Damping correction factors for horizontal ground-motion response spectra

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 934-960

  Cameron, Wanda I ^a   Green, Russell A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAMPING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TECTONICS;

DAMPING CORRECTION FACTORS; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; GROUND MOTION; VELOCITY PULSE;

EARTHQUAKES;

DAMPING; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; GROUND MOTION; TECTONIC SETTING;

EID: 34250803837     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120060034     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ambraseys, N. N., J. Douglas, S. K. Sarma, and P. M. Smit (2005). Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration, Bull. Earthquake Eng. 3, 1-53.
2. Ambraseys, N. N., K. A. Simpson, and J. J. Bommer (1996). Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25, 371-400.
3. Atkinson, G. M., and D. Boore (1995). New ground motion relations for eastern North America, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 17-30.
4. Atkinson, G. M., and J. R. Pierre (2004). Ground-motion response spectra in eastern North America for different critical damping values, Seism. Res. Lett. 75, no. 4, 541-545.
5. Bommer, J. J., and R. Mendis (2005). Scaling of spectral displacement ordinates with damping ratios, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 145-165.
6. Bommer, J. J., A. S. Elnashai, and A. G. Weir (2000). Compatible acceleration and displacement spectra for seismic design codes, Presented at Proc. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, paper no. 207.
7. Boore, D. M. (1983). Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, no. 6, 1856-1894.
8. Boore, D. M. (1999). Effects of baseline corrections on response spectra for two recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 99-545.
9. Boore, D. M. (2005). On pads and filters: processing strong-motion data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 95, 745-750.
10. Boore, D. M., and S. Akkar (2003). Effect of causal and acausal filters on elastic and inelastic response spectra, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 1729-1748.
11. Boore, D. M., and J. J. Bommer (2005). Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 25, 93-115.
12. Boore, D. M., C. D. Stephens, and W. B. Joyner (2002). Comments on baseline correction of digital strong-motion data: examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 1543-1560.
13. Chopra, A. K. (2005a). Discussion of paper "An improved capacity spectrum method for ATC-40" by Y.-Y. Lin and K.-C. Chang, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 97.
14. Chopra, A. K. (2005b). Earthquake Dynamics of Structures: A Primer, 2nd ed. EERI Monograph Series, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California.
15. Ebeling, R. M., R. A. Green, and S. E. French (1997). Accuracy of response of single-degree-of-freedom systems to ground motion, Technical Report ITL-97-7, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
16. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (1988). Engineering model of earthquake ground motion for Eastern North America, EPRI NP-6074, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
17. Eurocode 8 (2004). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, EN 1998-1: 2004. Comite Europeen de Normalisation, Brussels.
18. Green, R. A., and G. A. Terri (2005). Number of equivalent cycles concept for liquefaction evaluations - revisited, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131, no. 4, 477-488.
19. Gulkan, P., and M. Sozen (1974). Inelastic response of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake motions, ACI J. 71, 604-610.
20. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (IEEE) (1997). Recommended Practices for Seismic Design of Substations, IEEE Std 693-1997, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York, New York.
21. Lin, Y. Y., and K. C. Chang (2003). Study on damping reduction factor for building under earthquake ground motions, J. Struct. Eng. 129, no. 2, 206-214.
22. Lin, Y. Y., E. Miranda, and K. C. Chang (2005). Evaluation of damping reduction factors for estimating elastic response of structures with high damping, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 1427-1443.
23. McGuire, R. K., W. J. Silva, and C. J. Costantino (2001). Technical Basis for Revision of Regulatory Guidance on Design Ground Motions: Hazard- and Risk-Consistent Ground Motion Spectra Guidelines, NUREG/ CR-6728, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
24. Naeim, F., and C. A. Kircher (2001). On the damping adjustment factors for earthquake response spectra, Struct. Design Tall Buildings 10, 361-369.
25. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) (2003). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA 450, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
26. Newmark, N. M., and W. J. Hall (1982). Earthquake Spectra and Design, EERI Monograph Series. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, California.
27. Nigam, N. C., and P. C. Jennings (1968). Digital Calculation of Response Spectra from Strong-Motion Earthquake Records, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
28. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) (2006). Strong ground motion processing, http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/process.html (last accessed December 2006).
29. Pecknold, D. A., and R. Riddell (1978). Effect of initial base motion on response spectra, J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE 104, no. 2, 485-491.
30. Priestley, M.J.N. (2003). Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering, Revisited, The Mallet Milne Lecture, IUSS Press, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
31. Romero, S. M., and G. J. Rix (2001). Ground motion amplification of soils in the upper Mississippi Embayment, Report no. GIT-CEE/GEO-01-1, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
32. Shibata, A., and M. Sozen (1976). Substitute structure method for seismic design in R/C, J. Struct. Div. 102, no. ST1, 1-18.
33. Silva, W. J., and K. Lee (1987). WES RASCAL code for synthesizing earthquake ground motions, Report 24 State-of-the-Art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States, Miscellaneous Paper S-73-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
34. Somerville, P. G., N. F. Smith, R. W. Graves, and N. A. Abrahamson (1997). Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 199-222.