Some global and specific thoughts about some global and specific issues

Applied Neuropsychology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 26-36

  Faust, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; BIPOLAR DISORDER; COGNITION; EPILEPSY; EPISTEMOLOGY; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; INTELLIGENCE TEST; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PERSONALITY TEST; REVIEW; THINKING;

EID: 34250616210     PISSN: 09084282     EISSN: 15324826     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09084280701280411     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571-582.
2. Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95-106.
3. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
4. Dawes, R. H., & Meehl, P. E. (1966). Mixed group validation: A method for determining the validity of diagnostic signs without using criterion groups. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 63-67.
5. Einhorn, H. J. (1986). Accepting error to make less error. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 387-395.
6. Faust, D. (2007). Decision research can increase the accuracy of clinical judgment and thereby improve patient care. In S. O. Lilienfeld & W. O'Donohue (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science: 17 principles that every mental health professional should understand (pp. 49-76). New York: Routledge.
7. Faust, D., & Ackley, M. A. (1998). Did you think it was going to be easy? Some methodological suggestions for the investigation and development of malingering detection techniques. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 1-54). New York: Plenum.
8. Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E . (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 292-323.
9. Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical vs. mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30.
10. Jensen, A. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
11. Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (2nd ed.) (B Haigh, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
12. MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1991). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. In P. E. Meehl, Selected philosophical and methodological papers (pp. 249-264; C. A. Anderson & K. Gunderson, Eds.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Reprinted from Psychological Review, 1948, 55, 95-107.)
13. Meehl, P. E. (1995). Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist, 50, 266-275.
14. Meehl, P. E. (1996). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence (New Preface). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield/Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1954).
15. Meehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1994). Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and means below a sliding scale (MAMBAC procedure). Psychological Reports, 74, 1059-1274.
16. Meehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1996). Taxometric analysis: II. Detecting toxonicity using covariance of two quantitative indicators in successive intervals of a third indicator (MAXCOV procedure). Psychological Reports, Monograph Supplement, 1-V78, 1091-1227.
17. Waller, N. G., & Meehl, P. E. (1998). Multivariate taxometric procedures: Distinguishing types from continua. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Waller, N. G., Yonce, L. J., Grove, W. M., Faust, D., & Lenzenweger, M. F. (Eds.). (2006). A Paul Meehl reader: Essays on the practice of scientific psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.