Patient autonomy and informed consent in clinical practice;Pasientautonomi og informert samtykke i klinisk arbeid

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 127, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1644-1647

  Pedersen, Reidar ^a   Hofmann, Bjørn ^a,b   Mangset, Margrete ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL ASPECT; LIVING WILL; MENTAL CAPACITY; NORWAY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RISK FACTOR;

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL COMPETENCY; NORWAY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34250729824     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: 08077096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Faden R, Beauchamp TL. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
2. Buchanan AE, Brock DW. Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
3. Emanuel E. A review of the ethical and legal aspects of terminating medical care. Am J Med 1988; 84: 291-301.
4. Beuchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
5. British Medical Association. Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatment. London: BMJ Books, 2001.
6. Mill JS. On liberty. London: Penguin Books, 1975.
7. Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1988.
8. O'Neill O. Question of trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
9. Dworkin G. Autonomy and behaviour control. Hastings Cent Rep 1976; 6: 23-8.
10. Forde R, Vandvik IH. Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 73-7.
11. Rørtveit G, Strand R. Risiko, usikkerhet og uvitenhet i medisinen. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2001; 121: 1382-6.
12. Lloyd AJ. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Qual Health Care 2001; 10 (suppl 1): i14-8.
13. Gammelgaard A, Rossel P, Mortensen OS. Patients' perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: a Danish study. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 2313-24.
14. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Covey J et al. Presenting risk information - a review of the effects of «framing» and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun 2001; 6: 61-82.
15. Bowling A, Ebrahim S. Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk. Qual Health Care 2001; 10 (suppl 1): i2-8.
16. Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Behav Med 1998; 24: 81-8.
17. Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA 1984; 252: 2990-4.
18. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Assessing competence to consent to treatment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
19. Tunzi M. Can the patient decide? Evaluating capacity in practice. Am Fam Physician 2001; 64: 299-306.
20. British Medical Association and The Law Society. Assessment of mental capacity. London: BMJ Books, 2004.
21. Ganzini L, Volicer L, Nelson WA et al. Ten myths about decision-making capacity. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004; 5: 263-7.
22. Ot.prp. nr. 12 (1998-99). Lov om pasientrettigheter (pasientrettighetsloven).
23. Skjervheim H. Deltakar og tilskodar og andre essays. Oslo: Aschehoug, 1996.
24. Scottish Executive Justice. www.scotland.gov.uk/ Topics/Justice/Civil/ 16360/4927 (16.10.2006).
25. UK Clinical Ethics Network. www.ethics-network. org.uk/Ethics/eendlife. htm#advance (16.10.2006).
26. Strätling M, Scharf VE, Schmucker P. Mental competence and surrogate decision-making towards the end of life. Med Health Care Philos 2004; 7: 209-15.
27. Emanuel E, Emanuel L. Proxy decision making for incompetent patients. JAMA 1992; 267: 2067-71.
28. Lipkin KM. Identifying a proxy for health care as part of routine medical inquiry. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 1188-91.
29. Murtagh FEM, Thorns A. Evaluation and ethical review of a tool to explore patient preferences for information and involvement in decision making. J Med Ethics 2006; 32: 311-15.
30. Rundskriv IS-12/2004. Lov om pasientrettigheter. Oslo: Sosial- og helsedirektoratet, 2004.
31. Ot.prp. nr. 64 (2005-06). Om lov om endringer i pasientrettighetslova og biobanklova (helsehjelp og forsking - personar utan samtykkekompetanse).