Robust probabilistic projections

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 148, Issue , 2006, Pages 33-40

  Archambeau, Cédric ^a   Delannay, Nicolas ^a   Verleysen, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CORRELATION THEORY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

CANONICAL CORRELATIONS; GAUSSIAN DENSITY MODEL; PROBABILISTIC PROJECTIONS; PROBABILISTIC REFORMULATIONS;

DATA MINING;

EID: 34250712895     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1143844.1143849     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Archambeau, C. (2005). Probabilistic models in noisy environments and their application to a visual prosthesis for the blind. Doctoral dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
2. Bach, F. R., & Jordan, M. I. (2005). A probabilistic interpretation of canoncial correlation analysis (Technical Report 688). Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley.
3. de la Torre, F., & Black, M. J. (2001). Robust principal component analysis for computer vision. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (pp. 362-369).
4. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39, 1-38.
5. Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417-441.
6. Hotelling, H. (1936). Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika, 28, 321-377.
7. Jolliffe, I. T. (1986). Principal component analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Liu, C., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). ML estimation of the t distribution using EM and its extensions, ECM and ECME. Statistica Sinica, 5, 19-39.
9. Neal, R. M., & Hinton, G. E. (1998). A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. In M. I. Jordan (Ed.), Learning in graphical models, 355-368. Kluwer.
10. Peel, D., & McLachlan, G. J. (2000). Robust mixture modelling using the t distribution. Statistics and Computing, 10, 339-348.
11. Roweis, S. T. (1998). EM algorithms for PCA and SPCA. Advances in Neural Information Processining Systems 10.
12. Tipping, M. E., & Bishop, C. M. (1999a). Mixtures of probabilistic principal component analyzers. Neural Computation, 11, 443-482.
13. Tipping, M. E., & Bishop, C. M. (1999b). Probabilistic principal component analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 61, 611-622.
14. Verbeek, J., Roweis, S., & Vlassis, N. (2004). Nonlinear CCA and PCA by alignment of local models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16.
15. Xu, L., & Yuille, A. L. (1995). Robust principal component analysis by self-organizing rules based on statistical physics approach. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6, 131-143.