Would you displace? It depends! A multivariate visual approach to intended displacement from an urban forest trail

Journal of Leisure Research

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 345-365

  Arnberger, Arne ^a   Haider, Wolfgang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Controlled experiment; Crowding; Social carrying capacity; Stated preference model; Urban forest; Use displacement; Visitor behavior

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL IMAGE; MODELING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RECREATIONAL FACILITY; SURVEY; TOURIST BEHAVIOR; URBAN FORESTRY;

AUSTRIA; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; VIENNA;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 34250743577     PISSN: 00222216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2007.11950111     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Addelman, S. (1962). Symmetrical and asymmetrical fractional factorial design plans. Technometrics, 4(1), 47-58.
2. Andereck, K. L., & Becker, R. H. (1993). Perceptions of carry-over crowding in recreation environments. Leisure Sciences, 15, 25-35.
3. Arnberger, A. (2003). Modellierung sozialer Tragfähigkeitsgrenzen von Erholungsgebieten. Dargestellt am Erholungsgebiet Wienerberg [Modeling social carrying capacities of recreation areas - The recreation area Wienerberg]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.
4. Arnberger, A., & Brandenburg, C. (2002). Visitor structure of a heavily used conservation area: The Danube Floodplains National Park, Lower Austria. In A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg & A. Muhar (Eds.), Monitoring and Management of Visitor flows in Recreational and Protected Areas (pp. 7-13). Vienna: Institute for Landscape Architecture and Landscape Management.
5. Arnberger, A., & Haider, W. (2005). Social effects on crowding preferences of urban forest visitors. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 3(3-4), 125-136.
6. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Learner, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58(10), 4602-4614.
7. Baum, A., & Paulus, P. B. (1991). Crowding. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 533-570). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.
8. Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application in travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Fredman, P., & Hörnsten, L. (2001). Perceived crowding, visitor satisfaction and trail design in Fulufjäll National Park Sweden. Report. Östersund, Sweden: European Tourism Research Institute.
10. Green, W. H. (1998). LIMDEP, Version 7.0 - User's manual revised edition. New York: Econometric Software.
11. Haider, W. (2002). Stated preference and choice models - A versatile alternative to traditional recreation research. In A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg & A. Muhar (Eds.), Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas (pp. 115-121). Vienna: Institute for Landscape Architecture and Landscape Management.
12. Haider, W., & Ewing, G. O. (1990). A model of tourist choices of hypothetical Caribbean destinations. Leisure Sciences, 12, 32-47.
13. Hall, T., & Shelby, B. (2000). Temporal and spatial displacement: Evidence from a high-use reservoir and alternate sites. Journal of Leisure Research 32, 435-456.
14. Hunt, L., Haider, W., & Bottan, B. (2005). Accounting for varying setting preferences among moose hunters. Leisure Sciences, 27, 297-314.
15. Johnson, A. K., & Dawson, C. (2001). Coping, crowding and satisfaction: A study of Adirondack Wilderness Hikers. Proceedings of the 2001 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, General Technical Report NE-289, USDA Forest Service, 25-31.
16. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Humanscape: Environments for People. Michigan: Ulrich's Books.
17. Kuentzel, W. F., & Heberlein, T. (1992). Cognitive and behavioral adaptations to perceived crowding: A panel study of coping and displacement. Journal of Leisure Research, 24, 377-393.
18. Laven, D., Manning, R. E., & Krymkowski, D. H. (2005). The relationship between visitor-based standards of quality and existing conditions in parks and outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences, 27, 157-173.
19. Lawson, S. R., & Manning, R. E. (2002). Tradeoffs among social, resource, and management attributes of the Denali Wilderness experience: A contextual approach to normative research. Leisure Sciences, 24, 297-312.
20. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods - Analysis and application. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
21. Luymes, D. T., & Tamminga, K. (1995). Integrating public safety and use into planning urban greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 391-400.
22. Manning, R. E. (2001). Carrying capacity as 'informed judgment': The values of science and the science of values. In W. A. Wayne & D. N. Cole (Eds.), Visitor Use Density and Wilderness Experience (pp. 21-28). Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service.
23. Manning, R. E., Lime, D. W., Freimund, W. A., & Pitt, D. G. (1996). Crowding norms at front-country sites: A visual approach to setting standards of quality. Leisure Sciences, 18, 39-59.
24. Manning, R. E., & Valliere, W. A. (2001). Coping in outdoor recreation: Causes and consequences of crowding and conflict among community residents. Journal of Leisure Research 33, 410-426.
25. Manning, R. F., Valliere W. A., Wang, B., & Jacobi, C. (1999). Crowding norms: Alternative measurement approaches. Leisure Sciences, 21, 97-115.
26. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105-142). New York: Academic Press.
27. Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities. Science, 167, 1461-1468.
28. Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
29. Orland, B., Daniel, T. C., & Haider, W. (1995). Calibrated images: Landscape visualizations to meet rigorous experimental design specifications. In M. J. Power, M. Strome, & T. C. Daniel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Geographic Information Seminar and the Resource Technology '94 Symposium (pp. 919-926). Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
30. Robertson, R. A., & Regula, J. A. (1994). Recreational displacement and overall satisfaction: A study of Central Iowa's licensed boaters. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 174-181.
31. Roggenbuck, J. W., Williams, D. R., & Watson, A. E. (1993). Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness. Environmental Management, 17, 187-197.
32. Schreyer, R., & Knopf, R. C. (1984). The dynamics of change in outdoor recreation environments-Some equity issues. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 2, 9-19.
33. Shelby, B., Bregenzer, N. S., & Johnson, R. (1988). Displacement and product shift: Empirical evidence from Oregon Rivers. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 274-288.
34. Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
35. Stankey, G. H. (1973). Visitor perception of wilderness recreation carrying capacity. Research Paper INT-142. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
36. Stewart, W., Larkin, K., Orland, B., & Anderson, D. (2003). Boater preferences for beach characteristics downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 201-211.
37. Sundstrom, E. (1978). Crowding as a sequential process: Review of research on the effects of population density on humans. In A. Baum & Y. M. Epstein (Eds.), Human response to crowding (pp. 31-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Train, K. E. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: University Press.