Surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Technical aspects and prognostic value;Marges après prostatectomie totale: Aspects techniques et valeur pronostique

Progres en Urologie

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 182-188

  Bastide, Cyrille ^a   Soulié, Michel ^b   Davin, Jean Louis ^c   Rossi, Dominique ^a  

^a HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

^b CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

^c Rhône Durance Clinic   (France)

Author keywords

Margin status; Prognostic factor; Prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

ADJUVANT THERAPY; BLADDER; CANCER INVASION; HUMAN; INNERVATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; VASCULARIZATION;

HUMANS; MALE; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 34250657697     PISSN: 11667087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(07)92260-5     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. OHORI M., WHEELER T.M., KATTAN M.W., GOTO Y., SCARDINO P.T.: Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J. Urol., 1995 ; 154 : 1818-1824.
2. BLUTE M.L., BOSTWICK D.G., SEAY T.M., MARTIN S.K., SLEZAK J.M., BERGSTRALH E.J., ZINCKE H. : Pathologic classification of prostate carcinoma: the impact of margin status. Cancer, 1998 ; 82 : 902-908.
3. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th edition. Springer 2002.
4. BLUTE M.L., BOSTWICK D.G., BERGSTRALH E.J., SLEZAK J.M., MARTIN S.K., AMLING C.L., ZINCKE H. : Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology, 1997 ; 50 : 733-739.
5. WATSON R.B., CIVANTOS F., SOLOWAY M.S. : Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy : detailed pathological analysis and prognosis. Urology, 1996 ; 48 : 80-90.
6. SOFER M., HAMILTON-NELSON K.L., CIVANTOS F., SOLOWAY M.S.: Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy : the influence of site and number on progression. J. Urol., 2002 ; 167 : 2453-2456.
7. WIEDER J.A., SOLOWAY M.S. : Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Urol., 1998 ; 160 : 299-315.
8. GUILLONNEAU B., EL-FETTOUH H., BAUMERT H., CATHELINEAU X., DOUBLET J.D., FROMONT G., VALLANCIEN G. : Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute. J. Urol., 2003 ; 169 : 1261-1266.
9. CHENG L., SLEZAK J., BERGSTRALH E.J., MYERS R.P., ZINCKE H., BOSTWICK D.G. : Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol., 2000 ; 18 : 2862-2868.
10. EMERSON R.E., KOCH M.O., JONES T.D., DAGGY J.K., JULIAR B.E., CHENG L. : The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence. J. Clin. Pathol., 2005 ; 58 : 1028-1032.
11. HULL G.W., RABBANI F., ABBAS F., WHEELER T.M., KATTAN M.W., SCARDINO P.T. : Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J. Urol., 2002 ; 167 : 528-534.
12. TIGRANI V.S., BHARGAVA V., SHINOHARA K., PRESTI J.C. Jr. : Number of positive systematic sextant biopsies predicts surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy. Urology, 1999 ; 54 : 689-693.
13. SEBE P., MAKHOUL B., AUDET J.F., CHOPIN D., ABBOU C.C., SALOMON L. : Prognostic value of the localization of positive resection margins after radical prostatectomy for intraprostatic tumors. Prog. Urol., 2003 ; 13: 425-429.
14. RASSWEILER J., SCHULZE M., TEBER D., MARRERO R., SEEMANN O., RUMPELT J., FREDE T. : Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique : oncological results in the first 500 patients. J. Urol., 2005 ; 173 : 761-764.
15. KAUSIK S.J., BLUTE M.L., SEBO TJ., LEIBOVICH B.C., BERGSTRALH E.J., SLEZAK J., ZINCKE H. : Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. Cancer, 2002 ; 95 : 1215-1219.
16. SALOMON L., ANASTASIADIS A.G., LEVREL O., KATZ R., SAINT F., DE LA TAILLE A., CICCO A., VORDOS D., HOZNEK A., CHOPIN D., ABBOU C.C : Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology, 2003 ; 61 : 386-390.
