The rewards and challenges of pursuing research in a correctional agency

Journal of Criminal Justice Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 110-124

  Camp, Scott D ^a  

^a University s College of Criminal Justice   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250810102     PISSN: 10511253     EISSN: 17459117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1051125042000333505     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bonta, J, and Motiuk, LL. 1992. “Inmate Classification.”. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20: 343
2. Camp, SD. 1999. “Do Inmate Survey Data Reflect Prison Conditions? Using Surveys to Assess Prison Conditions of Confinement.”. The Prison Journal, 79: 250–68.
3. Camp, SD, and Gaes, GG. 2002. “Growth and Quality of U.S. Private Prisons: Evidence from a National Survey.”. Criminology and Public Policy, 1: 427–49.
4. Camp, SD, Gaes, GG, Klein‐Saffran, J, Daggett, DM, and Saylor, WG. 2002a. “Using Inmate Survey Data in Assessing Prison Performance: A Case Study Comparing Private and Public Prisons.”. Criminal Justice Review, 27: 26–51.
5. Camp, SD, Gaes, GG, Langan, NP, and Saylor, WG. 2003. “The Influence of Prisons on Inmate Misconduct: A Multilevel Investigation.”. Justice Quarterly, 20: 501–33.
6. Camp, SD, Gaes, GG, and Saylor, WG. 2002b. “Quality of Prison Operations in the Federal Sector: A Comparison with a Private Prison.”. Punishment and Society, 4: 27–53.
7. Camp, SD, Saylor, WG, and Harer, MD. 1997. “Aggregating Individual‐Level Evaluations of the Organizational Social Climate: A Multilevel Investigation of the Work Environment at the Federal Bureau of Prisons.”. Justice Quarterly, 14: 739–61.
8. Camp, SD, Saylor, WG, and Wright, KN. 1999. “Creating Performance Measures from Survey Data: A Practical Discussion.”. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3: 71–80.
9. Deaver J, 2001 The Blue Nowhere New York Simon & Schuster
10. Harer, MD, and Langan, NP. 2001. “Gender Differences in Predictors of Prison Violence: Assessing the Predictive Validity of a Risk Classification System.”. Crime and Delinquency, 47: 513–36.
11. Innes CA, 2000 Technical Report for Preliminary Results from the Evaluation of the Beckley Responsibility and Values Enhancement (BRAVE) Program Washington DC Federal Bureau of Prisons
12. Innes CA, 2001 Results from the Evaluation of the First Two Years of the BRAVE Program at FCI Beckley Washington DC Federal Bureau of Prisons
13. Katzer J, Cook KH, Crouch WW, 1998 Evaluating Information: A Guide for Users of Social Science Research 4th Ed. Boston McGraw‐Hill
14. Motiuk, LL, and Blanchette, K. 2001. “Characteristics of Administratively Segregated Offenders in Federal Corrections.”. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43: 131–44.
15. Motiuk, LL, and Proporino, FJ. 1995. “The Prison Careers of Mentally Disordered Offenders.”. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18: 29
16. Pelissier, B, Wallace, S, O’Neil, JA, Gaes, GG, Camp, SD, and Rhodes, W. 2001. “Federal Residential Drug Treatment Reduces Substance Use and Arrests after Release.”. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27: 315–37.
17. Rossi PH, Freeman HE, 1993 Evaluation: A Systematic Approach 5th Ed. Newbury Park CA Sage
18. Saylor, WG, and Gaes, GG. 1997. “Training Inmates through Industrial Work Participation and Vocational and Apprenticeship Instruction.”. Corrections Management Quarterly, 1: 32–43.
19. Saylor, WG, and Gaes, GG. 2001. “The Differential Effect of Industries and Vocational Training on Postrelease Outcomes for Ethnic and Racial Groups: Research Note.”. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5: 17–24.
20. Scriven MS, 1980 The Logic of Evaluation Inverness CA Edgepress