A living system must have noncomputable models

Artificial Life

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 293-297

  Louie, A H ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

(M,R) systems; Life Itself; Noncomputability; Robert Rosen

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; ERRORS; LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES;

ARTIFICIAL LIFE; NONCOMPUTABILITY;

BIOLOGY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL FUNCTION; NOTE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CELL PHYSIOLOGY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 34250695562     PISSN: 10645462     EISSN: 15309185     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/artl.2007.13.3.293     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Chu, D., & Ho, W. K. (2006). A category theoretical argument against the possibility of artificial life: Robert Rosen's central proof revisited. Artificial Life, 12(1), 117-134.
2. Louie, A. H. (2005). Any material realization of the (M,R)-systems must have noncomputable models. Journal of Intregrative Neuroscience, 4(4), 423-436.
3. Louie, A. H. (2006). (M,R)-systems and their realizations. Axiomathes, 16(1-2), 35-64.
4. Mac Lane, S. (1998). Categories for the working mathematician (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Rosen, R. (2000). Essays on life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.
7. Silberschatz, A., & Galvin, P. B. (1998). Operating system concepts (5th ed.). Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Wolkenhauer, O. (2001). Systems biology: The reincarnation of systems theory applied in biology? Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2(3), 258-270.