Comparison of ultrasonic energy expenditures and corneal endothelial cell density reductions during modulated and non-modulated phacoemulsification

Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 209-218

  Davison, James A ^a,b  

^a Wolfe Eye Clinic   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BALANCED SALT SOLUTION;

AGED; ARTICLE; CELL DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OPERATION DURATION; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 34250704215     PISSN: 15428877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20070501-05     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Kelman CD. Phacoemulsification and aspiration: a new technique of cataract removal: a preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;64:23-35.
2. Bourne WM, McCarey BE, Kaufman HE. Clinical specular microscopy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1976;81:OP743-OP753.
3. Polack FM, Sugar A. The phacoemulsification procedure: II. Corneal endothelial changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1976;15:458-469.
4. Beesley RD, Olson RJ, Brady SE. The effects of prolonged phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium. Ann Ophthalmol. 1986;18:216-219, 222.
5. Riesz P, Kondo T. Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its biological implications. Free Radic Biol Med. 1992;13:247-270.
6. Holst A, Rolfsen W, Svensson B, Ollinger K, Lundgren B. Formation of free radicals during phacoemulsification. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12:359-365.
7. Werblin TP. Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification: model for evaluating endothelial damage after intraocular surgery. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:29-35.
8. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:1079-1084.
9. Ravalico G, Tognetto D, Palomba MA, Lovisato A, Baccara F. Corneal endothelial function after extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:1000-1005.
10. Saito K, Miyake K, McNeil PL, Yago K, Sugai N. Plasma membrane disruption underlies injury of the corneal endothelium by ultrasound. Exp Eye Res. 1999;4:431-437.
11. Walkow T, Anders N, Klebe S. Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: relation to preoperative and intraoperative parameters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:727-732.
12. Cameron MD, Poyer JF, Aust SD. Identification of free radicals produced during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:463-470.
13. Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS. New phacoemulsification technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1054-1060.
14. Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO. Continued endothelial cell loss ten years after lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1014-1022.
15. Dick HB, Kohnen T, Jacobi FK, Jacobi KW. Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification through a temporal clear corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:63-71.
16. Dodick JM. Laser photolysis of the human cataractous lens. Dev Ophthalmol. 1991;22:58-64.
17. Hayashi K, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Corneal endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification using the Small-Port Phaco. Ophthalmic Surg. 1994;25:510-513.
18. Akahoshi T. Phaco prechop: manual nucleofracture prior to phacoemulsification. Operative Tech J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;1:69-91.
19. Davison JA. Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 1.1 mm TurboSonics and 0.9 mm Aspiration Bypass System tips. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25:1386-1391.
20. Davison JA. Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 1.1 mm TurboSonics and 0.9 mm MicroTip. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1382-1385.
21. Davison JA. Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 straight and flared 0.9 mm Aspiration Bypass System tips. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:76-80.
22. Duran S, Zato M. Erbium:YAG laser emulsification of the cataractous lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27: 1025-1032.
23. McNeil JI. Flared phacoemulsification tips to decrease ultrasound time and energy in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1433-1436.
24. Nagahara K. Phaco-chop technique eliminates central sculpting and allows faster, safer phaco. Ocular Surgery News, International Edition. October 10, 1993:12-13.
25. Shepherd JR. In situ fracrure. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:436-440.
26. Dillman DM, Maloney WF. Fractional 2:4 phaco. In: Koch PS, Davison JA (eds). Textbook of Advanced Phacoemulsification Techniques. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 1991:241-255.
27. Gimbel HV. Divide and conquer nucleofractis phacoemulsification: development and variations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:281-291.
28. Hayashi K, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification using nuclear cracking procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:44-47.
29. Koch PS, Katzen LE. Stop and chop phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:566-570.
30. Koch P. The stop and chop phacoemulsification technique. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 1995;8:497-507.
31. Pirazzoli B, D'Eliseo D, Ziosi M, Acciarri R. Effect of phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium using phacofracture and phaco chop techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:967-969.
32. Joo CK, Kim YH. Phacoemulsification with a bevel-down phaco tip: phaco-drill. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23:1149-1152.
33. Kosrirukvongs P, Slade SG, Berkeley RG. Corneal endothelial changes after divide and conquer versus chip and flip phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23:1006-1012.
34. Diaz-Valle D, Benitez del Castillo Sanchez JM, Castillo A, Sayagues O, Moriche M. Endothelial damage with cataract surgery techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:951-955.
35. Vasavada AR, Singh R. Step-by-step chop in situ and lateral separation of very dense cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:156-159.
36. Fine IH, Packet M, Hoffman RS. Use of power modulations in phacoemulsification: choo choo chop and flip phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:188-197.
37. Badoza D, Fernandez Mendy J, Ganly M. Phacoemulsification using the burst mode. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1101-1105.
38. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III: the Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831-836.
39. Davison JA, Chylack LT. Clinical application of the Lens Opacities Classification System III in the performance of phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:138-145.
40. Arshinoff SA. Dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic soft shell technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:167-173.
41. Koch DD, Liu JF, Glasser DB, Merin LM, Haft E. A comparison of corneal endothelial changes after use of Healon or Viscoat during phacoemulsification. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:188-201.
42. Kreisler KR, Mortenson SW, Mamalis N. Endothelial cell loss following "modern" phacoemulsification by a senior resident. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23:158-160.
43. Davison JA, Cionni RJ, Snowdon JR, et al. Analysis of simultaneous surgeon and side-view video comparing in situ fracture and stop and chop phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:274-279.
44. DeBry P, Olson RJ, Crandall AS. Comparison of energy required for phaco-chop and divide and conquer phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:689-692.
45. Probst LE, Nichols BD. Corneal endothelial and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification with Amvisc Plus and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:725-730.
46. Dick B, Kohnen T, Jacobi KW. Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification and 3.5 vs 5 mm corneal tunnel incision [in German]. Ophthalmologe. 1995;92:476-483.
47. Graether JM, Davison JA, Harris GW, Watt RH, Widner RR, Sposito V. A comparison of the effects of phacoemulsification and nucleus expression on endothelial cell density. J Am Intraocular Implant Soc. 1983;9:420-423.
48. Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M, Brown LK. Comparison of sonic and ultrasonic phacoemulsification using the Staar Sonic Wave system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1581-1584.
49. Liesegang TJ. Viscoelastic substances in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;34:268-293.
50. Lane SS. Ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs): physical characteristics and clinical applications. In: Tasman W, Jaeger EA, eds. Duane's Ophthalmology CD-ROM, Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2006:Chapter 9.
51. Arshinoff SA, Albiani DA, Taylor-Laporte J. Intraocular pressure after bilateral cataract surgery using Healon, Healon 5, and Healon GV. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28:617-625.
52. Rainer G, Menapace R, Findl O, et al. Intraocular pressure rise after small incision cataract surgery: a randomised intraindividual comparison of two dispersive viscoelastic agents. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:139-142.
53. Singh R, Vasavada AR, Janaswamy G. Phacoemulsification of brunescent and black cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1762-1769.
54. Davison JA, Cionni RJ, Snowdon JR, et al. Simultaneous surgeon and side-view video analysis comparing in situ fracture and stop-and-chop phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:274-279.