European securitization and biometric identification: The uses of genetic profiling

Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 36-43

  Johnson, Paul ^c   Williams, Robin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Biometrics; Genetic profiling; Identity; Interoperability

Indexed keywords

ART; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; DERMATOGLYPHICS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; ETHICS; EUROPE; EUROPEAN UNION; FORECASTING; FREEDOM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; MIGRATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIVACY; SOCIAL CONTROL;

BIOMETRY; DATA COLLECTION; DERMATOGLYPHICS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; EMIGRATION AND IMMIGRATION; EUROPE; EUROPEAN UNION; FORECASTING; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; FREEDOM; HUMAN BODY; HUMANS; PRIVACY; RECORDS; SECURITY MEASURES; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;

EID: 34250660594     PISSN: 00212571     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Elliott A. Subject to ourselves: Social theory, psychoanalysis and postmodernily. Cambridge: Polity; 1996.
2. Elliott A. Concepts of the self. Cambridge: Polity; 2001.
3. Rosenau PM. Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads and intrusions. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1992.
4. Sarup M. Identity, culture and the post-modern world. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1996.
5. Kripke S. Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell; 1984.
6. Available from: http://www.biteproject.org/reports.asp; last visited 13/10/2005.
7. Lyon D. Identity cards: Social sorting by database. Oxford: Internet Institute; (Internet Issue Brief 3); November 2004.
8. Lazer D (Ed.). DNA and the criminal justice system: The technology of justice. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press; 2004.
9. Lynch MD, Jasanoff S (Ed.). Contested identities: science, law and forensic practice. Social Studies of Science; special issue 1998;28.
10. Home Office. Police science and technology strategy 2004-2009. London: Home Office; 2004.
11. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. The Hague Programme: Ten priorities for the next five years - The partnership for European renewal in the field of freedom, security and justice COM (2005) 184 final; 13 May 2005.
12. European Parliament. Report on the European security strategy Strasburg: European Parliament; 2005. (Report n. A60072/2005; 14 April 2005).
13. Lyon D. Surveillance after September 11. Cambridge: Polity; 2003.
14. Van der Ploeg I. The illegal body: "Eurodac" and the politics of biometric identification. Ethics Inform Technol 1999; 1:295-302.
15. Home Office. European co-operation to secure borders, ensure effective policing and implement tough counter-terrorism measures. Press Release 221/2004. Available from: http//www.homeoffice.gov.uk; last visited 17/01/2007.
16. Van der Ploeg I. Biometrics, and the body as information: normative issues of the socio-technical coding of the body; 2005. Available from: http://www.biteproject.org/documents.asp; last visited 12/03/2007.
17. Pugliese J. Identity in question: A grammatology of DNA and forensic genetics. Intern J for the Semiot of Law 2000; 12: 419-44.
18. Williams R, Johnson P Forensic DNA databasing: A European perspective. Durham: Durham University; 2005. Available from: http://www.dur.ac.uk/pj.johnson/EU Interim Report 2005.pdf; last visited 22/09/2006.
19. Lyon D. Under my skin: From identification papers to body surveillance. In: Caplan J, Torpey J (Ed.). Documenting individual identity: The development of state practices in the modern world. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2001:291-310.
20. Hansard, House of Lords, Identity Cards Bill, 21 Mar 2005, Column 46. Available from: http://www.publications.parliament.uk; last visited 5/05/2005.
21. Hansard, House of Lords, Identity Cards Bill, 21 Mar 2005, Column 48. Available from: http://www.publications.parliament.uk; last visited 5/05/2005.
22. Mooki O. DNA typing as a forensic tool: applications and implications for civil liberties. South African J Human Rights 1997; 13:565-80.
23. Steventon B. Creating a DNA database. Journal of Criminal Law 1995;59:411-19.
24. Human Genetics Commission. Profiling the newborn: a prospective gene technology? London: Department of Health; 2005. Available from: http://www.hgc.gov.uk/UploadDocs/Contents/Documents/ Final%20Draft%20of%20Profiling%20Newborn%20Report%2003%2005.pdf; last visited 28/03/2007.
25. Home Office. European co-operation to secure borders, ensure effective policing and implement tough counter-terrorism measures. Press Release 221/2004. Available from: http//www.homeoffice.gov.uk; last visited 17/01/2007.
26. Williams R, Johnson P. Forensic DNA databasing: A European perspective. Durham University. Report 2005. Available from: http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.j.johnson/EU_Interim_Report_2005.pdf, last visited 1/06/2005.
27. Garland D. The culture of control: crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
28. Lyon D, Zureik E. Surveillance, privacy and the new technology. In: Zureik E (Ed.). Computers, surveillance and privacy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1996. p. 1-18.
29. Marx GT. What's new about the "New surveillance"? Classifying for change and continuity. Surveillance and Society 2002; 1:9-29. Available from: http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles/whatsnew.pdf; last visited 17/01/2007.
30. Haggerty KD, Ericson RV. The surveillant assemblage. Br J of Social 2000;51:605-22.