Empowerment research

The Handbook of Community Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 620-635

  Pennell, Joan ^a   Noponen, Helzi ^b   Weil, Marie ^c  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FORD FOUNDATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250776415     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452220819.n34     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Aboriginal Corrections Policy Unit. Four circles of Hollow Water.(1997). Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services. Catalog Number JS 5-1/15-1997E.
2. Altpeter M. Schopler J. H. Galinsky M. J. Pennell J. Participatory research as social work practice: When is it viable? Journal of Progressive Human Services 10 (2) (1999) 31-53doi:10.1300/J059v10n02_04 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J059v10n02_04
3. Bandura, A.(1997). Self-efficacy. New York: W. H. Freeman.
4. Chambers, C. A.(1963). Seedtime of reform: American social service and social action, 1918-1933. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5. Chambers C. A. Women in the creation of the profession of social work Social Service Review 60 (1) (1986) 1-33doi:10.1086/644347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/644347
6. Dahl, R. A.(1970). After the revolution? Authority in a good society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Dallmayr, F. R., 8 McCarthy, T. A. (Eds.). (1977). Understanding and social inquiry. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
8. Debo, A.(1970). A history of the Indians of the United States. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
9. Fawcett, J.(1999). The relationship of theory and research (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
10. Fetterman, D. M.(2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J., 8 Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452243573 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243573
12. Foster-Fishman P. G. Salem D. A. Chibnall S. Legler R. Yapchai C. Empirical support for the critical assumptions of empowerment theory American Journal of Community Psychology 26 (4) (1998) 507-536doi:10.1023/A:1022188805083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022188805083
13. Frank L. K. Science as a communication process Main Currents in Modern Thought 25 (1968) 45-53
14. Freire, P.(1989). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum. (Original work published 1968).
15. Friedmann, J.(1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Friedmann, J.(1992). Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
17. Fulcher L. Acknowledging culture in child and youth care practices Social Work Education 17 (3) (1998) 321-338doi:10.1080/02615479811220321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615479811220321
18. Gadamer, H.-G.(1979). The problem of historical consciousness (H. Fantel, Trans.). In P. Rabinow 8 W. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social science: A reader (pp. 103-160). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1963)
19. Geertz, C.(1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
20. Giroux, H. A.(1991). Modernism, postmodernism, and feminism: Rethinking the boundaries of educational discourse. In H. A. Giroux (Ed.), Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politics: Redrawing educational boundaries (pp. 1-59). Albany: State University of New York Press.
21. Green, J. W.(1995). Cultural awareness in the human services: A multi-ethnic approach. Boston: Allyn 8 Bacon.
22. Gutiérrez, L. M., Parsons, R. J., 8 Cox, E. O. (Eds.). (1998). Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
23. Hammersley, M.(1992). What’s wrong with ethnography? Methodological explorations. London: Routledge.
24. Hancock, T., 8 Minkler, M.(1997). “Community health assessment or healthy community assessment? Whose community? Whose health? whose assessment?” In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community Organizing and Community Building for Health, (pp. 139-156). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
25. Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26. Havemann, P.(1992). The indigenization of social control in Canada. In R. A. Silverman 8 M. O. Neilson (Eds.), Aboriginal peoples and Canadian criminal justice (pp. 111-119). Toronto, Canada: Harcourt, Brace.
27. Highlander Center 8 L. M. Phenix (Producer). (1995). You gotta move: Stories of change in the South [video recording]. Available from First Run Features, 153 Waverly Place, New York, NY 10014.
28. Hunt J. Kasynathan N. Reflections on microfinance and women’s empowerment Development Bulletin 57 (2002) 71-75
29. Kretzmann, J. P., 8 McKnight, J. L.(1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
30. Kuhn, T. S.(1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Lather, P.(1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy in the postmodern era. New York: Routledge.
