Experimental control and threats to internal validity of concurrent and nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 451-459

  Christ, Theodore J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b School Psychology Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250809610     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20237     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97.
2. Barlow, D.H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
3. Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Carr, J.E. (2005). Recommendations for reporting multiple-baseline designs across participants. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 219-224.
5. Cuvo, A.J. (1979). Multiple-baseline design in instructional research: Pitfalls of measurement and procedural advantages. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 219-228.
6. Harris, F.N., & Jenson, W.R. (1985). Comparisons of multiple-baseline across persons designs and AB designs with replication: Issues and confusions. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 121-127.
7. Hayes, L.A. (1976). The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83,628-648.
8. Hayes, S.C. (1981). Single case experimental design and empirical clinical practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 193-211.
9. Johnston, J.M., & Pennypacker, H.S. (1993). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Kazdin, A.E. (1981). Drawing valid inferences from case studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 183-192.
11. Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case esearch designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Kazdin, A.E., & Kopel, S.A. (1975). On resolving ambiguities of the multiple-baseline design: Problems and recommendations. Behavior Therapy, 6, 601-608.
13. Murphy, R.J., & Bryan, A.J. (1980). Multiple-baseline and multiple-probe designs: Practical alternatives for special education assessment and evaluation. Journal of Special Education, 14, 325-335.
14. Tawney, J.W., & Gast, D.L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
15. Watson, P.J., & Workman, E.A. (1981). The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 12, 257-259.