A personalised interface for web directories based on cognitive styles

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3196, Issue , 2004, Pages 159-166

  Magoulas, George D ^a   Chen, Sherry Y ^b   Dimakopoulos, Dionisios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive styles; Personalisation; User interfaces; Web based information retrieval

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); WORLD WIDE WEB;

ADAPTATION TECHNIQUES; COGNITIVE STYLES; EARLY DESIGN STAGES; NAVIGATION PATHS; PERSONALISATION; SMALL SCALE; WEB DIRECTORIES; WEB-BASED INFORMATION;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 34250743542     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30111-0_13     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Benyon D. and Höök K. Navigation in Information Spaces: supporting the individual. In Human-Computer Interaction: INTERACT'97, S. Howard, J. Hammond and G. Lindgaard (Eds), London: Chapman and Hall, 39-46, 1997.
2. Borgman, C. L. Why are Online Catalogs Still Hard to Use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 493-503, 1996.
3. Chen H., Houston A., Sewell R. and Schatz B. Internet browsing and searching: user evaluations of category map and concept space techniques, Journal of American Society of Information Science 49, 582-603, 1998.
4. Chen, S. Y. and Ford, N. J. Modelling User Navigation Behaviours in a Hypermedia-Based Learning System: An Individual Differences Approach. Int. J. of Knowledge Organization, 25, 67-78, 1998.
5. Chuang, Y-R. Teaching in a Multimedia Computer Environment: A study of effects of learning style, gender, and math achievement. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 1, 1, 1999. [http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/1999/1/10/].
6. Esichaikul, V., Smith, R. D., and Madely, G. R. The impact of learning style on problem-solving performance in a hypertext environment. Hypermedia, 6, 2, 101-111, 1994.
7. Ford, N. and Miller, D. Gender Differences in Internet Perceptions and Use. Aslib Proceedings, 48, 183-192, 1996.
8. Hicks, D. L. Tochterman, K. Eich, S., and Rose, T. Using Metadata to support customisation: Proceedings of the third IEEE Metadata Conference, Bethesda, MD (USA), 1999.
9. McDonald S. and Stevenson R. (1998) Navigation in Hyperspace: An evaluation of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext, Interacting with Computers 10(2), 129-142.
10. Magoulas G.D., Papanikolaou K.A., and Grigoriadou M. Adaptive web-based learning: accommodating individual differences through system's adaptation. British J. of Educational Technology, 34, 511-527, 2003.
11. Nahl, D. Information counselling inventory of affective and cognitive reactions while learning the Internet. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 2(2/3), 11-33, 1997.
12. Palmquist, R. A. and Kim, K.-S. Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance. J. of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 6, 558-66, 2000.
13. Riding, R. J. Cognitive Styles Analysis. Learning and Training Technology, Birmingham, 1991.
14. Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., and Cox, P. W. Field-dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1, 1-64, 1977.