17. HALL G.S., KRAMER CE., EPSTEIN J.I. : Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. A comparative analysis of sampling methods. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 1992 ; 16 : 315-324.
18. STAMEY TA., SOZEN TS., YEMOTO CM., MCNEAL J.E. : Classification of localized untreated prostate cancer based on 791 men treated only with radical prostatectomy : common ground for therapeutic trials and TNM subgroups. J. Urol., 1998 ; 159 : 2009-2012.
19. SALOMON L., LEVREL O., DE LA TAILLE A., HOZNEK A., CHOPIN D., ABBOU C.C. : Localization of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Prog. Urol., 2002 ; 12: 628-634.
20. KORMAN HJ., LEU P.B., HUANG R.R., GOLDSTEIN N.S. : A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach ? J. Urol., 2002 ; 168: 991-994.
21. BOCCON-GIBOD L., RAVERY V., VORDOS D., TOUBLANC M., DELMAS V., BOCCON-GIBOD L. : Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions. J. Urol., 1998 ; 160 : 1383-1385.
22. OBEK C., SADEK S., LAI S., CIVANTOS F., RUBINOWICZ D., SOLOWAY M.S. : Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. Urology. 1999 ; 54 : 682-688.
23. WELDON V.E., TAVEL F.R., NEUWIRTH H., COHEN R. : Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy. J. Urol., 1995 ; 153 : 1570-1571.
24. HARRIS M.J. : Radical perineal prostatectomy : cost efficient, outcome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management. Eur. Urol., 2003 ; 44 : 303-308.
25. CURTO F., BENIJTS J., PANSADORO A., BARMOSHE S., HOEPFFNER J.L., MUGNIER C., PIECHAUD T., GASTON R. : Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : our technique. Eur. Urol., 2006 ; 49 : 344-352.
26. SOFER M., HAMILTON-NELSON K.L., SCHLESSELMAN J.J., SOLOWAY M.S. : Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol., 2002 ; 20 : 1853-1858.
27. PALISAAR R.J., NOLDUS J., GRAEFEN M., ERBERSDOBLER A., HAESE A., HULAND H. : Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure. Eur. Urol., 2005 ; 47 : 176-184.
28. SMITH R.C., PARTIN A.W., EPSTEIN J.I., BRENDLER C.B. : Extended followup of the influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and extensive capsular perforation. J. Urol., 1996 ; 156 : 454-458.
29. POON M., RUCKLE H., BAMSHAD B.R., TSAI C., WEBSTER R., LUI P. : Radical retropubic prostatectomy : bladder neck preservation versus reconstruction. J. Urol., 2000 ; 163 : 194-198.
30. SROUGI M., NESRALLAH L.J., KAUFFMANN J.R., NESRALLAH A., LEITE K.R. : Urinary continence and pathological outcome after bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy : a randomized prospective trial. J. Urol., 2001 ; 165 : 815-818.
31. LOWE B.A. : Comparison of bladder neck preservation to bladder neck resection in maintaining post-prostatectomy urinary continence. Urology, 1996 ; 48 : 889-893.
32. KATZ R., SALOMON L., HOZNEK A., DE LA TAILLE A., ANTIPHON P., ABBOU C.C. : Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation. J. Urol., 2003 ; 169 : 2049-2052.
33. VILLERS A. : Radical prostatectomy-Bladder neck dissection and urethrovesical anastomosis. Prog. Urol., 2005 ; 15 : 1111-1112.
34. DELIVELIOTIS C., PROTOGEROU V., ALARGOF E., VARKARAKIS J.: Radical prostatectomy : bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing-effects on continence and positive margins. Urology, 2002 ; 60 : 855-858.
35. SHELFO S.W., OBEK C., SOLOWAY M.S. : Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy : impact on pathologic outcome, anastomotic strictures, and continence. Urology, 1998 ; 51 : 73-78.
36. BIANCO F.J., GRIGNON D.J., SAKR W.A., SHEKARRIZ B., UPADHYAY J., DORNELLES E., PONTES J.E. : Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation : impact of a positive margin. Eur. Urol., 2003 ; 43 : 461-466.
