Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers

Transfusion

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1276-1280

  Toni, Chiara ^b   Domenici, Ranieri ^b   Presciuttini, Silvano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; AUTOSOMAL INHERITANCE; CHROMOSOME MARKER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DAUGHTER; FATHER; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; MOTHER; PARENTAGE ANALYSIS; PEDIGREE; PROBABILITY; PROGENY; RELATIVE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; X CHROMOSOME;

CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, X; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; PROBABILITY;

EID: 34250628354     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01270.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Evett IW, Weir BS. Interpreting DNA evidence. Sunderland (MA) : Sinauer Associates Inc. 1998.
2. Brenner CH. A note on paternity computation in cases lacking a mother. Transfusion 1993 33 : 51 4.
3. Bishai D, Astone N, Argys L, et al. A national sample of US paternity tests: do demographics predict test outcomes? Transfusion 2006 46 : 849 53.
4. Presciuttini S, Toni C, Cerri N, et al. Four unusual cases of disputed paternity evaluated by a likelihood ratio test based on the number of alleles shared identical by state (IBS). In : Progress in forensic genetics 9. Amsterdam : Elsevier 2003. p. 6 29 32.
5. Wenk RE, Gjertson DW, Chiafari FA, Houtz T. The specific power of parentage exclusion in a child's blood relatives. Transfusion 2005 45 : 440 4.
6. Birus I, Marcikic M, Lauc D, et al. How high should paternity index be for reliable identification of war victims by DNA typing? Croat Med J 2003 44 : 322 6.
7. Brenner CH. Some mathematical problems in the DNA identification of victims in the 2004 tsunami and similar mass fatalities. Forensic Sci Int 2006 157 : 172 80.
8. Presciuttini S, Ciampini F, Alu M, et al. Allele sharing in first-degree and unrelated pairs of individuals in the GeFI AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus database. Forensic Sci Int 2003 131 : 85 9.
9. Presciuttini S, Cerri N, Turrina S, et al. Validation of a large Italian Database of 15 STR loci. Forensic Sci Int 2006 156 : 266 8.
10. Calafell F, Shuster A, Speed WC, et al. Genealogy reconstruction from short tandem repeat genotypes in an Amazonian population. Am J Phys Anthropol 1999 108 : 137 46.
11. Presciuttini S, Bramanti B, Hummel S, Herrmann B. Assessing relationships in an ancient skeletal collection by the number of alleles shared identical by state among pairs of individuals. In : Progress in forensic genetics 9. Amsterdam : Elsevier 2003. p. 6 39 42.
12. Wenk RE, Houtz T, Chiafari FA. Maternal typing and test sufficiency in parentage analyses. Transfusion 2006 46 : 199 203.
13. Wenk RE, Chiafari FA, Gorlin J, Polesky HF. Better tools are needed for parentage and kinship studies. Transfusion 2003 43 : 979 81.
14. Presciuttini S, Toni C, Marroni F, et al. The number of STR markers necessary to resolve relationships in deficiency paternity cases. Progress in forensic genetics 10. Amsterdam : Elsevier 2004. p. 5 41 3.
15. Hering S, Kuhlisch E, Szibor R. Development of the X-linked tetrameric microsatellite marker HumDXS6789 for forensic purposes. Forensic Sci Int 2001 119 : 42 6.
16. Edelmann J, Hering S, Kuhlisch E, Szibor R. Validation of the STR DXS7424 and the linkage situation on the X-chromosome. Forensic Sci Int 2002 125 : 217 22.
17. Toni C, Presciuttini S, Spinetti I, Domenici R. Population data of four X-chromosome markers in Tuscany, and their use in a deficiency paternity case. Forensic Sci Int 2003 137 : 215 6.
18. Turrina S, Atzei R, De Leo D. Polymorphism of four X-chromosomal STRs. DXS7423, DXS7424, DXS8378 and DXS6809 in a North Italian population sample and their use in kinship testing. Forensic Sci Int 2006 Mar 23 [Epub ahead of print].
19. Presciuttini S, Toni C, Tempestini E, et al. Inferring relationships between pairs of individuals from locus heterozygosities. BMC Genet 2002 3 : 23.
20. Lange K, Cantor R, Horvath S, et al. Mendel version 4.0: a complete package for the exact genetic analysis of discrete traits in pedigree and population data sets. Am J Hum Genet 2001 69 (Suppl A1886.
21. Garber R, Morris J. General equation for the average power of exclusion for genetic systems of n codominant alleles in one-parent and in no-parent cases of disputed parentage. In : Walker R, editor. Inclusion probabilities in parentage testing. Arlington (VA) : American Association of Blood Banks 1983. p. 2 77 80.
22. Desmarais D, Zhong Y, Chakraborty R, et al. Development of a highly polymorphic STR marker for identity testing purposes at the human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA). J Forensic Sci 1998 43 : 1046 9.
23. Szibor R, Krawczak M, Hering S, et al. Use of X-linked markers for forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med 2003 117 : 67 74.
24. Bini C, Ceccardi S, Ferri G, et al. Development of a heptaplex PCR system to analyse X-chromosome STR loci from five Italian population samples: a collaborative study. In : Progress in forensic genetics 10. Amsterdam : Elsevier 2004. p. 2 72 4.
25. Matise TC, Sachidanandam R, Clark AG, et al. A 3.9-centimorgan-resolution human single-nucleotide polymorphism linkage map and screening set. Am J Hum Genet 2003 73 : 271 84.
26. Chakraborty R, Hedrick PW. Paternity exclusion and the paternity index for two linked loci. Hum Hered 1983 33 : 13 23.