Pull-up/pull-down corrections for ground-penetrating radar data

Archaeological Prospection

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 142-145

  Leckebusch, Jürg ^a  

^a Terra Vermessungen Ag   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Corrections; Geometry; Georadar; Interpretations; Pull down; Pull up

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250676142     PISSN: 10752196     EISSN: 10990763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/arp.302     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Alaei B. 2006. An integrated procedure for migration velocity analysis in complex structures of thrust belts. Journal of Applied Geophysics 59: 89-105.
2. Goodman D, Schneider K, Piro S, Hongo H, Higashi N. 2005. GPR and geophysical archaeometry. American Geophysical Union, Spring Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana; NS31A-03.
3. Leckebusch J. 2000. Two- and three-dimensional georadar surveys across a medieval choir: a case study in archaeology. Archaeological Prospection 7(3): 189-200.
4. Leckebusch J. 2003. Ground-penetrating radar: a modern three-dimensional prospection method. Archaeological Prospection 10(4): 213-240.
5. Leckebusch J, Peikert R. 2001. Investigating the true resolution and three-dimensional capabilities of ground-penetrating radar data in archaeological surveys: measurements in a sand box. Archaeological Prospection 8(1): 29-40.
6. Leckebusch J, Rychener J. 2004. Kein gläserner Boden? Ein kritischer Vergleich zwischen Bodenradardaten und Ausgrabungsresultaten in der römischen Stadt Augusta Raurica. Jahresberichte aus Augst und Kaiseraugst 25: 197-214.
7. Leckebusch J, Rychener J. 2005. Three-dimensional comparison between GPR and excavation results. 6th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Rome, Italy; 223-226.
8. Martinez A, Kruger JM, Franseen EK. 1998. Utility of ground-penetrating radar in near-surface, high-resolution imaging of Lansing-Kansas City (Pennsylvanian) limestone reservoir analogs. Kansas Geological Survey, Current Research in Earth Sciences 241(3): 43-59.