37. SOLOWAY M.S., NEULANDER E. : Bladder-neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Semin. Urol. Oncol., 2000 ; 18 : 51-56.
38. KARAKIEWICZ P.I., EASTHAM J.A., GRAEFEN M., CAGIANNOS I., STRICKER P.D., KLEIN E., CANGIANO T., SCHRODER F.H., SCARDINO P.T., KATTAN M.W. : Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer : multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology, 2005 ; 66 : 1245-1250.
39. GROSSFELD G.D., CHANG J.J., BROERING J.M., MILLER D.P., YU J., FLANDERS S.C., HENNING J.M., STIER D.M., CARROLL P.R. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment : data from the CaPSURE database. J. Urol., 2000 ; 163 : 1189-1190.
40. EPSTEIN J.I., PIZOV G., WALSH P.C. : Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer, 1993 ; 71 : 3582-3593.
41. CONNOLLY S.S., OTOOLE G.C., O'MALLEY K.J., MANECKSHA R., O'BRIEN A., MULVIN D.W., QUINLAN D.M. : Positive apical surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy, truth or artefact ? Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 2004 ; 38 : 26-31.
42. VORDOS D., RAVERY V., TOUBLANC M., BOCCON-GIBOD L., DELMAS V., BOCCON-GIBOD L. : Complete perineal prostatectomy carries an increased risk of capsular incision in healthy and cancerous tissue. Prog. Urol., 1998 ; 8 : 232-239.
43. KHAN M.A., PARTIN A.W., MANGOLD L.A., EPSTEIN J.I., WALSH P.C. : Probability of biochemical recurrence by analysis of pathologic stage, Gleason score, and margin status for localized prostate cancer. Urology, 2003 ; 62 : 866-871.
44. AYDIN H., TSUZUKI T., HERNANDEZ D., WALSH P.C., PARTIN A.W., EPSTEIN J.I. : Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression. Urology, 2004 ; 64: 551-555.
45. DEBRAS B., GUILLONNEAU B., BOUGARAN J., CHAMBON E., VALLANCIEN G. : Prognostic significance of seminal vesicle invasion on the radical prostatectomy specimen. Rationale for seminal vesicle biopsies. Eur. Urol., 1998 ; 33 : 271-277.
46. SOFER M., SAVOIE M., KIM S.S., CIVANTOS F., SOLOWAY M.S. : Biochemical and pathological predictors of the recurrence of prostatic adenocarcinoma with seminal vesicle invasion. J. Urol., 2003 ; 169 : 153156.
47. TEFILLI M.V., GHEILER E.L., TIGUERT R., BANERJEE M., SAKR W., GRIGNON D.J., PONTES J.E., WOOD D.P. Jr. : Prognostic indicators in patients with seminal vesicle involvement following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J. Urol., 1998 ; 160 : 802-806.
48. MASTERSON TA., PETTUS J.A., MIDDLETON R.G., STEPHENSON R.A. : Isolated seminal vesicle invasion imparts better outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer : prognostic stratification of pt3b disease by nodal and margin status. Urology, 2005 ; 66 : 152-155.
49. CHENG L., DARSON M.F., BERGSTRALH E.J., SLEZAK J., MYERS R.P., BOSTWICK D.G. : Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma. Cancer, 1999 ; 86 : 1775-1782.
50. FREEDLAND S.J., ARONSON W., PRESTI J.C. JR, KANE C.J., TERRIS M.K., ELASHOFF D., AMLING CL. : The SEARCH Database Study Group. Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database. J. Urol., 2003 ; 169 : 2142-2146.
51. SERNI S., MASIERI L., MINERVINI A., LAPINI A., NESI G., CARINI M.: Cancer progression after anterograde radical prostatectomy for pathologic Gleason score 8 to 10 and influence of concomitant variables. Urology, 2006 ; 67 : 373-378.
52. LAU W.K., BERGSTRALH E.J., BLUTE MX., SLEZAK J.M., ZINCKE H. : Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer : influence of concomitant pathological variables. J. Urol., 2002 ; 167: 117-122.
53. MIAN B.M., TRONCOSO P., OKIHARA K., BHADKAMKAR V., JOHNSTON D., REYES A.O., BABAIAN R.J. : Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone. J. Urol., 2002 ; 167 : 1675-1680.