A watershed-simulation and hybrid optimization modeling approach for water-quality trading in soil erosion control

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1902-1913

  Luo, Bin ^a   You, Jinsheng ^b  

^a Manitoba Hydro ^*  (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Optimization; Soil erosion; Trading; Uncertainty; Water quality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EROSION; OPTIMIZATION; SEDIMENTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATERSHEDS;

DECISION VARIABLES; WATER-QUALITY TRADING;

WATER QUALITY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EROSION; OPTIMIZATION; SEDIMENTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

EROSION CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; SOIL EROSION; STREAMWATER; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; SASKATCHEWAN; SWIFT CURRENT;

EID: 34250785178     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Al-Abed N.A., and Whiteley H.R. Calibration of the hydrological simulation program FORTRAN (HSPF) model using automatic calibration and geographical information systems. Hydrol Process 16 (2002) 3169-3188
2. Barling R.D., and Moore I.D. Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution: a review. Environ Manage 18 4 (1994) 543-558
3. Bellman R., and Zadeh L.A. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage Sci 17 4 (1970) 141-164
4. Beven K.J. Rainfall-runoff modeling: the primer (2000), Wiley, Chichester
5. Bicknell B.R., Imhoff J.C., Kittle J.L., Donigian A.S., and Johanson R.C. Hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN (HSPF): user's manual for version 11. EPA/600/R-97/080 (1997), US EPA, Athens (GA)
6. Birge J.R., and Louveaux F.V. A multicut algorithm for two-stage stochastic linear programs. Eur J Oper Res 34 3 (1988) 384-392
7. Burn D.H., and McBean E.A. Optimization modeling of water quality in an uncertain environment. Water Resour Res 21 7 (1985) 934-940
8. Chen H.W., and Chang N.B. Water pollution control in the river basin by fuzzy genetic algorithm-based multi-objective programming modeling. Water Sci Technol 37 8 (1998) 55-63
9. Cheung R.K.M., and Powell W.B. SHAPE - a stochastic hybrid approximation procedure for two-stage stochastic programs. Oper Res 48 1 (2000) 073-079
10. Chow V.T. Handbook of applied hydrology (1964), McGraw-Hill, New York
11. Clark B., and Wallace J. Global connections: Canadian and world issues (2003), Pearson Education Canada, Inc., Toronto, Canada
12. Coase R.H. The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3 (1960) 1-44
13. Collentine D. Search for the northwest passage: the assignation of NPS (non-point source pollution) rights in nutrient trading programs. Water Sci Technol 45 9 (2002) 227-234
14. Contant C.K., Duffy M.D., and Holub M.A. Determining tradeoffs between water quality and profitability in agricultural production: implications for nonpoint source pollution policy. Water Sci Technol 28 3-5 (1993) 27-34
15. Delgado M., Herrera F., Verdegay J.L., and Vila M.A. Postoptimality analysis on the membership function of a fuzzy linear programming problem. Fuzzy Set Syst 53 3 (1993) 289-297
16. Donigian A.S., and Huber W.C. Modeling of nonpoint source water quality in urban and nonurban areas. EPA/600/3-91/039 (1991), Environmental Research Laboratory, US EPA, Athens (GA)
17. Donigian A.S., Imhoff J.C., Bicknell B.R., and Kittle J.L. Application guide for the hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN (HSPF). EPA-600/3-84-065 (1984), Environmental Research Laboratory, US EPA, Athens (GA)
18. Dosskey M.G. Toward quantifying water pollution reduction in response to installing buffers on crop land. Environ Manage 28 5 (2001) 577-598
19. Edirisinghe N.C.P., and Ziemba W.T. Bounds for two-stage stochastic programs with fixed resources. Math Oper Res 19 2 (1994) 292-313
20. Fennessy M.S., and Cronk J.K. The effectiveness and restoration potential of riparian ecotones for the management of nonpoint source pollution, particularly nitrate. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27 4 (1997) 285-317
21. Hahn R.W., and Hester G.L. Marketable permits: lessons for theory and practice. Ecol Law Quart 16 2 (1989) 361-406
22. Harrington W., Krupnick A.J., and Peskin H.M. Policies for non-point source water pollution control. J Soil Water Conserv 40 1 (1985) 27-32
