Intellectual property, trade, and development: Can foes be friends?

Global Governance

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 171-177

  Shadlen, Kenneth C ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250721152     PISSN: 10752846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/19426720-01302003     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Keith Maskus and Mohan Penubarti, "How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property Rights?" Journal of International Economics 39 (1995): 227-248.
2. Michael Ryan, Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property (Washington, DC; Brookings Institution Press, 1998);
3. Duncan Matthews, Globalising Intellectual Property Rights: The TRIPs Agreement (London: Routledge, 2002);
4. Susan Sell, Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights (London: Cambridge University Press, 2003);
5. Meir Pugatch, The International Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004).
6. A worthwhile contrast, for example, is with the WTO's Agreement on Trade Related Investment Measures (TRIMs), which addresses only those investment regulations that are explicitly defined as "trade related."
7. Kenneth Shadlen, "Exchanging Development for Market Access? Deep Integration and Industrial Policy Under Multilateral and Regional-Bilateral Trade Agreements," Review of International Political Economy 12, no. 5 (December 2005): 750-775.
8. These are the three basic criteria that define an invention as patentable.
9. This section draws on Kenneth Shadlen, "Patents and Pills, Power and Procedure: The North-South Politics of Public Health in the WTO," Studies in Comparative International Development 39, no. 3 (Fall 2004): 76-108.