메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 408-413

When caring for critically ill patients, do clinicians have a responsibility to be innovative and try unproven approaches when accepted approaches are failing?

Author keywords

Adventurism; Clinical research; Clinical trials; Ethics; Evidence based medicine; FDA; Food and Drug Administration; Investigational drugs; Patient safety

Indexed keywords

NEW DRUG;

EID: 34250613179     PISSN: 00201324     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper
Times cited : (7)

References (12)
  • 1
    • 66949111788 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Experimental treatments? Unapproved but not always unavailable
    • Internet. Jan-Feb. Available at Accessed Feb 27, 2007
    • Thompson L. Experimental treatments? Unapproved but not always unavailable. [Internet]. FDA Consumer Magazine; Jan-Feb 2000. Available at http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2000/100-exp.html (Accessed Feb 27, 2007
    • (2000) FDA Consumer Magazine
    • Thompson, L.1
  • 2
    • 0003525850 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Washington DC: National Academy Press
    • Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
    • (2001) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
  • 3
  • 6
    • 0141953257 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients' care
    • DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1
    • Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003;362(9391):1225-1230. (Pubitemid 37255352)
    • (2003) Lancet , vol.362 , Issue.9391 , pp. 1225-1230
    • Grol, R.1    Grimshaw, J.2
  • 8
    • 0035650856 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Understanding why we agree on the evidence but disagree on the medicine
    • Rubenfeld GD. Understanding why we agree on the evidence but disagree on the medicine. Respir Care 2001;46(12):1442-1449. (Pubitemid 33759927)
    • (2001) Respiratory Care , vol.46 , Issue.12 , pp. 1442-1449
    • Rubenfeld, G.D.1
  • 9
    • 66949179644 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United States et al v Rutherford et al (certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit). US v Rutherford, 442 US 544, 1979
    • United States et al v Rutherford et al (certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit). US v Rutherford, 442 US 544, 1979.
  • 10
    • 33746699651 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Access before approval: A right to take experimental drugs?
    • Okie S. Access before approval: a right to take experimental drugs? N Engl J Med 2006;355(5):437-440.
    • (2006) N Engl J Med , vol.355 , Issue.5 , pp. 437-440
    • Okie, S.1
  • 11
    • 33645828754 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Society for Clinical Trials opposes US legislation to permit marketing of unproven medical therapies for seriously ill patients
    • Society for Clinical Trials Board of Directors
    • Society for Clinical Trials Board of Directors. The Society for Clinical Trials opposes US legislation to permit marketing of unproven medical therapies for seriously ill patients. Clin Trials 2006;3(2):154-157.
    • (2006) Clin Trials , vol.3 , Issue.2 , pp. 154-157
  • 12
    • 33845416054 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Food and Drug Administration, partner in drug development
    • editorial
    • Yates JW. Food and Drug Administration, partner in drug development (editorial). CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56(6):321-322.
    • (2006) CA Cancer J Clin , vol.56 , Issue.6 , pp. 321-322
    • Yates, J.W.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.