Long-Acting and Permanent Contraception: An International Development, Service Delivery Perspective

Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 361-367

  Jacobstein, Roy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

contraception; female sterilization; implants; international family planning; IUDs; reproductive health; vasectomy; WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria

Indexed keywords

COPPER; ETONOGESTREL; GESTAGEN; LEVONORGESTREL;

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTRACEPTION; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FEMALE STERILIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SAFETY; STANDARD; VASECTOMY; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MALE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; WORLD HEALTH; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 34250800261     PISSN: 15269523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Web site. State of world population (2005). http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/english/ch1/index.htm Available from: www.unfpa.org/swp/2005/english/ch1/index.htm. [Accessed January 23, 2007].
2. World Health Organization Web site. Maternal mortality in 2000: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, and UNFPA. Available from: www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/maternal_mortality_2000/index.html. [Accessed January 23, 2007].
3. World Health Organization Web site. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 3rd ed. (2004), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva. http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/mec/0 Available from: www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/mec/. [Accessed January 23, 2007].
4. World Health Organization Web site. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. 2nd ed. (2004), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva. http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/spr/index.htm Available from: www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/spr/index.htm. [Accessed January 23, 2007].
5. Shelton J., Angle M., and Jacobstein R. Medical barriers to access to family planning. Lancet 340 (1992) 1334-1335
6. Salem R. New attention to the IUD: Expanding women's contraceptive options to meet their needs (2006), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, The INFO Project, Baltimore Population Reports, Series B, No. 7. February.
7. United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, World Health Organization, and World Bank. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Long-term reversible contraception: Twelve years of experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C. Contraception 56 (1997) 341-352
8. Sivin I. Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 78 (1991) 291-298
9. Furlong L. Ectopic pregnancy when contraception fails: A review. J Reprod Med 47 (2002) 881-885
10. Task Force for Epidemiological Research on Reproductive Health, World Health Organization. Effects of contraceptives on hemoglobin and ferritin. Contraception 58 (1998) 261-273
11. Access, Quality, and Use in Reproductive Health (ACQUIRE) Project Web site. Improving the use of long-term and permanent methods of contraception in Guinea: A performance needs assessment. E&R Study #1. New York: The ACQUIRE Project/EngenderHealth. Available from: www.acquireproject.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ACQUIRE/Publications/ER_Study_1.pdf. [Accessed January 24, 2007].
12. Maximizing Access and Quality Initiative (MAQ) Web site. IUD toolkit. Available from: www.maqweb.org/iudtoolkit/. [Accessed January 27, 2007].
13. Farley T., Rosenberg M., Rowe P., Chen J., and Meirik O. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: An international perspective. Lancet 339 (1992) 785-788
14. Grimes D. Intrauterine device and upper-genital-tract infection. Lancet 356 (2000) 1013-1019
15. Westrom L. Effect of acute pelvic inflammatory disease on infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121 (1975) 707-713
16. Shelton J. Risk of clinical pelvic inflammatory disease attributable to an intrauterine device. Lancet 357 (2001) 443
17. Hubacher D., Lara-Ricalde R., Taylor D.J., Guerra-Infante F., and Guzman-Rodriguez R. Risk of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women. N Engl J Med 345 (2001) 561-567
18. Sinei S., Morrison C., Sekadde-Kigondu C., Allen M., and Kokonya D. Complications of use of intrauterine devices among HIV-1-infected women. Lancet 351 (1998) 1238-1241
19. Morrison C., Sekadde-Kigondu C., Sinei S., Weiner D., Kwok C., and Kokonya D. Is the intrauterine device appropriate contraception for HIV-1-infected women?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 198 (2001) 784-790
20. Richardson B., Morrison C., and Sekadde-Kigondu C. Effect of intrauterine device use on cervical shedding of HIV-1 DNA. AIDS 13 (1999) 2091-2097
21. Kenya Ministry of Health. An extremely low-cost option. IUCD Method Briefs: A New Look at IUDs, No. 3 (2003)
22. Sonnenberg F., Burkman R., Hagerty C., Speroff L., and Speroff T. Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods. Contraception 69 (2004) 447-459
23. Trussell J., Leveque J., Koenig J., London R., Borden S., Henneberry J., et al. The economic value of contraception: A comparison of 15 methods. Am J Public Health 85 (1995) 494-503
24. Morgan K. The intrauterine device: Rethinking old paradigms. J Midwifery Womens Health 51 (2006) 464-470
25. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 70 (2004) 89-96
26. EngenderHealth. Contraceptive sterilization: Global issues and trends (2002), EngenderHealth, New York
27. Peterson H., Xia Z., Hughes J., Wilcox L., Tylor L., and Trussell J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174 (1996) 1161-1168
28. Peterson H., Xia Z., Hughes J., Wilcox L., Tylor L., and Trussell J. The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. US Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. N Engl J Med 336 (1997) 762-767
29. American College of Obstetrician Gynecologists. Benefits and risks of sterilization. ACOG Practice Bulletin #46 (2003), ACOG, Washington, DC
30. Nazerali H., Thapa S., Hays M., Pathak L.R., Pandey K.R., and Sokal D.C. Vasectomy effectiveness in Nepal: A retrospective study. Contraception 67 (2003) 397-401
31. EngenderHealth. No-scalpel vasectomy: An illustrated guide for surgeons (2003), EngenderHealth, New York
32. Jacobstein R, Pile J. Vasectomy: Safe, convenient, effective-and underutilized. Global Health Technical Briefs, 2005, produced for the United States Agency for International Development by The INFO Project, Johns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs. Available from: www.maqweb.org/techbriefs/tb7vasectomy.pdf. [Accessed January 27, 2007].
33. ACQUIRE Project Web site. US Agency for International Development (USAID). A focus on the fundamentals of care: Improving family planning and reproductive health care. Acquiring Knowledge No. 1. Available from: www.acquireproject.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ACQUIRE/Publications/ACQUIRE_Knowledge_FOC_final.pdf. [Accessed January 24, 2007].
34. Rogers E. The diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. (1995), The Free Press, New York