23. Huang G.H. A hybrid inexact-stochastic water management model. Eur J Oper Res 107 1 (1998) 137-158
24. Jarvie M., and Solomon B. Point-nonpoint effluent-trading in watersheds: a review and critique. Environ Impact Asses Rev 18 2 (1998) 135-157
25. Johanson R.C., Imhoff J.C., Kittle J.L., and Donigian A.S. Hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN (HSPF): users manual for release 8.0. EPA-600/3-84-066 (1984), US EPA, Athens (GA)
26. Kall P. Computational methods for solving two-stage stochastic linear programming problems. ZAMP 30 2 (1979) 261-271
27. Letson D. Point/nonpoint source pollution reduction trading and interpretive survey. Nat Res J 32 2 (1992) 219-232
28. Letson D, Crutchfield S, Malik A. Point/non-point source trading for managing agricultural pollutant loadings: prospects for coastal watersheds. US Dept. Agric., Econ. Res. Serv., AER-674; 1993.
29. Luo B., Maqsood I., Huang G.H., Yin Y.Y., and Han D.J. An inexact fuzzy two-stage stochastic model for quantifying the efficiency of nonpoint source effluent-trading under uncertainty. Sci Total Environ 347 (2005) 21-34
30. Luo B., Li J.B., Huang G.H., and Li H.L. A simulation-based interval two-stage stochastic model for agricultural nonpoint sources pollution control through land retirement. Sci Total Environ 361 1-3 (2006) 38-56
31. McCann B. US looks to trading's flexibility for effluent savings. Water 21 (2003) 10
32. McLaughlin F., and Yuzyk T.R. Lake Diefenbaker, Saskatchewan: a case study of reservoir sedimentation. Can Water Resour J 7 2 (1981) 391-392
33. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10 3 (1970) 282-290
34. O'Neil W.B., David M.H., Moore C., and Joeres E.F. Transferable discharge permits and economic efficiency: the Fox River. J Environ Econ Manage 10 4 (1983) 346-355
35. Renzetti S. Canadian agricultural water use and management. Department of Economics Working Paper Series, Brock University, Canada; 2006. Available from: .
36. Ruszczyński A., and Świe{ogonek}tanowski A. Accelerating the regularized decomposition method for two-stage stochastic linear problems. Eur J Oper Res 101 2 (1997) 328-342
37. Seiji H., Shogo M., Masataka W., and Xu B.H. HSPF simulation of runoff and sediment loads in the Upper Changjiang River Basin, China. J Environ Eng, ASCE 130 7 (2004) 801-815
38. Sen S. Subgradient decomposition and differentiability of the recourse function of a two-stage stochastic linear program. Oper Res Lett 13 3 (1993) 143-148
39. SERM (Saskatchewan Environment and Resource Management). Surface water quality objectives: MB 110. Saskatchewan Environment and Resource Management, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada; 1997.
40. Singh V.P. Computer models of watershed hydrology (1995), Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO
41. Stephenson K., Shabman L., and Geyer L. Toward an effective watershed-based effluent allowance trading system: identifying the statutory and regulatory barriers to implementation. Environ Lawyer 5 3 (1999) 775-815
42. Tanaka H., Okuda T., and Asai K. On fuzzy mathematical programming. J Cybernetics 3 4 (1974) 37-46
43. Tong S.C. Interval number and fuzzy number linear programming. Fuzzy Set Syst 66 3 (1994) 301-306
44. Tong S.T.Y., and Chen W.L. Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. J Environ Manage 66 4 (2002) 377-393
45. Uri N.D. A note on soil erosion and its environmental consequences in the united states. Water Air Soil Poll 129 1-4 (2001) 181-197
46. Van Slyke R.M., and Wets R.J.-B. L-shaped linear programs with applications to optimal control and stochastic programming. SIAM J Appl Math 17 4 (1969) 638-663
47. Wallender W., Rhoades J., Weinberg M., Lee S., Uptain C., and Purkey D. Irrigated land retirement. Irrig Drain Syst 16 4 (2002) 311-326
48. Wets R.J.B. Programming under uncertainty: the solution set. SIAM J Appl Math 14 5 (1966) 1143-1151
49. Wheaton E.E., and Chakravarti A.K. Dust storms in the Canadian prairies. Int J Climatol 10 8 (1990) 829-837
50. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8 (1965) 338-353
51. Zhang W., and Wang X.J. Modeling for point-nonpoint source effluent-trading: perspective of nonpoint sources regulation in Canada. Sci Total Environ 292 (2002) 167-176
52. Zimmermann H.J. Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Set Syst 1 1 (1978) 45-55