Review focus: Boundaries in discourse analysis

Language in Society

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 595-611

  Wodak, Ruth ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250771401     PISSN: 00474045     EISSN: 14698013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S004740450606026X     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Austin, J. (1960)How to do things with words. London: Clarendon Press.
2. P., Baker, T., McEnery, A corpus–based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts, Journal of Language and Politics, (2005), 4, 197-226
3. Beaugrande, R. de, & Dressler, W. U. (1981).Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
4. Billig, M. (2003).Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique.In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (eds.),35–46.
5. Chilton, P. (2004).Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
6. P., Chilton, Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct, R., Wodak, P.A., Chilton, (eds.), A new agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, methodology, and interdisciplinarity, Amsterdam, Benjamins, (2005), 19-53
7. L., Chouliaraki, N., Fairclough, Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, (1999)
8. Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1992).Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. K., Ehlich, Language in the professions: Text and discourse, A., Grindsted, J., Wagner, (eds.), Communication for specific purposes/Fachsprachliche Kommunikation, Tübingen, Narr, (1992), 9-29
10. Ehlich, K. (2000).Diskurs. In H. Glück (ed.),Metzler Lexikon Sprache, 162–63. Stuttgart: Metzler.
11. Ensink, T., & Sauer, C. (2003) (eds.).The art of commemoration. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
12. Fairclough, N. (1992).Discourse and social change. London: Polity.
13. Fairclough, N. (2001).The discourse of New Labour: Critical discourse analysis.In M. Wetherell et al. (eds.),229–66.
14. Fairclough, N. (2003).Analyzing discourse: Text analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
15. Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997).Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.),256–84.
16. J., Flowerdew, Rhetorical strategies and identity politics in the discourse of colonial withdrawal, Journal of Language and Politics, (2002), 1, 149-180
17. Foucault, M. (1984).The orders of discourse. In M. Shapiro (ed.),The Language of Politics. 9–54. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. S., Freud, Das Unbehagen in der Kultur, In his, Studienausgabe, Vol. 9: Fragen der Gesellschaft: Ursprünge der Religion, Frankfurt a. Main, (1982), 191-270
19. Habermas, J. (1981).Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
20. Halliday, M.A.K. (2002).On grammar. Collected Works, vol. 1. London: Continuum.
21. H., Heer, W., Manoschek, A., Pollak, R., Wodak, Wie Geschichte gemacht wird: Erinnerungen an Wehrmacht und zweiten Weltkrieg, Vienna, Czernin, (2003)
22. Howarth, D. (2000).Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press
23. S., Jäger, Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of critical discourse analysis, R., Wodak, M., Meyer, (eds.), Methods in critical discourse analysis, London, Sage, (2001), 32-62
24. Johnstone, B. (2002).Discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
25. Lalouschek, J.; Menz, F.; & Wodak, R. (1990).Alltag in der Ambulanz. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
26. Lazar, M. (2005) (ed.).Feminist critical discourse analysis. London: Palgrave.
27. E., Leinfellner, Vom Bild ohne Rahmen zum Rahmen ohne Bild – und das Jenseits von Rahmen und Bild: Eine Diskussion zu “Text und Kontext”, O., Panagl, R., Wodak, (eds.), (2004), 267-296
28. Lutz, B., & Wodak, R. (1987).Information für Informierte. Vienna: Akademie der Wissenschaften.
29. U., Maas, Probleme und Traditionen der Diskursanalyse, Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung, (1988), 41, 717-729
30. J.R., Martin, R., Wodak, Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value, Amsterdam, Benjamins, (2003)
31. M., Meyer, Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA, R., Wodak, M., Meyer, (eds.), Methods in critical discouse analysis, London, Sage, (2001), 14-31
32. P., Muntigl, G., Weiss, R., Wodak, European Union discourses on unemployment: An interdisciplinary approach to employment policy-making and organizational change, Amsterdam, Benjamins, (2000)
33. Panagl, O., & Wodak, R. (2004) (eds.).Text & Kontext. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
34. Pfeiffer, O.; Strouhal, E.; & Wodak, R. (1987).Ein Mann auf dem Lande vor dem Gesetz. Folia Linguistica 20: 505–39.
35. Phillips, L., & Jørgensen, M. W. (2002, reprinted 2004).Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
36. Ranke, L. (1867–1890).Englische Geschichte. Samtliche Werke, vol. 15. Leipzig.
37. Reisigl, M. (in press).Diskurs =/= Diskurs =/= Diskurs. European Journal of Semiotics.
38. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001).Discourse and discrimination. London: Routledge.
39. Schiffrin, D.; Tannen, D.; & Hamilton, H. (2001) (eds.).The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2003).Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
41. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2004).Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.
42. Seidlhofer, Barbara (2003) (ed.).Controversies in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Thiesmeyer, L. (2004) (ed.).Discourse and silencing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
44. Titscher, S.; Meyer, M.; Wodak, R.; & Vetter, E. (2000).Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage.
45. Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.
46. van Dijk, T. A. (1990).Social cognition and discourse. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (eds.),Handbook of language and social psychology, 163–86. New York: John Wiley.
47. van Dijk, T. A. (1997) (ed.).Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
48. van Dijk, T. A. (2001).Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin et al. (eds.),352–71.
49. van Dijk, T. A. (2003).The discourse-knowledge interface. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (eds.),85–109.
50. van Leeuwen, T. (2005).Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
51. Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003) (eds.).Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
52. Wetherell, M.; Taylor, S.; & Yates, S. J. (2001) (eds.).Discourse as data. London: Sage.
53. Widdowson, H. G. (2004).Text, context, pretext. Critical issue in discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Wittgenstein, L. (1967).Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
55. Wodak, R. (1996).Disorders in discourse. London: Longman.
56. R., Wodak, et al., Critical discourse analysis and the study of doctor-patient interaction, B.-L., Gunnarsson, (eds.), The construction of professional discourse, London, Longman, (1997), 173-200
57. Wodak, R. (2004).Critical discourse analysis. In C. Seale et al. (eds.),Qualitative research practice, 197–213. London: Sage.
58. R., Wodak, Sprache und Politik. – Sprache in der Politik – Sprache/Sprechen über (Sprache in/und) Politik, Aptum, (2005), 2, 135-153
59. Wodak, R. (2005 b).Discourse analysis (Foucault). In D. Herman et al. (eds.),Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, 112–114. London: Routledge.
60. Wodak, R., & Busch, B. (2004).Approaches to media texts. In J. H. Downing (ed.),The Sage handbook of media studies, 105–23. London: Sage.
61. Wodak, R., & Chilton, P. A. (2005) (eds.).A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
62. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001) (eds.).Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.