Pronominalization in American Sign Language

Sign Language and Linguistics (Online)

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 245-265

  Kegl, Judy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250632656     PISSN: 13879316     EISSN: 1569996X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sll.6.2.08keg     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bahan, B. (1996). Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA.
2. Berenz, N. (1996). Person deixis in Brazilian Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
3. DeMatteo, A. (1977). "Visual imagery and visual analogues in American Sign Language." In L.Friedman (ed.), On the other hand. New perspectives on American Sign Language, pp. 109-136. New York: Academic Press.
4. Dixon, R.M.W. (1972). The Dyirbal language of Northern Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Edge, V.L. & L. Herrmann. (1977). "Verbs and the determination of subject in American Sign Language." In L.A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language, pp. 137-179. New York: Academic Press.
6. Friedman, L.A. (1975). "On the semantics of space time and person reference in the American Sign Language." Language 51:940-961.
7. Friedman, L.A. (1976). "The manifestation of subject, object, and topic in American Sign Language." In C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, pp. 127-148. New York: Academic Press.
8. Frishberg, N. (1975). "Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language." Language 51: 676-719.
9. Kegl, J.A. (1985). "Causative marking and the construal of agency in American Sign Language." In I.W. Eilfort, P.D. Kroeber and K.L. Peterson (eds.), CLS 21, Part 2: Papers from the parasession on Causatives and Agentivity, pp. 120-137. Chicago, Illinois: Chicago Linguistic Society.
10. Kegl, J.A. & R. Wilbur. (1976). "When does structure stop and style begin? Syntax, morphology and phonology vs. stylistic variation in American Sign Language." In S. Mufwene, C. Walker and S. Steever (eds.), Papers from the twelfth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 376-396. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
11. Kegl, J. (1995). "The manifestation and grammatical analysis of clitics in American Sign Language." In A. Dainora, R. Hemphill, B. Luka, B. Need & S. Pargman (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-first annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on Clitics, pp. 140-167. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
12. Kuno, S. (1972). "Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English." Linguistic Inquiry 3(3): 269-320.
13. Kuno, S. (1976). "Subject, theme and speaker's empathy - a reexamination of relativization phenomena." In C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, pp. 417-444. New York: Academic Press.
14. Lacy, R. (1974). "Putting some of the syntax back into semantics." Presented at the 49th Annual Meeting, LSA. Unpublished ms. University of California, San Diego. Reprinted this volume.
15. Mandel, M. (1975). "Iconic devices in American Sign Language." Unpublished ms., University of California, Berkeley.
16. Nakai, Satoru. (1976). "A study of anaphoric relations in Japanese". Unpublished ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
17. Perlmutter, D. (1971). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18. Shepard-Kegl, J.A. (1985). Locative relations in American Sign Language word formation, syntax, and discourse. Doctoral dissertation, MIT Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.
19. Supalla, T. (1990). "Serial verbs of motion in ASL." In S. Fischer & P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, Volume 1: Linguistics, pp. 127-152. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
20. Witten, E. (1976). "Pronominalization and sloppy identity." Unpublished ms., Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.