CT colonoscopy in 2007: The next standard for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk subjects?

Endoscopy

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 542-544

  Heresbach, Denis ^a   Ponchon, T ^b  

^a PONTCHAILLOU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON POLYP; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EDITORIAL; EUROPE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL ETHICS; META ANALYSIS; OCCULT BLOOD; PATIENT SAFETY; PREDICTION; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TUMOR VOLUME; UNITED STATES; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK; STANDARD;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EUROPE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RISK; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34250652419     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966528     Document Type: Editorial

References (26)

1. Kim D et al. Computed tomographic colonography for colorectal screening. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 542-547
2. Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 635-650
3. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ et al. Computed tornographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1832-1844
4. Church JM. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 481-485
5. Gschwantler M, Kriwanek S, Langner E et al. High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 14: 183-188
6. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Altendorf-Hofmann A et al. Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by size and site. Int J Colorect Dis 1997; 12: 267-271
7. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H, Fiarman GS. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 343-348
8. Souques M, Lassalle M, Guldner L et al. Colorectal polyps and cancers diagnosed by pathologists in Ile de France Region. Crisapif-Petri study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2006; 30: 587-593
9. Eide J. Risk of colorectal cancer in adenoma-bearing individuals within a defined population. Int J Cancer 1986; 38: 173-176
10. Hur C, Chung DC, Schoen RE, Gazelle GS. The management of small polyps found by virtual colonoscopy: results of a decision analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 237-244
11. Kudo SE, Kashida H. Flat and depressed lesions of the colorecturn. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3 (7 Suppl 1): S33-S36
12. Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I et al. Efficacy of high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum: a prospective analysis. Gut 2004; 53: 284-290
13. Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, Fork FF. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 2002; 51: 550-555
14. Jaramillo E, Watanabe M, Slezak P, Rubio C. Flat neoplastic lesions of the colon and rectum detected by high-resolution video endoscopy and chromoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 114-122
15. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000; 355: 1211-1214
16. Hart AR, Kudo S, Mackay EH et al. Flat adenomas exist in asymptomatic people: important implications for colorectal cancer screening programmes. Gut 1998; 43: 229-231
17. Hur C, Gazelle G, Zalis M, Podolsky D. An analysis of the potential impact of computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) on colonoscopy demand. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 1312-1321
18. Ladabaum U, Song K, Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1151-1162
19. Hur C, Gazelle GS, Hsu EH et al. The effect of prior colonic imaging on endoscopic productivity: potential impact of computed tomographic colonography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 1124-1127
20. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005; 236: 3-9
21. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA. Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 328-337
22. Bosworth HB, Rockey DC, Paulson EK et al. Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests. Am J Med 2006, 119: 791-799
23. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP et al. Acceptance by patieqts of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 913-921
24. Phillips KA, Liang SY, Ladabaum U et al. Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Med Care 2007; 45: 160-167
25. El-Serag HB, Petersen L, Hampel H et al. The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 2202-2208
26. Heresbach D, Manfredi S, D'Halluin PN et al. Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 427-433