Economical evaluation of logistics centres establishment

Transport

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 111-117

  Meidutė, Ieva ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Intermodal transport; Logistics center; Multi modal transport

Indexed keywords

COSTS; INVESTMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

INTERMODAL TRANSPORT; LOGISTICS CENTERS; MULTI MODAL TRANSPORT;

LOGISTICS;

EID: 34250630930     PISSN: 16484142     EISSN: 16483480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16484142.2007.9638108     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. PALSAITIS, R. Logistics centers and transit transport interfaces in Lithuania. In Scientific Proceedings of Riga Technical University. Economics and Business. Business and Management. Riga, 2004, p. 83-88.
2. PALSAITIS, R. Logistics centers influence on economical development of the region. In Conference Proceedings. Development of Logistics, Transport and Communication Services in the Baltic Sea Region. International Conference. Vilnius, 2004, p. 21-26.
3. Synthesis Report. FV 2000. Research Project, European Commission, Brussels, 1999.
4. Logistics centres directions for use. EUROPLATFORMS EEIG. Brussels, 2004, p. 40.
5. JOHANEESSEN, S.; SOT EM O. Logistics organizations: ideologies, principles and practice. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2002, Vol 13, No 1, p. 8-16.
6. New generation terminal and terminal node concepts in Europe. TERMINET Research Project, European Commission, Brussels, 1997, p. 160.
7. European Commission. Communication from the European Commission of public private partnerships of Trans-European networks projects. Brussels, 1997, p. 80.
8. Reassessment of the feasibility study for the creation of a national freight village in Peraeus, Mentor Programme, European Commission, Brussels, 1996, p. 120.
9. KONINGS, J. W. Integrated centres for the transhipment, storage, collection, distribution of goods. Transport Policy, 1994, Vol III, No 1/2, p. 3-11.
10. European Commission. Communication from the European Commission of public - private partnerships of Trans-European networks projects. Brussels, 1997, p. 60.
11. MOLES, P.; WILLIAMS, D. Privately funded infrastructure in the UK: participants’ risk in the Skye Bridge project. Transport Policy, 1995, Vol 2, No 2, p. 129-134.
12. The PROFIT Methodology. PROFIT Research Project, European Commission, Brussels, 2000, p. 140.
13. YE, S.; TIONG, R. L. NPV-risk method in infrastructure project investment evaluation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2000, ASCE 126, No 3, p. 227-233.
14. Innovations in decision analysis for transport initiatives. EUNET, Research project, European Commission, Brussels, 1998, p. 140.
15. Transhipment systems description and analysis. IMPULSE Research Project, European Commission, Brussels, 1998, p. 110.
16. Logistics centres in Lithuania: analysis of birth processes. Transport Research Institute (TRI), Vilnius Gedimi-nas Technical University, Lithuania. Networking logistics centres in the Baltic Sea Region (NeLoC). BSR Interreg IIIB, 2003, p. 60.
17. Quality of terminals. IQ Research Project, European Commission, Brussels, 1998, p. 120.
18. TSAMBOULAS, D.; DIMITROPOULOS, J. Appraisal of investments in European nodal centres for goods: a comparative analysis. Transportation, 1999, Vol 33, p. 141-156.
19. Cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis for new transport infrastructure in the field of nodal centres for goods. EURET, Study, European Commission, Brussels, 1995, p. 140.
20. TSAMBOULAS, D.; KAPROS, S. Freight village evaluation under uncertainty with public and private financing. Transport Policy, 2003, Vol 10, No 2, p. 141-156.