolo (1994). Seismicity in the western great-basin apparently triggered by the Landers, California, earthquake, 28 June 1992, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 863-891.
3. Bath, M. (1965). Lateral inhomogeneities, Tectonophysics 2, 483-514.
4. Berger, J., L. M. Baker, J. N. Brune, J. B. Fletcher, T. C. Hands, and F. L. Vernon, III (1984). The Anza array: a high-dynamic-range, broadband, digitally radiotelemetered, seismic array, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, 1469-1481.
5. Ben-Zion, Y., and V. Lyakhovsky (2006). Analysis of aftershocks in a lithospheric model with seismogenic zone governed by damage rheology, Geophs. J. Int. 165, 197-210, doi 10.1111/ j.1365-246X.2006.02878.x.
6. Brodsky, E. E., and S. G. Prejean (2005). New constraints on mechanisms of remotely triggered seismicity at Long Valley Caldera, J. Geophys. Res. 110, B04302, doi 10.1029/2004JB003211.
7. Deichmann, N. (2006). Local magnitude, a moment revisited, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, 1267-1277.
8. Dieterich, J. (1994). A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 2601-2618.
9. 1 approx 5 earthquakes near Anza, California, and a comparison with an Imperial Valley aftershock, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74, 1509-1527.
10. Gomberg, J., and P. Johnson (2005). Dynamic triggering of earthquakes, Nature 437, 830, doi 10.1038/nature04167.
11. Gomberg, J., P. A. Reasenberg, P. Bodin, and R. A. Harris (2001). Earthquake triggering by seismic waves following the Landers and Hector Mine earthquakes, Nature 411, 462-466.
12. Guo, Z., and Y. Ogata (1995). Correlations between characteristic parameters of aftershock distributions in time, space and magnitude, Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 993-996.
13. Helmstetter, A., and D. Sornette (2003). Bath's law derived from the Gutenberg-Richter law and from aftershock properties, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2069, doi 10.1029/2003GL018186.
14. Kagan, Y. Y. (2004). Short-term properties of earthquake catalogs and models of earthquake source, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 1207-1228.
15. Kilb, D. (2003). A strong correlation between induced peak dynamic Coulomb stress change from the 1992 M 7.3 Landers, California, earthquake and the hypocenter of the 1999 M 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 108, doi 10.1029/200IJB000678.
16. Mandal, P., R. Narsaiah, B. Sairam, C. Satyamurty, and I. P. Raju (2006). Relocation of early and late aftershocks of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake using joint hypocentral determination (JHD) technique: implication toward the continued aftershock activity for more than four years, Pure Appl. Geophys. 163, 1561-1581.
17. Ojala, I. O., I. G. Main, and B. T. Ngwenya (2004). Strain rate and temperature dependence of Omori law scaling constants of AE data: implications for earthquake foreshock-aftershock sequences, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L24617, doi 10.1029/2004GL020781.
18. Peng, Z., J. E. Vidale, and H. Houston (2006). Anomalous early aftershock decay rate of the 2004 Mw 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, no. 17, L17307, doi 10.1029/2006GL026744.
19. Peng, Z., J. E. Vidale, M. Ishii, and A. Helmstetter (2007). Seismicity rate immediately before and after main shock rupture from high-frequency waveforms in Japan, J. Geophys. Res. 112, B03306, doi 10.1029/2006JB004386.
20. Prejean, S. G., D. P. Hill, E. E. Brodsky, S. E. Hough, M.J.S. Johnston, S. D. Malone, D. H. Oppenheimer, A. M. Pitt, and K. B. Richards-Dinger (2004). Remotely triggered seismicity on the United States West Coast following the Mw 7.9 Denali fault earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, S348-S359.
21. Reasenberg, P. A., and L. M. Jones (1994). Earthquake aftershocks: update, Science 265, 1251-1252.
22. Richardson, E., and C. Marone (1999). Effects of normal stress vibrations on frictional healing, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 28,859-28,878, doi 10. 1029/1999JB900320.
23. Richter, C. F. (1958) Elementary Seismology, W. H. Freeman San Francisco, California.
24. Shcherbakov, R., D. L. Turcotte, and J. B. Rundle (2004). A generalized Omori's law for earthquake aftershock decay, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L11613, doi 10.1029/2004GL019808.
25. Shcherbakov, R., D. L. Turcotte, and J. B. Rundle (2005). Aftershock statistics, Pure Appl. Geophys. 162, 1051-1076.
26. Shcherbakov, R., D. L. Turcotte, and J. B. Rundle (2006). Scaling properties of the Parkfield aftershock sequence, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96, S376-S384.
27. Thomson, D. J. (1982). Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis, Proc. IEEE 70, 1055-1096.
28. Utsu, T., Y. Ogata, and R. S. Matsuâura (1995). The centenary of the Omori formula for a decay law of aftershock activity, J. Phys. Earth 43, 1-33.
29. Vernon, F. L., III (1989). Analysis of data recorded on the ANZA seismic network, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California San Diego.
30. Vidale, J. E., E. S. Cochran, H. Kanamori, and R. W. Clayton (2003). After the lightning and before the thunder; non-Omori behavior of early aftershocks? (abstract), EOS Trans. AGU 84, no. 46 (Fall Meet. Suppl.), S31A-08.
31. Voisin, C. (2001). Dynamic triggering of earthquakes: The linear slip-dependent friction case, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, no. 17, 3357-3360, doi 10.1029/2001GL013101.
32. Walker, K., D. Kilb, and G. Lin (2005). The 2001 and 2005 Anza earthquakes: aftershock focal mechanisms (abstract), Southern California Earthquake Center, Los Angeles, California.
33. Wessel, P., and W.H.F. Smith (1998). New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released, EOS Trans. AGU 79, 579.