32. Lewin K. Action research and minority problems Journal of Social Issues 2 (1946) 34-46doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
33. Lindblom, C. E., 8 Cohen, D. K.(1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34. Little Bear, L., Boldt, M., 8 Long, J. A. (Eds.). (1984). Pathways to self-determination: Canadian Indians and the Canadian state. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
35. Mayoux L. Microfinance and women’s empowerment: Rethinking “best practice.” Development Bulletin 57 (2002) 76-80
36. McTaggart, R. (Ed.). (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
37. Merriam-Webster. (Ed.). (2003). Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
38. Mondros, J. B., 8 Wilson, S. M.(1994). Organizing for power and empowerment. New York: Columbia University Press.
39. Noponen H. Loans to the working poor: A longitudinal study of credit, gender and the household economy International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 16 (2) (1992) 234-259doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1992.tb00171.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1992.tb00171.x
40. Noponen H. The Internal Learning System for participatory assessment of microfinance Small Enterprise Development 12 (4) (2001) 45-53doi:10.3362/0957-1329.2001.045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/0957-1329.2001.045
41. Noponen H. The Internal Learning System: A tool for participant and program learning in microfinance and livelihoods interventions Development Bulletin 57 (2002) 106-110
42. Noponen, H.(2003). The Internal Learning System: Impact assessment versus empowerment. In L. Mayoux (Ed.), Sustainable learning for women’s empowerment: Ways forward in microfinance.New Delhi: Sanskriti.
43. Parsons R. J. Empowerment: Purpose and practice principle in social work Social Work With Groups 14 (2) (1991) 7-21doi:10.1300/J009v14n02_02 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J009v14n02_02
44. Parsons, R. J.(1998). Evaluation of empowerment practice. In L. M. Guetiérrez, R. J. Parsons, 8 E. O. Cox (Eds.), Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook (pp. 204-219). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
45. Pennell, J.(1990). Knitting empowering configurations. In J. Turner (Ed.), Living the changes (pp. 188-195). Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
46. Rappaport, J.(1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, 8 L. Jason (Eds.), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods (pp. 51-63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10073-005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10073-005
47. Ricoeur, P.(1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation (J. B. Thompson, Ed. 8 Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Ristock, J. L., 8 Pennell, J.(1996). Community research as empowerment: Feminist links, postmodern interruptions. Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
49. Saleebey, D. (Ed.). (1997). The strengths perspective in social work practice (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
50. Schalock, R. L.(1995). Outcome-based evaluation. New York: Plenum Press.
51. Schumacher, E. F.(1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. New York: Harper 8 Row.
52. Shadish, W. R., Jr., Cook, T. D., 8 Leviton, L. C.(1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53. Simon, B. L.(1994). The empowerment tradition in American social work: A history. New York: Columbia University Press.
54. Smith, D. E.(1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
55. Sohng, S. S. L.(1998). Research as an empowerment strategy. In L. M. Guetiérrez, R. J. Parsons, 8 E. O. Cox (Eds.), Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook (pp. 187-203). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
56. Solomon, B. M.(1986). Black empowerment: Social work in oppressed communities. New York: Columbia University Press.
57. Staples L. H. Powerful ideas about empowerment Administration in Social Work 14 (2) (1990) 29-42doi:10.1300/J147v14n02_03 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J147v14n02_03
58. Stull, D. D., 8 Schensul, J. J. (Eds.). (1987). Collaborative research and social change: Applied anthropology in action. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
59. Usher C. L. Improving evaluability through self-evaluation Evaluation Practice 16 (1) (1995) 59-68doi:10.1016/0886-1633(95)90007-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633%2895%2990007-1
60. Walker R. Staton M. Multiculturalism in social work ethics Journal of Social Work Education 36 (3) (2000) 449-462
61. Whyte, W F.(1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park: Sage.
62. Winch, P.(1977). Understanding a primitive society. In F. R. Dallmayr 8 T. A. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding and social inquiry (pp. 159-188). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1964).
63. Zimbalist, S. E.(1977). Historic themes and landmarks in social welfare research. New York: Harper 8 Row.